• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Ebola thread: Chill out if you want to discuss it.

How prepared are you for ebola?


  • Total voters
    44

XDaDePsak

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 16, 2001
Messages
10,074
Swine flu was a lot different. It was airborne and spread much more easily than how Ebola does. I remember I went to China during Swine Flu, and I'll never forget seeing about 75% of the people at the airport wearing masks and gloves. It totally shocked me.
Swine Flu infected something like 1/5 of the Earth's population in 2009. It didn't kill any more people than the typical flu strain does. The only thing that made it stand out and scare people is instead of just killing the elderly, infants and the sick which is what normal flu strains do, it was killing perfectly healthy young adults.

Ebola may not be as contagious as the flu, but it has an incredibly high mortality rate and will kill you regardless of your health or age. And it will kill you in an extremely horrific manner.
 

Chinaux

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 1, 2014
Messages
633
Swine Flu infected something like 1/5 of the Earth's population in 2009. It didn't kill any more people than the typical flu strain does. The only thing that made it stand out and scare people is instead of just killing the elderly, infants and the sick which is what normal flu strains do, it was killing perfectly healthy young adults.

Ebola may not be as contagious as the flu, but it has an incredibly high mortality rate and will kill you regardless of your health or age. And it will kill you in an extremely horrific manner.
Swine flu didn't kill healthy adults. It also just killed elderly and young children.

Ebola however, like you said, will kill you in a gruesome manner regardless, but will never spread globally unless some mutation/adaptation/human mistake happens. But still the odds of any of us getting it are like winning the lottery then walking out and getting hit by a car.
 
Last edited:

Muttley

Smash Cadet
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
53
Location
Hell, Texas
3DS FC
3695-0540-9836
Sorry, internet did something weird and double posted. Please delete
 
Last edited:

XDaDePsak

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 16, 2001
Messages
10,074
Swine flu didn't kill healthy adults. It also just killed elderly and young children.
"Swine flu investigators in Mexico are trying to understand why some young adults died rapidly from influenza infections that usually kill people who are very young or very old." - bloomberg

"The H1N1 pandemic virus that took the world by storm in 2009 may have had an unexpected accomplice. Some of the thousands who died may have been victims of their own immune systems, suggests a paper appearing in Nature Medicine today. The study provides a possible answer to one of the most baffling questions since the virus appeared in the spring of last year: Why did the virus cause most damage in 20- to 50-year-olds—who are generally the healthiest—while sparing the very young and the very old?" - sciencemag

"59% of all in-hospital deaths occurred in previously healthy people." - wikipedia / scientific literature
 

Chinaux

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 1, 2014
Messages
633
"Swine flu investigators in Mexico are trying to understand why some young adults died rapidly from influenza infections that usually kill people who are very young or very old." - bloomberg

"The H1N1 pandemic virus that took the world by storm in 2009 may have had an unexpected accomplice. Some of the thousands who died may have been victims of their own immune systems, suggests a paper appearing in Nature Medicine today. The study provides a possible answer to one of the most baffling questions since the virus appeared in the spring of last year: Why did the virus cause most damage in 20- to 50-year-olds—who are generally the healthiest—while sparing the very young and the very old?" - sciencemag

"59% of all in-hospital deaths occurred in previously healthy people." - wikipedia / scientific literature
Sorry, I was misinformed. I'm glad I didn't catch swine flu then :bee:
 

LarsINTJ

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
406
Location
Truth is binary, not a continuum.
It's much easier to avoid infection from an Ebola patient than a Flu patient. The virus is not airborne, it only spreads via bodily fluids. Disposable gloves and frequent hand-washing is quite adequate, just remember not to touch your face, basic hygiene. Most people who contract Ebola recklessly come into very close contact with infected fluids/surfaces
 
Last edited:

XDaDePsak

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 16, 2001
Messages
10,074
Officials Admit a ‘Defeat’ by Ebola in Sierra Leone
FREETOWN, Sierra Leone — Acknowledging a major “defeat” in the fight against Ebola, international health officials battling the epidemic in Sierra Leone approved plans on Friday to help families tend to patients at home, recognizing that they are overwhelmed and have little chance of getting enough treatment beds in place quickly to meet the surging need.
 

