• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

FIFA World Cup 2010

Dre89

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
6,163
Location
Australia
NNID
Dre4789
Frank Lampard is consistenly statiscally the best midfielder (or at least top 3) midfielder in the EPL. Stastics includes, goals, assists, passes tackles etc.

You cannot overestimate the contribution of a 20-goal a season midfielder, who runs his guts out, distributes the ball well, and creates many other goals. This guy can do it all. Pretty much the only type of goal I don't recall him scoring is a 3-defender solo effort, and perhaps a bicycle kick. There is pretty much no weakness in Lampard's game, apart from him choking when he puts on the England shirt.

N9NE, as for Mascherano, there are only so many excuses you can make for him. You've admitted he contributes next to nothing offensively, in terms of goals and ball distribution, meaning that in order to be the best DM, or at least a 'big 4' DM, he would have to be virtually flawless defensively, yet he isn't. His foul rate is higher than most others, many of them being stupid fouls. He makes incredibly basic errors that Michael Owen wouldn't make if he was playing DM, like when he was no where near Tevez when he scored against Liverpool (back when he was at United, it was Berbatov's debut for United, Liverpool won 2-1 at Anfield). The defence wasn't at fault for the goal either, they had correctly retreated to their 6 yard line, because Berbatov was at the line, and the backline needed to cover the ball across the face of goal, and the striker run at the inside post. What proceeded to happen was that Carragher (of course) doesn't shut down Berbatov, who cuts it back to the edge of the area for Tevez to hit in a lovely curler. If your DM isn't tracking that run, then what on Earth is he there for?

If you watch the highlights of the famous 4 all draw at Anifield against Arsenal, Alonso has a hand in all of Liverpool's goals, and Mascherano is at fault for two of Arsenal's, Carragher being at fault for the other two if I remember correctly, who is even worse than Mascherano.

For the record, the reason why you don't see Alonso running back and sliding in on players is because he reads the game better in the initail situation.

If a DM is not going to score, and is not going to distribute the ball well, he needs to be flawless defensively. He needs to win the ball with 95% of his tackles, track 95% of his opponent's runs, and his short passing game has to be 95% accurate (Roy Keane once got 97% passing accuracy in a season). Mascherano does not achieve those statistics. Now if a non-offensive DM does not achieve those statistics, how is he a defensive specialist? How is it that any random player you throw in that position won't do better? Anyone can commit fouls/tugh tackles, and wall space, that doesn't make a good DM.

When I was talking about Etuhu, I was talking about recent Etuhu, who has pretty much climbed to Fulham's most in-form player at the moment (despite being Australian with no English heritage I'm a Fulham fan, and I was a fan before Schwarzer came, so it didn't have anything to do with him). Etuhu is not a frequent fouler, and whilst his distribution is not amazing, he is beginning to incorporate attacking runs into his game (something we saw him do for Nigeria at the WC), even to the point where he gets beyond the strikers to fashion chances (eg. against MUTD and his equaliser against Blackpool).

Yaya Toure and Busquettes (don't know how spell it) grossly surpass Mascherano as DMs. They win the ball enough, commit far less fouls, and are better on the ball. In Yaya's case, he even makes attacking runs every now and then.

I don't think Palacios and De Jong are in the league of Busquettes, Yaya, Alonso, Essien and current-form Etuhu. De Jong and Palacios are just ankle-winners like Mascherano, but Palacios has an underrated passing game, and the two of them simply have higher energy and strength levels than Mascherano. Jerome would not have scored that goal against either of these two.

Also, on a side-note, most players noted for their energy aren't really that good. With the exception of Tevez, the only time you talk about a player's energy is when there isn't anything better about them to talk about. There are players like Lampard and Milner, who match the energy levels of Kuyt, but they just have better traits we focus on.

Take a look at these 'energy' players. Apart from that, what special traits do the likes of Kuyt, Park Ji Sung, Fletcher and Cattermole have? None. Their energy is highlighted because it's the only thing they have.

