• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official DLC Character Discussion Thread - Read the new sticky/announcement

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Light Music Club

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 25, 2013
Messages
3,225
Location
Knoxville, MD/Elizabethtown, PA
NNID
_TLMC_
3DS FC
0576-6097-0725
I present to you a choice.



or


Someone forgot about Nekopara the game actually has a chest bounce slider:


Neither are correct.

While it's true that she was a character that very few if at all expected to show up, she WAS NOT added for that reason.


Oh yeah, I'm wrong. I remember someone saying that a while back and for some reason thought Sakurai was the one to actually say that. Thanks for the correction.
 

Burruni

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
9,408
Location
Some Netherworld
Someone forgot about Nekopara the game actually has a chest bounce slider:




Oh yeah, I'm wrong. I remember someone saying that a while back and for some reason thought Sakurai was the one to actually say that. Thanks for the correction.
UNLESS NEKOPARA WAS ON A NINTENDO CONSOLE MY POINT STANDS.


I hear the Senran Kagura games are very solid games, Jim Sterling's fans almost entirely disliked his review because it only focused on the fanservice iirc
They're.... shallower Bayonetta. The gameplay, characters, and story actually draws you in a lot more than the clear fanservice that it wears on its sleeve. But it certainly doesn't have the raw quality of music or writing that Bayonetta totes.

Jesus it took so much willpower not to make a mammary pun.
 
Last edited:

NintenZ

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Messages
12,445
Location
Nowhere important
3DS FC
5343-8848-6075
Switch FC
SW-0570-4210-6061
Am I the only one that thinks Kasumi could be an interesting addition for Smash? :glare:
 
Last edited:

Cutie Gwen

Lovely warrior
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
63,871
Location
Somewhere out there on this big blue marble
UNLESS NEKOPARA WAS ON A NINTENDO CONSOLE MY POINT STANDS.




They're.... shallower Bayonetta. The gameplay, characters, and story actually draws you in a lot more than the clear fanservice that it wears on its sleeve.
Xenoblade X lets you adjust bust size, just saiyan

It's so shameless too...Really rare, especially with Quiet's justification in MGSV
 

Burruni

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
9,408
Location
Some Netherworld
Am I the only one that thinks Kasumi could be an interesting addition for Smash? :glare:
Ryu Hayabusa being a main character of that series AND the main actual Ninja Gaiden titles argues against Kasumi being the person who bust-- BOASTS THE CREDITS! URRRGH I TRIED TO NOT DO IT
 

Munomario777

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 18, 2014
Messages
3,253
Location
Charleston, South Carolina
3DS FC
0387-9596-4480
Switch FC
SW-8229-3157-8114
8 player Smash can't even handle Metal Face, so nope, not to mention making a character exclusive to the less popular version will certainly be career suicide
It can handle up to eight characters, though, which is essentially what the ICs are in a four-player match. Heck, Sakurai's blatantly said that they were working on the Wii U version:
Sakurai said:
Among [the fighters who did not make it into the game] are the Ice Climbers, who were playable during development on the Wii U. However, moving the two as a pair required significant processing power. The 3DS was already being pushed to its limit, and I couldn’t get them to work no matter how hard I tried, so I gave up on them.
There will never be a version exclusive character in Super Smash Bros. If there was ever going to be one if would have happened already.
I don't see the logic in this. This is the first Smash Bros. game to have two versions, and it's not even finished yet (DLC). It's way too early to tell.

As far as Sakurai saying that the two versions would have the same roster, he does change his mind from time to time. He said the Villager had no moveset potential back in the Brawl days, but here we are.
 

Cutie Gwen

Lovely warrior
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
63,871
Location
Somewhere out there on this big blue marble
Ryu Hayabusa being a main character of that series AND the main actual Ninja Gaiden titles argues against Kasumi being the person who bust-- BOASTS THE CREDITS! URRRGH I TRIED TO NOT DO IT
Burruni dear, it's just a breast pun, calm your ****. WAIT...