LarsINTJ

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
406
Location
Truth is binary, not a continuum.
Officials Admit a ‘Defeat’ by Ebola in Sierra Leone
FREETOWN, Sierra Leone — Acknowledging a major “defeat” in the fight against Ebola, international health officials battling the epidemic in Sierra Leone approved plans on Friday to help families tend to patients at home, recognizing that they are overwhelmed and have little chance of getting enough treatment beds in place quickly to meet the surging need.
...maybe because aid workers are being shunned/murdered and locals are continuing to do exactly what they're advised not to if they wish to avoid spreading the easily contained virus.
 

XDaDePsak

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 16, 2001
Messages
10,074
...maybe because aid workers are being shunned/murdered and locals are continuing to do exactly what they're advised not to if they wish to avoid spreading the easily contained virus.
Human error exists in many forms. Don't think Americans wouldn't be prone to their own form of mismanaging containment.

Imagine some dude who has an arrest warrant gets ebola? Or an illegal immigrant? Some people might take their chances before 'turning themselves in' so to speak. People can be stupid and selfish, and that's not something usually taken into account in our assessment of how well we can contain an outbreak.
 

FalKoopa

Rainbow Waifu
BRoomer
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
32,231
Location
India/भारत
3DS FC
1650-3685-3998
Switch FC
SW-5545-7990-4793
...maybe because aid workers are being shunned/murdered and locals are continuing to do exactly what they're advised not to if they wish to avoid spreading the easily contained virus.
Apparently, 10% of the ebola victims are the medical staff themselves. The hospitals are already reeling due to the lack of beds and this is just compounding the problem.
 

Tino

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 31, 2014
Messages
7,212
Location
Spartanburg, South Carolina
NNID
FaustinoRojo10
3DS FC
5284-1678-8857
Switch FC
SW-6232-2426-8037
The first I've heard about the news, I became concerned for my family members living there, specifically in Arlington, which is about 20 miles away from Dallas. And even though the CDC says that the chances of the virus spreading across the country are very low, they still can't afford to take any chances. It's bad enough that West Africa is going through hell with the virus; there's already more than 4,000 people dead from it as of now...
 

2004Zilla

Smash Master
Joined
Oct 3, 2014
Messages
3,573
Location
Somewhere
NNID
2004Zilla
Now we're all going to get Ebola. I am currently hiding in my bunker in my backyard with a sniper rifle and am ready to no-scope the Ebola-infected zombies that try to break in.
 

Tino

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 31, 2014
Messages
7,212
Location
Spartanburg, South Carolina
NNID
FaustinoRojo10
3DS FC
5284-1678-8857
Switch FC
SW-6232-2426-8037
Unless there's a confirmed case anywhere in South Carolina, I'm not concerned at all...however I still pray for my other family members in the Dallas-Fort Worth area hoping their days won't be numbered.
 

Jason the Yoshi

Watching Me, Wanting Me
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
18,791
Location
Waiting for Jesus
I wouldn't worry. One of my high school buddies I called on FaceTime last night plays basketball in Texas and he said that they're starting to get it under control.
 

XDaDePsak

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 16, 2001
Messages
10,074
I wouldn't worry. One of my high school buddies I called on FaceTime last night plays basketball in Texas and he said that they're starting to get it under control.
What do you mean by under control exactly?

Breaking news:

2nd person tests positive for Ebola

DALLAS, TX (WFLA) -
A second health care worker at a Dallas hospital who provided care for the first Ebola patient diagnosed in the U.S. has tested positive for the disease, the Texas Department of State Health Services said Wednesday.
 

XDaDePsak

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 16, 2001
Messages
10,074
Here's an article that may or may not put everyone at some kind of ease.
As someone who actually understands a thing or two about ebola because I've been following it closesly, I can say with 100% confidence that the article you have linked is absolutely full of ****.

Especially the first two points. It is not almost impossible to catch at all.

One guy in Dallas caught it and already two nurses have caught it as a result. And they're medically trained professionals who have at least level 2 biological security suits on.

Do you think they were french kissing the patient or dousing their bare hands in blood?

If there ever is an outbreak, people who write and link absolute lies like that will be responsible for many deaths in the US of people who will think ebola is difficult to catch when it's not hard to catch at all.

