IAm2Sarcastic4U
Smash Journeyman
Little Mac and Pac Man still aren't confirmed yet? *keeps waiting patiently*
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
So, considering it ... because he had a casual conversation with a journalist (one which probably mirrors similar conversations he has daily) ... he is "basically confirmed."Really? that's what it's come to? I knew this avatar would stir up some prejudice, but I also thought that people would be smart enough to know better...but anyway, I said that because he now seems to consider it. The word "confirmed" was used because I just want him in. SHEESH! Sakurai also seems to not have considered Lloyd too with his iffyness of Namco characters.
What makes you think Pac-Mans not confirmed?..Pac-Man and Mario has a history of being in 3 racing games together and Mario had a guest appearance in Pac-Man VS..So tell me why wouldin't he be in this game?So, considering it ... because he had a casual conversation with a journalist (one which probably mirrors similar conversations he has daily) ... he is "basically confirmed."
Right.
Because he's not CONFIRMEDWhat makes you think Pac-Mans not confirmed?
http://youtu.be/sBwwUfuJZr8E3 is over.
Rumor is now fake.
alright everyone, time to go home.
Seeing how Namco is helping with Smash 4 just like they did with the past games Mario and Pac-Man had appearance's in is more than a nuff to confirm pac-man will have an appearance in 4 i mean why not include the little yellow fellow it makes no since to leave him out.Because he's not appearanceD
ugh. SERIOUSLY?
Same.Can the both of you stop? Not to knock either of you but you both seem steadfast in sticking to your support/non-support no amount of arguing back and forth is going to change that.
But for the record I'm fairly sure that this is still gonna happen. All three of these seem to be very logical inclusions into the game.
confirming means that they are 100% proven to be in the game, and he is not as of right now. is that clear enough?Seeing how Namco is helping with Smash 4 just like they did with the past games Mario and Pac-Man had appearance's in is more than a nuff to confirm pac-man will have an appearance in 4 i mean why not include the little yellow fellow it makes no since to leave him out.
All three of those characters are still very possible inclusions, but if he claimed that they would all be revealed at E3 and they weren't, we need to assume that this rumor was bull until proven otherwise.Same.
The leaker was probably just told a bunch of characters that were finalised for Smash 4.
He didn't know which of the six would be revealed at E3 so he just said all of them.
The chance of it being a guess is still catastrophically low. At best the other three could be red herrings put in there by whoever told him.
Sakurai has stated that Namco characters have absolutely no special privileges. You clearly have no idea what confirmed means in this instance. Confirmed is when it is specifically shown or stated by the game's developers that the character is playable. I would be perfectly fine with the inclusion of Pac-Man, but at this point there are no shoe-ins. For arguments sake, here are some reasons not to include him. Sakurai has stated that it is an overwhelming amount of work to include a third party character. Also Pac-Man isn't really a Nintendo all-star, he is a video game all-star but not specifically Nintendo. There are other characters of more importance to Nintendo that have not been included.Seeing how Namco is helping with Smash 4 just like they did with the past games Mario and Pac-Man had appearance's in is more than a nuff to confirm pac-man will have an appearance in 4 i mean why not include the little yellow fellow it makes no since to leave him out.
I had said it would either be just Megaman or no one though I always leaned towards the latter. It's irrelevant either way.Well aware of that quote. But it does not mean there will be no more third party characters.
You claimed there will be ZERO third party characters while the rest of us said one or two more on top of Snake and Sonic.
The only things he was right about were things we already knew. There was no direct on the 10th. The direct in May came earlier and only mentioned the E3 direct in regards to E3. Yarn Yoshi also wasn't there. There were no Iwata Ask. Retro didn't do an interview.He didn't post anything about the source before but he did say he had one. Or rather that a "friend" had one.
Right here: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=58046232
Check the date and everything. It's beforehand.
I didn't say CONFIRMED I said ALMOST confirmed, I was EXAGGERATING. Geez, is that enough all caps for youconfirming means that they are 100% proven to be in the game, and he is not as of right now. is that clear enough?
he could very well be in the game. I promise not to complain much if he is for sure, but as of right now, I don't like it.
Sakurai has stated that Namco characters have absolutely no special privileges. You clearly have no idea what confirmed means in this instance. Confirmed is when it is specifically shown or stated by the game's developers that the character is playable. I would be perfectly fine with the inclusion of Pac-Man, but at this point there are no shoe-ins. For arguments sake, here are some reasons not to include him. Sakurai has stated that it is an overwhelming amount of work to include a third party character. Also Pac-Man isn't really a Nintendo all-star, he is a video game all-star but not specifically Nintendo. There are other characters of more importance to Nintendo that have not been included.
What makes you think Pac-Mans not confirmed?
You people.I didn't say CONFIRMED I said ALMOST confirmed, I was EXAGGERATING. Geez, is that enough all caps for you
But will those character's be balanced?I will be happy with every character choice Sakuraï do,because I know he will do great moveset,and he always make great character choice.
You people.
Yes. I am People-who-insist-on-the-near-confirmation-on-a-character-who-isn't-even-thatsist.What do you mean you people?!
People got into a lot of trouble with that during Brawl.Yes. I am People-who-insist-on-the-near-confirmation-on-a-character-who-isn't-even-thatsist.
Not entirely sure what you're talking about here.I might as not say that word because it brings bad thing when ever it is sprinkled on a sentence.c******d is the newest swear word guys, i thought u knew.
Here I go explaining myself again, I meant that I should stop saying confirmed. But, the rumor being wrong doesn't phaze me, pac -man still has a good chance. ;-)Not entirely sure what you're talking about here.
Anyways, back to the topic of this newly debunked rumor.
How does everyone feel about it?
There's no doubting he has a ~good chance.I
Here I go explaining myself again, I meant that I should stop saying confirmed. But, the rumor being wrong doesn't phaze me, pac -man still has a good chance. ;-)
210stuna[I said:][/I]
But will those character's be balanced?
Let's keep FLUDD in for teh lulz said Sakurai during his lunch break
At the bottom right corner of the post you want to quote, there's a "Reply" link.Sorry for DP,but how we quote other people?
Yep, it is. Looks like it's a fake.Is E3 over yet? Or do I have to hate Pacman for another day?
You said he never claimed to have a source until after his "guess" was right.The only things he was right about were things we already knew. There was no direct on the 10th. The direct in May came earlier and only mentioned the E3 direct in regards to E3. Yarn Yoshi also wasn't there. There were no Iwata Ask. Retro didn't do an interview.
This kind of proves he never had a source and just got lucky.
Yeah, and his source was dead wrong.You said he never claimed to have a source until after his "guess" was right.
My link proves otherwise. He said his friend had a source earlier.
Yeah, but was wrong on absolutely everything. The only reason it doesn't look so bad was because he never mentioned a game that we didn't already know about. Even with a game we did know about, Yarn Yoshi, he was still wrong.It certainly doesn't prove he never had a source. While it does hurt it's credibility to a degree.
But ofcourse leaked information can sometimes be wrong because things change or the information was misinterpreted.
Information as unlikely as the info given which is proven correct on the other hand is pretty strong proof.