As someone who actually understands a thing or two about ebola because I've been following it closesly, I can say with 100% confidence that the article you have linked is absolutely full of ****.
Especially the first two points. It is not almost impossible to catch at all.
One guy in Dallas caught it and already two nurses have caught it as a result. And they're medically trained professionals who have at least level 2 biological security suits on.
Do you think they were french kissing the patient or dousing their bare hands in blood?
If there ever is an outbreak, people who write and link absolute lies like that will be responsible for many deaths in the US of people who will think ebola is difficult to catch when it's not hard to catch at all.
And btw, an R0 of 2 means that for every person that gets it, that means at least 2 others will get it. As long as the R0 remains at 1 or above, then ebola will never be stopped. 2 is plenty high.
Basically ebola having an R0 of 2 means that the number of infected people will double every 3 weeks. It started with 1 patient and has doubled about 13 times so far. It only needs to double 20 more times to infect the entire world.
"Ebola is spreading exponentially, with the number of cases doubling every 3 weeks. It all started with a single infected 2 year old boy. To get from one case to 8000 there have been 13 doublings: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192. (Of course it doesn't spread exactly like this, some cases infect dozens of people, others infect none, but it kind of averages out.) To infect the entire world will take 33 doublings. So we've had 13 of the 33 doublings needed to infect the entire world, which is about 40 percent of the required doublings. So from Ebola's point of view, it's 40 percent along the way of it's chain of transmission to infect the world. Or to put it another way, at the current rate of spreading, everyone in the world will be infected in another 60 weeks."
source
Of course the R0 should theoretically be lower in the west because of our superior infrastructure and medical understanding, but so far it looks like we have an R0 approaching 2 even in a Texas hospital settings where the nurses are wearing biological security suits. If ebola was outside the hospital, and if people believed the lies you are spreading about how it's so hard to catch ebola, then that sort of misinformation would be catastrophically deadly and would ensure a high R0.