And btw, an R0 of 2 means that for every person that gets it, that means at least 2 others will get it. As long as the R0 remains at 1 or above, then ebola will never be stopped. 2 is plenty high.

Basically ebola having an R0 of 2 means that the number of infected people will double every 3 weeks. It started with 1 patient and has doubled about 13 times so far. It only needs to double 20 more times to infect the entire world.

"Ebola is spreading exponentially, with the number of cases doubling every 3 weeks. It all started with a single infected 2 year old boy. To get from one case to 8000 there have been 13 doublings: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192. (Of course it doesn't spread exactly like this, some cases infect dozens of people, others infect none, but it kind of averages out.) To infect the entire world will take 33 doublings. So we've had 13 of the 33 doublings needed to infect the entire world, which is about 40 percent of the required doublings. So from Ebola's point of view, it's 40 percent along the way of it's chain of transmission to infect the world. Or to put it another way, at the current rate of spreading, everyone in the world will be infected in another 60 weeks." source
Of course the R0 should theoretically be lower in the west because of our superior infrastructure and medical understanding, but so far it looks like we have an R0 approaching 2 even in a Texas hospital settings where the nurses are wearing biological security suits. If ebola was outside the hospital, and if people believed the lies you are spreading about how it's so hard to catch ebola, then that sort of misinformation would be catastrophically deadly and would ensure a high R0.
 
Last edited:

Jason the Yoshi

Watching Me, Wanting Me
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
18,791
Location
Waiting for Jesus
What do you mean by under control exactly?

Breaking news:

2nd person tests positive for Ebola

DALLAS, TX (WFLA) -
A second health care worker at a Dallas hospital who provided care for the first Ebola patient diagnosed in the U.S. has tested positive for the disease, the Texas Department of State Health Services said Wednesday.
It's a long story, and it's gonna involve science, but here it goes

So the liquid part of blood is called Plasma. Plasma contains a lot of things, especially antigens and antibodies. A guy down in Texas who survived to be rid of Ebola just donated some of his plasma to the hospital since his plasma contains antigens and antibodies that recognize and destroy Ebola viruses so they never become a problem again. This basically confirms that the plasma can be sent into the infected patients body to make them feel better faster since they now have antigens that recognize and kill the Ebola virus on the spot. This clearly states that we're getting somewhere, and the tides are turning.
 

XDaDePsak

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 16, 2001
Messages
10,074
It's a long story, and it's gonna involve science, but here it goes

So the liquid part of blood is called Plasma. Plasma contains a lot of things, especially antigens and antibodies. A guy down in Texas who survived to be rid of Ebola just donated some of his plasma to the hospital since his plasma contains antigens and antibodies that recognize and destroy Ebola viruses so they never become a problem again. This basically confirms that the plasma can be sent into the infected patients body to make them feel better faster since they now have antigens that recognize and kill the Ebola virus on the spot. This clearly states that we're getting somewhere, and the tides are turning.
There's a fairly huge difference between "having a viable treatment for ebola" and "having ebola under control".
 

Jason the Yoshi

Watching Me, Wanting Me
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
18,791
Location
Waiting for Jesus
There's a fairly huge difference between "having a viable treatment for ebola" and "having ebola under control".
If they keep using the technique of donating anti Ebola antigens, then the problem may as well be solved before things get too late.
As someone who actually understands a thing or two about ebola because I've been following it closesly, I can say with 100% confidence that the article you have linked is absolutely full of ****.

Especially the first two points. It is not almost impossible to catch at all.

One guy in Dallas caught it and already two nurses have caught it as a result. And they're medically trained professionals who have at least level 2 biological security suits on.

Do you think they were french kissing the patient or dousing their bare hands in blood?

If there ever is an outbreak, people who write and link absolute lies like that will be responsible for many deaths in the US of people who will think ebola is difficult to catch when it's not hard to catch at all.

And btw, an R0 of 2 means that for every person that gets it, that means at least 2 others will get it. As long as the R0 remains at 1 or above, then ebola will never be stopped. 2 is plenty high.

