given there aren't many people playing in montgomery, i'd think i'd be a suitable place to hold an event where each of these regions in bama collect since it's in the center of the state.
That's what pretty much everyone has been saying since '09. Too bad no one plays smash in state's second largest city and it is a black hole where they all suck corn and smell like hot dog water.
What's wrong with my system? I see it as accurate, and non-discriminate. If we decide to split into regions, we will have no way to judge a mobile player against a player from Tuscaloosa. A tier list would be difficult to run, and would not be accurate for seeding purposes.
The problem is that you system is not as accurate as you think it is. I just made 110 points for coming in second at a tournament where no one was good. That probably puts me above Tope, Ajred and Roboturner, of whom I struggle to take games off. It doesn't account for J00t or Reflex or Rag, who could show up to most tournaments and walk away with easy money. It also ranks out of stater's in an Alabama PR. RAM is moving to California in 2 weeks. And, even though I'm all for rewarding tournament attendance, your system basically assures anyone who can make more events huge chunks of points.
Honestly though, the individual ranks are extremely arbitrary. There is no way I can say I am better or worse than Spade. The last time we played was probably a year and a half ago, so my position relative to him cannot possibly be absolutely defined. I don't think numbers exist in the same space as a tier list. We are not robots and our gameplay changes every time we pick up the controller.
As it's been said before, our state is too decided for any kind of unified PR, but if we were going to pursue one I would probably just go with a tier list. It's the most arbitrary and is better at getting the point across that these sets of players are somewhere near the same skill level without implying that we know exactly where any one player sits.