Ryu Hayabusa is an interesting choice, for some reason I keep thinking of Stider Hiryu when thinking of how he'd play in Smash
 

Wintropy

Peace and love and all that jazzmatazz~! <3
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
10,032
Location
Here, there, who knows?
NNID
Winterwhite
3DS FC
1461-6253-6301
As far as Sakurai saying that the two versions would have the same roster, he does change his mind from time to time. He said the Villager had no moveset potential back in the Brawl days, but here we are.
He didn't say that. He said he didn't think Villager fit the tone of the game, due to the character's "peaceful" nature.

There's a difference between changing your mind on a character's thematic depiction and changing your mind on what is potentially a very risky business decision.
 

BluePikmin11

Akko is my dear daughter!
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
28,373
Location
https://twitter.com/BPikmin11
NNID
blue
Do you guys think Koei Tecmo's relationship with Nintendo with the Hyrule Warriors releases give Ryu Hayabasa a better chance? Just wondering, haven't seen anyone brought it up.
 

NintenZ

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Messages
12,445
Location
Nowhere important
3DS FC
5343-8848-6075
Switch FC
SW-0570-4210-6061
Burruni dear, it's just a breast pun, calm your ****. WAIT...

Ryu Hayabusa is an interesting choice, for some reason I keep thinking of Stider Hiryu when thinking of how he'd play in Smash
Huh, they're pretty similar if you think about it.
 

Cutie Gwen

Lovely warrior
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
63,871
Location
Somewhere out there on this big blue marble
It can handle up to eight characters, though, which is essentially what the ICs are in a four-player match. Heck, Sakurai's blatantly said that they were working on the Wii U version:


I don't see the logic in this. This is the first Smash Bros. game to have two versions, and it's not even finished yet (DLC). It's way too early to tell.

As far as Sakurai saying that the two versions would have the same roster, he does change his mind from time to time. He said the Villager had no moveset potential back in the Brawl days, but here we are.
Except 8 player smash wasn't officially confirmed then. 8 player smash also lags and removes certain hazards to reduce the lag.
Sakurai changing his mind on 1 character =/= changing business decision, the 3DS version is the best selling Smash game yet, outselling the Wii U version with ease, why screw over the majority?
 

Burruni

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
9,408
Location
Some Netherworld
It can handle up to eight characters, though, which is essentially what the ICs are in a four-player match. Heck, Sakurai's blatantly said that they were working on the Wii U version:


I don't see the logic in this. This is the first Smash Bros. game to have two versions, and it's not even finished yet (DLC). It's way too early to tell.

As far as Sakurai saying that the two versions would have the same roster, he does change his mind from time to time. He said the Villager had no moveset potential back in the Brawl days, but here we are.
WRONG
WRONG
WRONG IN SO MANY PLACES.

Let me scroll back to what I said earlier today.
Him going back on his word is INCREDIBLY rare, however.

:4villager:: "A fighter from the likes of Animal Crossing or Nintendogs wouldn't really fit in Smash because they're so Non-Violent."
Second: Ice Climbers would have to work without issue 60 fps a) on 3DS with 4 players all using them and b) on WiiU 8-Player Smash, meaning 16 Ice Climbers active.

Sakurai won't change his stance to force two characters to function on HALF of the game's versions. NINTENDO won't fund that for DLC.
 

NintenZ

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Messages
12,445
Location
Nowhere important
3DS FC
5343-8848-6075
Switch FC
SW-0570-4210-6061
Ivysaur. . .auto corrected to Snake.

yeah ok man you can just admit you were wrong instead of looking silly.
No really, on the Snake thread I typed in something similar to what I said earlier, since my phone didn't know what Ivysaur was, it corrected it to the word most closely associated to the previous word.
 

Kenith

Overkill Sarcasm
Joined
Dec 24, 2013
Messages
24,014
Location
The Fabulous Friendly Super Sparkle Train
NNID
RipoffmanXKTG
3DS FC
4210-4224-9442
I don't see the logic in this. This is the first Smash Bros. game to have two versions, and it's not even finished yet (DLC). It's way too early to tell.

