Conviction
Human Nature
I expected this to be a joke thread. I approve of the derp. Good work handling things Holder.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
best idea I've heard all dayOh dat crazy Biff.
Personally, I think a Groose hazard could be very suited to a "Grooseland"/Sacred Grounds stage, especially if he brings the Groosenator with him. A playable appearance would still be preferred, of course.
There was no mistake. I added a "because" to connect the two sentences just to further clarify. Imagine the "because" not there and you can see that you were the one clearly mistaken. The chances of someone else making that mistake was slim, like Groose's chances, but I decided to make it real easy just in case.Yeah, I noticed he edited his post after I pointed out his mistake. LOL :-P
Ghirahim has no chance of reappearing in the Zelda series. He was a plot device character, that's it. He has about the same chance of reappearing as Fi, Midna, or Navi, which is to say, none. Skyward Sword is a prequel. Ghirahim hasn't been in any other games. Neither has Fi. They're not bringing them back, no matter what Holder says.I have mentioned this is the Ghirahim thread. Might as well make the point here.
Groose will probably not be a mainstay in the Zelda series and does not really have much potential to show up again. He is another kooky Hyrulian character.
Ghirahim is the "EVIL Master Sword." He can be reworked into future games. Maybe in a future game, Link can have the choice of finding the Master Sword or the Ghirahim sword. The choice keeps him as Link or changes him to Dark Link. Or Ghirahim can be a bonus sword. Could do the most damage but not allow Link to collect hearts. Many possibilities.
What about Groose. What makes you think he will appear again?Ghirahim has no chance of reappearing in the Zelda series. He was a plot device character, that's it. He has about the same chance of reappearing as Fi, Midna, or Navi, which is to say, none. Skyward Sword is a prequel. Ghirahim hasn't been in any other games. Neither has Fi. They're not bringing them back, no matter what Holder says.
Well technically, as the spirit of the Master Sword, Fi has appeared in all the Zelda games (at least a majority that featured the legendary sword).Ghirahim has no chance of reappearing in the Zelda series. He was a plot device character, that's it. He has about the same chance of reappearing as Fi, Midna, or Navi, which is to say, none. Skyward Sword is a prequel. Ghirahim hasn't been in any other games. Neither has Fi. They're not bringing them back, no matter what Holder says.
Could doesn't mean will. The only time characters have appeared across series (except Tingle) were direct sequels.The only way I can see Ghirahim appearing again is in a prequel to Skyward Sword, which seems kind of ridiculous considering that Skyward Sword is the prequel to pretty much every other game in the franchise.
Groose could definitely have some sort of ancestor appearing in another game, or even assume a Tingle-like role by just appearing as himself out of nowhere in another game. It's a long shot, but it could happen.
Fi has appeared as the master sword in nearly every Zelda game. You really don't think that Ghirahim could appear as the long-lost "EVIL" mastersword in a future Zelda game?"The only way I can see Ghirahim appearing again is in a prequel to Skyward Sword, which seems kind of ridiculous considering that Skyward Sword is the prequel to pretty much every other game in the franchise.
Groose could definitely have some sort of ancestor appearing in another game, or even assume a Tingle-like role by just appearing as himself out of nowhere in another game. It's a long shot, but it could happen.
Agreed. Assist trophy complete with theme music and the Groosenator.Groose is a great character but he has assist trophy written all over him same as Tingle. And frankly I really dont get this fan made criteria that a franchise character has to reoccur in order to appear in Smash, especially when Sakurai has given us his character criteria. Honestly so long as the character is interesting, has moveset potential and Sakurai has heard of the character then I highly doubt it matters how many games they've appeared in.
No named moves? Right-centring? Who are you, FA?