DPKdebator
Smash Apprentice
Considering the fact that Melee may get ported to the Nintendo Switch's Virtual Console, would you like to see aspects of the game changed/added onto (i.e. new stages, character balance)?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This I can agree with.All buffs no nerfs... or no changes. Online regardless and player ranks/matchmaking.
really they need to look at SD remix and do that.I want G&W l cancel, and Roy buffs. This may not be the most popular of opinions, but I feel like balancing out some low tier characters really would improve the melee meta game.
The salt from Melee players would be hilarious, and then everyone would just ignore the new version and go back. Even if Fox got the slightest nerfs there would be so much rage and butthurt. Fox has been around for so long that even putting the words "Fox" and "nerf" in the same sentence is total heresy.I wonder how people would react if Fox was made worse than Donkey Kong.
They probably need to buff your main's kill setupsFor what? They don't need to change a single thing.
I wouldn't quite say that. As long as Nintendo correctly emulates the game so that there is very little to no additional input lag, we can hook the Switch up to an Asus or BenQ gaming monitor. Sure it won't be as lagless as a CRT, but it gets extremely close, to the point where it's hard to notice a difference.Remember, we still need to play on CRTs to get those frame perfect inputs, so unless through some kind of miracle Nintendo rectified this issue, a Switch version will be ignored no matter what.
BenQ monitors are pretty pricey, though. Those can't exactly be the most efficient for larger tournaments. What makes CRTs so used today is that you can pick one up at a thrift shop for like 20 bucks, and they've got shelves of them.I wouldn't quite say that. As long as Nintendo correctly emulates the game so that there is very little to no additional input lag, we can hook the Switch up to an Asus or BenQ gaming monitor. Sure it won't be as lagless as a CRT, but it gets extremely close, to the point where it's hard to notice a difference.
While I do agree with you on the fact that CRTs are significantly cheaper, they are much more of a hassle to ship since they are so huge and heavy. On top of that, CRTs don't last forever and are being thrown out frequently. Though this probably matters less, the input lag for the same flatscreen monitor is more consistent than 30 different CRTs. Finally, being able to use regular monitors would open up a door for a sponsorship from BenQ or Asus for tournaments. For national tournaments, this would work. For locals and regional, however, CRTs still reign supreme.BenQ monitors are pretty pricey, though. Those can't exactly be the most efficient for larger tournaments. What makes CRTs so used today is that you can pick one up at a thrift shop for like 20 bucks, and they've got shelves of them.