People banning because probably some irrelevant and imperceptible framedrop, banning because "Oh no sharking is bad but i can't prove it" and "oh no, go through the stage is BAD because you are avoiding ledge game all the time" without prove it, without being something overcentralizing to the game and degenerate. Banning 2 weeks before because probably some Kirby shenaningas in Lylat, and so on, so on.
Yeah, i don't know now, but it makes me pretty sad, i off course understand concerns regarding some stages, i don't want the largest list possible, but i want to people leave the game to adapt and grow on his own avoiding off course the evident issues, like(banning stages with walkoffs or redudant ones, or to big ones, or with walls).
At the end they only care about themselves and only in their win rate and to be as lazy as possible when it comes to learn more than 6+ stages.
You know, i'm not proposing degenerate stages, lol, but i can only wish people could be more rational about this, and less self-conscious. For example, if you ask me for the moment 2GG is doing a great work, testing at least mixed hazards and testing some cool stages that deserve a shot, because i really doubt it they will prove degenerate. But then again, i don't know, if really people care about fairness, because if that's so they would have banned Bayonetta, but not (i'm not saying im am pro-banning bayonetta guy). But the attitude they have....point to that way but because is a character, she off course is more difficult to ban.
You will excuse me, and i know there is a lot of people out there who really cares about the scene as a whole, but sometimes who a community makes choices in such a short limit of time without experimenting and testing properly it just past me, i can't handle it. This is killing my hype for the game, but it would be dumb to keep depressed about that.
P.D: Posting again this list for the sake of exposure
https://twitter.com/2GGaming/status/1067147265041723393