It's like John O'Shea. The guy has no special ability in anything, he's just a nothing player, but people just blindly assume he's one of the most versatile players in the world, merely because he's been played in a lot of positions. Versatility means you're good at them, not just that you've played them. Generally, players who get moved around are either squad players or players not good enough to hold a particular position in the first team. O'Shea is not one of the most versatile players in the world. If you could duplicate one player to maker a whole team of them (eg. a team of 11 Frank Lampards) John O'Shea wouldn't even come into the reckoning, so how on Earth is he one of the most versatile players in the world?
 

Olikus

Smash Champion
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
2,451
Location
Norway
Like I said. Lampard is good. But even ìf he scores many goals when he have the familiar chelsea players around him that makes him comfortable, I don't think he is the best midfielder in the world. He hasn't got that little extra to control a game like scholes, gerrard, iniesta and xavi. Chelseas main power lays in drogba and essien. But don't get me wrong, he is one of the best midfielder in EPL ofc. Even if I hate Chelsea Im not dumb. Besides that i agree on the rest that you say. Mascherano is sooooo overrated.
 

Dre89

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
6,163
Location
Australia
NNID
Dre4789
But the same could be said about the other players you mentioned, they're just in good teams.

Take Scholes for example, still a good player, but he only controls the game because he gets so much time on the ball, which is a result of the opposition fearing MUTD and sitting back.

Gerard is less consistent than Lampard, and does more reckless tackles. He also scores less goals. You see Lampard chipping keepers from outside the box with his left foot, or going between two defenders then slotting in a through ball for Anelka, you don't see Gerard do that stuff (except for the slotting through balls for Chelsea strikers part).

Xavi is a great player, but overrated. He's intelligent, but not a genius (look up Michael Laudrup Assists on Youtube). Most of his passes are readable. I'd prefer him as a DM alongside Busquettes, where he can control the game, because he's not a penetrative player with a killer instinct for goals. Pairing him with another DM would also relieve him of some of the defensive duty.
 

Olikus

Smash Champion
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
2,451
Location
Norway
Even if Scholes gets his time with help, he also makes time. By be one step before the opponent. Like a chessplayer. But its unfair to set Lampard up against Scholes. For Gerrard, last year lampard was better because he scored incredible 20 goals and gerrard had his worst season ever. So if its continue that way, Lampard has been better than Gerrard. But before last year, Gerrard has done more. Chelsea without Lamprad( even if that is rare) manage to do fine. Liverpool without Gerrard is on level with Fulham and Aston villa. You cant deny that liverpools champions league success the last year, or even top 4 in premier league is because of Gerrard. And for xavi and iniesta( even if iniesta often play on the side) they do more passing, and gameplayswitching and actually allso dribbling and first touch better than Lampard. If Lampard hadnt score that much goals I don't think he would had got the same status as those 4 players I mentioned. But ofc, again don't get me wrong, he is one hell of a good player.
 

Dre89

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
6,163
Location
Australia
NNID
Dre4789
But then that's like saying if Alan Shearer hadn't scored so many goals, he wouldn't be considered a legend. Those goals are what made him a legend.

Chelsea can do better without FL than Liverpool without SG because Chelsea are a far better side.

You have to remember FL is the highest scoring midfielder ever in the EPL, having scored more goals now than Scholes and Pires.

I think Iniesta is better than Xavi, because they have the same passing game, but Iniesta is more penetrative.
 

Olikus

Smash Champion
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
2,451
Location
Norway
I see all your points, but again scoring isn't everything. FL haven't scored that many more goals than scholes, and scholes has so much more to his games than scoring goals. So again I don't see things in Lampards game that makes him better than the best players in the world, except scoring allot of goals for his clubteam. But if you think FL is the best player in the world, ok then we disagree. Also mean that Iniesta is better than xavi though. More range in his game.
 

-Rei-

Saviour of PacWest
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
9,699
Location
Japan
champions league group stage start today

does anyone wanna do predictions with a similar format as the world cup?

i can't do it since i completely forgot and have something with friends tomorrow
 

Dre89

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
6,163
Location
Australia
NNID
Dre4789
Tipping a 74th minute header from Alan Hutton to clinch it for Spurs.

You heard it here first.
 
Top Bottom