As far as Sakurai saying that the two versions would have the same roster, he does change his mind from time to time. He said the Villager had no moveset potential back in the Brawl days, but here we are.
He never said that. He said that the Villagers' peaceful nature didn't fit the tone of Brawl.
Smash 4 is more cartoony and lighthearted than Brawl and lo and behold, we have Villager now.
Also, you don't see the logic in not creating a roster unbalance by adding a single character to half of the game's versions? Really?
 

Kabutops

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
253
He liked Lucas and Wolf.
Yeah, and?

Not a good excuse.
I'm not making excuses. I'm just trying to illustrate why I don't think Ice Climbers should be totally ruled out yet. I realize it is quite possible that they will not get in Smash 4. Also I don't even care about Ice Climbers so I have no reason to make excuses in the first place.

not to mention again, the 3DS simply can't handle 8 60fps characters with 4 of them using that A.I method, it's literally impossible.
I'd reply to this statement, but i don't like repeating myself.
 
Last edited:

Cutie Gwen

Lovely warrior
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
63,871
Location
Somewhere out there on this big blue marble
Yeah, and?


I'm not making excuses. I'm just trying to illustrate why I don't think Ice Climbers should be totally ruled out yet. I realize it is quite possible that they will not get in Smash 4. Also I don't even care about Ice Climbers so I have no reason to make excuses in the first place.


I'd reply to this statement, but i don't like repeating myself.
You said Sakurai might try to put time and money on something that may not work because he likes them. Lucas was DLC and Wolf isn't confirmed

I call BS, if you didn't care about them, you wouldn't be arguing against the fact the 3DS can't handle them

Yet you already did repeat yourself a few times so far
 

Lord-Zero

Smash Lord
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
1,740
Do you guys think Koei Tecmo's relationship with Nintendo with the Hyrule Warriors releases give Ryu Hayabasa a better chance? Just wondering, haven't seen anyone brought it up.

A little bit but I think a Hyrule Warriors character is more likely. It would not only be a Koei Tecmo rep but it'd also double as a Zelda rep and a nice nod to Hyrule Warriors' unexpected success. My vote's on Lana or Volga.
 
Last edited:

Wintropy

Peace and love and all that jazzmatazz~! <3
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
10,032
Location
Here, there, who knows?
NNID
Winterwhite
3DS FC
1461-6253-6301
I think people, both defenders and critics of Ice Climbers, need to understand something very important about the situation:

Sakurai didn't scrap the Icies due to malice or spite.

He had to scrap them because they presented a technical impossibility.

Sakurai said he tried everything possible to get them to work, but it wasn't feasible. He even tried to change the character's frame rate and switched off gravity.

That we know of, nothing short of changing the very nature of the character will get them to work in either version. The 3DS can't handle eight characters on-screen at a time, the Wii U can't handle 16. In order to be technically possible, the Icies would have to either:

- Be a single entity ("SoPo")
- Have the AI on the partner entity compromised massively
- Have the frame rate on the partner entity compromised massively
- Have both entities share animations without a distinctive AI

Sakurai evidently isn't happy with compromising the integrity of a veteran character, because then it will serve to undermine the very thing that the Icies were chosen for in the first place. He isn't going to have the character be playable in one version and not the other, because not only would it be unfair to fans of Smash 3DS, it'd be financial suicide, since Smash 3DS is massively popular in Japan compared to Smash Wii U. It's impossible either way, since Smash Wii U still can't handle the character. Whether you disagree with that or not is irrelevant, because it just isn't going to happen.

We have to accept that. For better or for worse, that's that.
 
Last edited:

Morbi

Scavenger
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,168
Location
Speculation God, GOML
I think people, both defenders and critics of Ice Climbers, need to understand something very important about the situation:

Sakurai didn't scrap the Icies due to malice or spite.

He had to scrap them because they presented a technical impossibility.

Sakurai said he tried everything possible to get them to work, but it wasn't feasible. He even tried to change the character's frame rate and switched off gravity.

