LaserGuy
#59: Opens with RVS somitomi (this is a joke in reference to previous game and sign up thread), early opinions of three players (Wam, Gorf, Eido). +1
#80: Responds to questions, town lean for Swiss. Early opinions. +1
#106: Responds to Gorf, asks me about the points gambit. +0
#159: Responds to Gorf,
explains RVS vote to Swiss and unvotes, Eido newbie town. +0
#161: Ordered list with snap reads. +1
#180: bessie meta read, response to Gorf. +0
#181: Questions Wam’s reads list re Sabrar, fonti. +0
#226:
Responds to somitomi (awkward?), further questions bessie on points gambit (why?), responds to fonti and votes fonti with reasons. +1
#227: If fonti is scum, Wam is scum, no reasons given. -1
#273: Some responses to Gorf, fonti, will give detailed reads tomorrow. +0
#274: Response to bessie re Hari gambit. +0
#275: EBWOP. +0
#316: Detailed reads (extensive fonti scum read with added analysis on why Wam is buddy), ordered list, answers fonti’s yeet list questions. +1
#339: Some responses/clarification on fonti suspicion (I think these points are well thought out, but that in itself is NAI since they focus on meta). Also responds to bessie re gambit. +0
#391: Interested in fonti’s Swiss vote, but does not give any indication he is interested in switching. +0
#392: Re Maven. +0
#405: Drops Swiss scum shade but does not further question Swiss or move his vote. -1
#497: Resigned to somitomi yeet. +0
#524: Keeps vote on somitomi even though thereis an opportunity to switch to Swiss. +1
#545: Acknowledges hammer. +0
#553: Starts D2 with fonti vote for EoD Swiss push, wam and Swiss clear for positions on wagon. +1
#576: somi/fonti notes, I like this analysis. +1
#580: What was the point of post? It seems to contradict Laser’s fonti case. -1
#630: Question for Eido re scum pool, responses to Swiss. +1
#631: Response to Eido. +0
#651: Replies to fonti, Eido. +0
#655: Eido analysis, likes Eido but gets a buddy vibe with somitomi, unvotes fonti and switches suspicion to Eido. I don’t feel this post is sincere, but I see no reason to scum!Laser to switch from stronger fonti to Eido, when fonti yeet is still in play. +0
#656: Prods Eido to reply to #631. +0
#678: Finds Eido’s town read of fonti strange. +0
#679: Votes Eido but would prefer fonti. Why switch when fonti yeet is still in play? -1
#699: Reply to Eido, I agree with the reasoning but not the substance. -1
#700: Stating the obvious.
+0
#750: Follows Swiss and switches vote from Eido (L-1) to fonti. I like this switch because it was clear that I was going to push for Eido. +1
#811: Requests I verify a meta read of fonti, switches from fonti to Eido because Eido is the more likely yeet. -1
#817: Response to fonti. +0
#824: Response to fonti re EoD1 somitomi/Swiss pushes. +1
#876: Reply to Swiss re fonti. I like this analysis, though I wonder if referring to Synchronicity as a strong townie is an attempt to buddy. [haha, of course he means Zen not me
] Also agree with Laser’s view of night kill analysis. +1
#892: fonti townie ping (but I don’t think there is any other way for Laser to interpret fonti’s remark), request for Stellaris. +0
#903: I think this is a good response to fonti re somitomi. +1
#910: fonti scum by PoE.
I feel this is hedging, especially in light of his comments in #876. Laser doesn’t need to PoE fonti, he has reasons to scum read her. -1
#919: Reply to Swiss re bessie, valid analysis. +1
#941: Replies to Swiss. +0
#955: Reply to Swiss re Wam (Wam’s scum play is inconsistent), lukewarm meta analysis. +0
#1024: Wam read. Noncommittal town lean. +0
#1025: Some replies. +0
#1096: D3 fonti analysis and vote, I like this and feel Laser has valid points. +1
#1116: Response to fonti, I like this. +1
Response to criticism on content level, I feel that this is an unnecessary excuse. -1
#1163: Townreading both remaining players. Reply to Wam I agree with this. Asks about extension. +1
#1166: Formal extension request. +1
#1167: bessie analysis D1. Still questioning point gambit. Forgot about the shroop. I don’t see his somi analysis but I don’t do that type of read so meh.
Raises a good point re somi’s #518 I need to check this. I think this post is very uninspiring. -1
#1168: bessie analysis Part 2. Found shroop, makes some good points. +1
#1179: Explains assigning me a scum point, other good points. +1
#1181: D1 Wam analysis. I feel this post is looking at Wam’s content is not from a neutral point of view, but to read him as scum. But I feel the EOD vote analysis is valid. -1
#1182: EBWEP. +0
#1184: Reply to Wam. +0
#1189: Formal extension request. +1
#1192: Wam final analysis and vote. Meta analysis this game and other games. Overall I think this is a good case, I hesitate though because of my distrust of building a case so strongly on meta. +1
#1193: Odd observation. +0
#1194: Good observation. +1