Basically ebola having an R0 of 2 means that the number of infected people will double every 3 weeks. It started with 1 patient and has doubled about 13 times so far. It only needs to double 20 more times to infect the entire world.

"Ebola is spreading exponentially, with the number of cases doubling every 3 weeks. It all started with a single infected 2 year old boy. To get from one case to 8000 there have been 13 doublings: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192. (Of course it doesn't spread exactly like this, some cases infect dozens of people, others infect none, but it kind of averages out.) To infect the entire world will take 33 doublings. So we've had 13 of the 33 doublings needed to infect the entire world, which is about 40 percent of the required doublings. So from Ebola's point of view, it's 40 percent along the way of it's chain of transmission to infect the world. Or to put it another way, at the current rate of spreading, everyone in the world will be infected in another 60 weeks." source
Of course the R0 should theoretically be lower in the west because of our superior infrastructure and medical understanding, but so far it looks like we have an R0 approaching 2 even in a Texas hospital settings where the nurses are wearing biological security suits. If ebola was outside the hospital, and if people believed the lies you are spreading about how it's so hard to catch ebola, then that sort of misinformation would be catastrophically deadly and would ensure a high R0.
Actually, as a second year college student of Anatomy and Physiology, I can tell you that the article is not biased in any way, and you are simply suffering from a severe case of Paranoia from this. African doctors only have the experience of elementary school nurses, compared to them, American doctors are Einstein, and Ebola hasn't even wiped out West Africa yet. It may be 60 days before the deadline, but for American doctors, that's plenty of time to solve the problem
 
Last edited:

TimeSmash

Smash Champion
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
2,669
Location
Inside a cheesecake
NNID
nintend64
Spanish nursing staff resigns to avoid treating Ebola cases
Carlos III Hospital in Madrid, the health center where Ebola victim Teresa Romero is being treated, is having to draft in extra staff given that nurses are refusing to work with cases – or suspected cases – of the virus, claiming that safety conditions are not adequate.
A little ****ed up since they took the Hippocratic Oath, but equally ****ed up that the proper PPE isn't being provided. Lose-lose situation much??
 

XDaDePsak

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 16, 2001
Messages
10,074
Actually, as a second year college student of Anatomy and Physiology, I can tell you that the article is not biased in any way, and you are simply suffering from a severe case of Paranoia from this. African doctors only have the experience of elementary school nurses, compared to them, American doctors are Einstein, and Ebola hasn't even wiped out West Africa yet. It may be 60 days before the deadline, but for American doctors, that's plenty of time to solve the problem
Two American nurses likely caught ebola from a single guy. If this is what "Einstein" looks like in a controlled 1st world hospital setting, then we're not going to do very well.

Also, don't brag about being a second year college student. You're not the only person here who has taken college biology and anatomy. The amount of learnin' you've likely gotten in the one year you've completed is nothing to write home about, and definitely nothing to even attempt to hold over anyone else. Seriously -- you don't realize how goofy it sounds to be bragging about one year of college. The classes you took last year don't even qualify you to be a receptionist at a clinic. Don't oversell yourself.

I mean if we're going to brag about our schooling: As the former editor in chief of of one of the largest college newspapers in the country, I can tell you that article is indeed very biased.
 
Last edited:

Jason the Yoshi

Watching Me, Wanting Me
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
18,791
Location
Waiting for Jesus
Two American nurses caught ebola from a single guy. If this is what "Einstein" look like then we're not going to do very well.

Also, don't brag about being a second year college student. You're not the only person here who has taken college biology and anatomy. The amount of learnin' you've likely gotten in the one year you've completed is nothing to write home about, and definitely nothing to even attempt to hold over anyone else. Seriously -- you don't realize how goofy it sounds to be bragging about one year of college.

I mean if we're going to brag about our schooling: As the former editor in chief of of one of the largest college newspapers in the country, I can tell you that article is indeed very biased.
People do make mistakes, and even some of the sources YOU provided say the exact same thing as the article. And "Former editor in chief of college newspapers" is COMPLETELY off topic compared to someone who takes Anatomy in college, especially since you're wrong, this is my THIRD YEAR OF EXPERIENCE in the fields of anatomy, and that I've known about Ebola for SIX years. The fact that Ebola is only transmitted through body fluids goes against what you said about the two nurses, so the nurses simply made a mistake while working on the patient that they're not telling us. Something can be done now that they're using survivors blood plasma to deliver anti Ebola antigens to patients. Quit spreading your paranoid pessimistic bull ****!
 

XDaDePsak

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 16, 2001
Messages
10,074
The fact that Ebola is only transmitted through body fluids goes against what you said about the two nurses,
Quote me exactly. Tell me exactly what I said that was incorrect.

And "Former editor in chief of college newspapers" is COMPLETELY off topic
Having a firm grasp of the English language (Which you clearly don't -- I will demonstrate this if you follow my previous request and quote me where I'm allegedly wrong about the nurses) is a vital aspect of the discussion we are having.

Especially important and relevant is knowing the difference between hard news (objective; facts) and an editorial viewpoint (subjective; opinion; related to bias). This article was written in an editorial style.
 
Last edited:

#HBC | Acrostic

♖♘♗♔♕♗♘♖
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
2,453
I'm really worried about getting KPC at the NIH while I get treated for my ebola.
 
Last edited:

Jason the Yoshi

Watching Me, Wanting Me
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
18,791
Location
Waiting for Jesus
Quote me exactly. Tell me exactly what I said that was incorrect.



Having a firm grasp of the English language (Which you clearly don't -- I will demonstrate this if you follow my previous request and quote me where I'm allegedly wrong about the nurses) is a vital aspect of the discussion we are having.

Especially important and relevant is knowing the difference between hard news (objective; facts) and an editorial viewpoint (subjective; opinion; related to bias). This article was written in an editorial style.
You said it yourself in one of the sources you provided which said that its only contracted through bodily fluids.

And I know how to differentiate between news and editorials, having recent experience in such matter, but the article pretty much covers everything my anatomy professor has said about Ebola.
 

#HBC | Acrostic

♖♘♗♔♕♗♘♖
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
2,453
As someone who actually understands a thing or two about ebola because I've been following it closesly, I can say with 100% confidence that the article you have linked is absolutely full of ****.

Especially the first two points. It is not almost impossible to catch at all.

One guy in Dallas caught it and already two nurses have caught it as a result. And they're medically trained professionals who have at least level 2 biological security suits on.

Do you think they were french kissing the patient or dousing their bare hands in blood?

If there ever is an outbreak, people who write and link absolute lies like that will be responsible for many deaths in the US of people who will think ebola is difficult to catch when it's not hard to catch at all.

And btw, an R0 of 2 means that for every person that gets it, that means at least 2 others will get it. As long as the R0 remains at 1 or above, then ebola will never be stopped. 2 is plenty high.

Basically ebola having an R0 of 2 means that the number of infected people will double every 3 weeks. It started with 1 patient and has doubled about 13 times so far. It only needs to double 20 more times to infect the entire world.

"Ebola is spreading exponentially, with the number of cases doubling every 3 weeks. It all started with a single infected 2 year old boy. To get from one case to 8000 there have been 13 doublings: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192. (Of course it doesn't spread exactly like this, some cases infect dozens of people, others infect none, but it kind of averages out.) To infect the entire world will take 33 doublings. So we've had 13 of the 33 doublings needed to infect the entire world, which is about 40 percent of the required doublings. So from Ebola's point of view, it's 40 percent along the way of it's chain of transmission to infect the world. Or to put it another way, at the current rate of spreading, everyone in the world will be infected in another 60 weeks." source
Of course the R0 should theoretically be lower in the west because of our superior infrastructure and medical understanding, but so far it looks like we have an R0 approaching 2 even in a Texas hospital settings where the nurses are wearing biological security suits. If ebola was outside the hospital, and if people believed the lies you are spreading about how it's so hard to catch ebola, then that sort of misinformation would be catastrophically deadly and would ensure a high R0.
She wasn't wearing a biological security suit.
 

XDaDePsak

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 16, 2001
Messages
10,074
You said it yourself in one of the sources you provided which said that its only contracted through bodily fluids.

And I know how to differentiate between news and editorials, having recent experience in such matter, but the article pretty much covers everything my anatomy professor has said about Ebola.
Quote me or admit you're wrong.
 
Top Bottom