That we know of, nothing short of changing the very nature of the character will get them to work in either version. The 3DS can't handle eight characters on-screen at a time, the Wii U can't handle 16. In order to be technically possible, the Icies would have to either:

- Be a single entity ("SoPo")
- Have the AI on the partner entity compromised massively
- Have the frame rate on the partner entity compromised massively
- Have both entities share animations without a distinctive AI

Sakurai evidently isn't happy with compromising the integrity of a veteran character, because then it will serve to undermine the very thing that the Icies were chosen for in the first place. He isn't going to have the character be playable in one version and not the other, because not only would it be unfair to fans of Smash 3DS, it'd be financial suicide, since Smash 3DS is massively popular in Japan compared to Smash Wii U. It's impossible either way, since Smash Wii U still can't handle the character. Whether you disagree with that or not is irrelevant, because it just isn't going to happen.

We have to accept that. For better or for worse, that's that.
Not necessarily. We do not know if he is "evidently" unhappy with compromising the integrity of a veteran character currently. As far as I am aware, Ice Climbers were never de-confirmed as DLC. The development team could always ban Ice Climbers from 8 player Smash in the same vein as Mii Fighter's online pseudo-ban too. Not that it is likely, per se. However, I do not believe that claiming "it just isn't going to happen" is being objective in the slightest.
 
Last edited:

Wintropy

Peace and love and all that jazzmatazz~! <3
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
10,032
Location
Here, there, who knows?
NNID
Winterwhite
3DS FC
1461-6253-6301
Not necessarily. We do not know if he is "evidently" unhappy with compromising the integrity of a veteran character currently. As far as I am aware, Ice Climbers were never de-confirmed as DLC. The development team could always ban Ice Climbers from 8 player Smash in the same vein as Mii Fighter's online pseudo-ban too. Not that it is likely, per se. However, I do not believe that claiming "it just isn't going to happen" is being objective in the slightest.
I think that's making up criteria to justify a context that, from consideration of due precedent, we have no reason to believe is going to happen.

You're right, it isn't objective. I didn't say it was. I'm saying that, from what we know (and I did say that in my thesis), there's no good reason to think that Sakurai is going to change his mind on this. It's possible that he will, but I don't think that goes with the evidence we've seen.

I stand by what I said. You're misinterpreting my statement when I said "it just isn't going to happen": I mean this magical reality where the Ice Climbers' problems suddenly don't exist isn't physically possible with what we currently know.

Incidentally, banning them in 8-Player Smash still doesn't rectify the 3DS thing. That's the real death knell for the Ice Climbers, in my opinion.
 

Morbi

Scavenger
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,168
Location
Speculation God, GOML
I think that's making up criteria to justify a context that, from consideration of due precedent, we have no reason to believe is going to happen.

You're right, it isn't objective. I didn't say it was. I'm saying that, from what we know (and I did say that in my thesis), there's no good reason to think that Sakurai is going to change his mind on this. It's possible that he will, but I don't think that goes with the evidence we've seen.

I stand by what I said. You're misinterpreting my statement when I said "it just isn't going to happen": I mean this magical reality where the Ice Climbers' problems suddenly don't exist isn't physically possible with what we currently know.

Incidentally, banning them in 8-Player Smash still doesn't rectify the 3DS thing. That's the real death knell for the Ice Climbers, in my opinion.
I agree, but the entire "your opinion is irrelevant because my opinion is better for some arbitrary reason" stance was somewhat off-putting to say the least. From what we know, there is a good reason to believe that Sakurai is going to change his mind on this. It is called the Smash ballot. IF they receive a serviceable amount of votes, I have no doubt that he would perhaps reconsider.
Whether he decides on a nerfed Ice Climbers, or SoPo, or nothing, is irrelevant. "Ice Climbers" are still possible.

So, back to the original point. I disagree with you and I have thoroughly demonstrated why that is the case. If you still believe that they have no chance whatsoever, so be it.
 

Wintropy

Peace and love and all that jazzmatazz~! <3
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
10,032
Location
Here, there, who knows?
NNID
Winterwhite
3DS FC
1461-6253-6301
I agree, but the entire "your opinion is irrelevant because my opinion is better for some arbitrary reason" stance was somewhat off-putting to say the least.
That inference is totally on you, dear.

From what we know, there is a good reason to believe that Sakurai is going to change his mind on this. It is called the Smash ballot. IF they receive a serviceable amount of votes, I have no doubt that he would perhaps reconsider.
I don't think it's a matter of reconsidering. If Sakurai is the man we reckon he is, he's still tinkering behind the scenes to make them work. He knows how popular they are. He doesn't need fan votes to remind him of that.

Whether he decides on a nerfed Ice Climbers, or SoPo, or nothing, is irrelevant. "Ice Climbers" are still possible.
That's exactly what I said.

So, back to the original point. I disagree with you and I have thoroughly demonstrated why that is the case. If you still believe that they have no chance whatsoever, so be it.
Okay.
 

Morbi

Scavenger
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
17,168
Location
Speculation God, GOML
That inference is totally on you, dear.



I don't think it's a matter of reconsidering. If Sakurai is the man we reckon he is, he's still tinkering behind the scenes to make them work. He knows how popular they are. He doesn't need fan votes to remind him of that.



That's exactly what I said.



Okay.
It's impossible either way, since Smash Wii U still can't handle the character. Whether you disagree with that or not is irrelevant, because it just isn't going to happen.

We have to accept that. For better or for worse, that's that.
I apologize, based on the way you phrased the above sentence(s), that was the impression I perceived. Regardless, I stated that I agreed with you, that is precisely why I restated what you said. It was intentional.

I think, when it comes down to it, there is a lot of precedent that indicates Ice Climbers are not feasible. But on the other hand, there is still reason to believe that they might be included after all. Stranger things have happened.
 
Last edited:

Wintropy

Peace and love and all that jazzmatazz~! <3
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
10,032
Location
Here, there, who knows?
NNID
Winterwhite
3DS FC
1461-6253-6301
I apologize, based on the way you phrased the above sentence(s), that was the impression I perceived. Regardless, I stated that I agreed with you, that is precisely why I restated what you said. It was intentional.

I think, when it comes down to it, there is a lot of precedent that indicates Ice Climbers are not feasible. But on the other hand, there is still reason to believe that they might be included after all. Stranger things have happened.
I agree, it's possible.

But I won't hold my breath.
 

Wintropy

Peace and love and all that jazzmatazz~! <3
Joined
Aug 28, 2014
Messages
10,032
Location
Here, there, who knows?
NNID
Winterwhite
3DS FC
1461-6253-6301
Just to clarify, I'd be over the moon if the Icies returned.

I don't care for them personally, but it's a shame to see any beloved veteran cut due to unfortunate circumstances.
 

Kabutops

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
253
You said Sakurai might try to put time and money on something that may not work because he likes them. Lucas was DLC and Wolf isn't confirmed
Sorry, I just don't see what point you're trying to make here.

I call BS, if you didn't care about them, you wouldn't be arguing against the fact the 3DS can't handle them
I make claims about characters I'm dispassionate about. If someone makes a counter statement that I don't agree with I feel obligated to defend my claim. If you can't fathom such a thing as that then that's your business.

Yet you already did repeat yourself a few times so far
Yes and I'm sick of having to do so. Me saying that I don't like repeating myself is kind of my cue that I don't like engaging in circular debates which is what this discussion is quickly degenerating into.

I say we rap this fruitless discussion up with the following: You & others here think Ice Climbers is impossible to get in due to technical limitations of the 3ds and I disagree.

/discussion

bye
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member

Guest
Only way I can see the Climbers included is if they were completely re-invented with a different two-in-one gimmick that the 3DS CAN handle, such as the way Billy and Mandy work in PTE.

That being said, I don't see Sakurai willing to do that, otherwise it would already have been done and we wouldn't be discussing this.
 

JaidynReiman

Smash Hero
Joined
May 31, 2014
Messages
8,840
NNID
JaidynReiman
A little bit but I think a Hyrule Warriors character is more likely. It would not only be a Koei Tecmo rep but it'd also double as a Zelda rep and a nice nod to Hyrule Warriors' unexpected success. My vote's on Lana or Volga.
A Hyrule Warriors rep that has appeared in main Zelda games? Sure, I could easily see that happen. An HW exclusive rep? Hell no, it won't happen. If they draw from HW, they'd do it for Impa and give her an HW-based moveset rather than use an HW-exclusive character.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom