• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

'Act of Aggression' from North Korea sinking South Korean ship

Mic_128

Wake up...
Administrator
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 19, 2002
Messages
46,183
Location
Steam
North Korea has threatened "full-scale war" after an international report concluded a torpedo fired by one of the reclusive regime's submarines sank a South Korean navy ship in March.

A multinational team of independent investigators concluded that North Korea was behind the sinking of the 1,200-tonne corvette Cheonan that killed 46 sailors.

The international team, including five Australian Defence Force personnel and experts from America, Britain and Sweden, analysed the shattered hull and parts of a torpedo found on the sea bed.

The investigators say fragments, lettering and propellers on the torpedo match North Korean-manufactured torpedos acquired by the South seven years ago.

"There is no other plausible explanation," a joint civilian and military investigation report said.

Seoul is now expected to seek tough new sanctions against Pyongyang.

The Yonhap news agency, which monitors North Korean media, said the North's National Defence Commission (NDC) broadcast a statement describing the report as a "fabrication".

The NDC, chaired by leader Kim Jong-Il, is the most powerful state organ in the communist North.

In a statement, the NDC threatened to respond to any future small border incident with a "merciless, strong, physical blow".

"Our army and people will promptly react to any punishment and retaliation and to any sanctions infringing upon our state interests with various forms of tough measures including full-scale war," it said.

Its statement described the South's president, Lee Myung-Bak, as a "traitor".

The North said it would send its own investigators to the South to check the purported evidence.

In Seoul, Mr Lee vowed resolute counter-measures against North Korea in response to the report's findings.
Great, just what we need, another war.
 

Pluvia

Hates Semicolons<br>;
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
7,677
Location
Mass Effect Thread
Full-scale war? AKA North Korea Vs Everyone Else more like.

I'm usually very left and not war hungry at all but I say we kick Kim Jong out before he acquires nukes.
 

Virgilijus

Nonnulli Laskowski praestant
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Messages
14,387
Location
Sunny Bromsgrove
North Korea just makes me sad; the citizens there are completely brainwashed into believing their country and leaders are great and superior, but live in poverty and starvation and now may be soon at war. Poor guys :(
 

Sephiroths Masamune

Shocodoro Blagshidect
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
7,683
Location
In Sephiroth's hands.
I see a war on our hands, and this time it wont be guerrilla sneak attacks like in Iraq and Afghanistan. This might be the biggest one, WWIII? I hope there are no Nuclear strikes. Does NK have any allies?
 

El Nino

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 4, 2003
Messages
1,289
Location
Ground zero, 1945
I'm usually very left and not war hungry at all but I say we kick Kim Jong out before he acquires nukes.
1. They already have nukes.

2. This is not likely to escalate into a full-scale war. Don't fall into the trap of believing everything the N. Korean government says. They have to put up a strong front so that their own citizens believe in them, or else their power could crumble. A nation in economic shambles does not wage war because it cannot sustain the costs of military operations. I think the government of N. Korea knows this.

Note also that they did not want to accept responsibility for the attack. It could be that they are actually trying to forestall both military action and sanctions by the South. If they had been interested in going to war, they could have come right out and said that they did it, but that they were justified because of reasons A, B and C.

3. China is one of N. Korea's allies, and China has an invested interest in preventing an East Asian war because a war would destabilize the region and threaten their economy.
 

UberMario

Smash Master
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
3,312
The scary thing about this is if a war indeed breaks out with North Korea, China is almost sure to join the mix somehow and all chaos will ensue economically worldwide.
 

victra♥

crystal skies
Joined
Jan 20, 2007
Messages
14,275
Location
Edmonton
Slippi.gg
victra#0
darn, i was about to share this article =p

yeah its awful. I feel so bad for the citizens of North Korea as well. Their leaders are totally asking for it, and if a war breaks out...its going to be horrible. :/
 

Sephiroths Masamune

Shocodoro Blagshidect
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
7,683
Location
In Sephiroth's hands.
3. China is one of N. Korea's allies, and China has an invested interest in preventing an East Asian war because a war would destabilize the region and threaten their economy.
The scary thing about this is if a war indeed breaks out with North Korea, China is almost sure to join the mix somehow and all chaos will ensue economically worldwide.
I wonder if we would have to pay off our dept to china if we went to war with them?

Going to war with china is the worlds worse nightmare, even though most country's think they deserve it do to their hostile takeover of Tibet. But the reason we don't fight them is because the rate of inflation would skyrocket, without cheep labor most of the companies around the world would go bankrupt. The state of the US economy would be 10 times worse than it is now.
 

CRASHiC

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
7,267
Location
Haiti Gonna Hait
North Korea may have the bomb, but they have no allies. China isn't going to back North Korea up, they have continually asked North Korea to hault the building of its military programs. They only want North Korea's money and their docks, they don't give a rats *** about the country itself. They share nothing more than a professional arrangement. China's no fool, they aren't going to put their economics success and future at stake for their two bit nothing neighbor.

Example: It came time for China to pick a side, the western world or North Korea. China picked us. China's in it for themselves and only themselves. Any "allies" they have are nothing in truth. They are a proud, solitary nation, because they can chose to be.

I'm placing my money on South all day.
 

OizenX

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Sep 29, 2009
Messages
292
Location
The Place where nothing happens.
North Korea is the Hermit Country. It believes in making no allies, starving your people and treating them like garbage is the best way to go. Well obviously they've already (or are close too) got their hands on the Nuclear Bomb. I wonder when they'll use it.

For all this china talk, China wouldn't side with them. The United states is their cash cow. Notice how everything is "Made in China". Killing your customers isn't the best way to make money.
 

El Nino

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 4, 2003
Messages
1,289
Location
Ground zero, 1945
Sometimes I wonder what they're teaching you kids in school these days. Probably the same BS they taught me.

Not much to be done about that, is there?
 

CRASHiC

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
7,267
Location
Haiti Gonna Hait
Sometimes I wonder what they're teaching you kids in school these days. Probably the same BS they taught me.

Not much to be done about that, is there?
What reason would China have to side with N. Korea? Even during the cold war China wasn't blind to follow countries with similar doctrines. China's relationship with Korea is only to prevent one thing: Korean refugees. Having Korea fall apart would be bad for China, as it would destablise the region, increase the number of workers in an already worker surplus enviroment, and of course lose them some pocket change. If China REALLY wanted Korea to prosper, then why was it so apt to pressure China into ridding itself of Nuclear Missiles? China cares not for N. Korea. China cares only for itself. China will not side with North Korea on this, have no doubt. They have no reason to.
 

CRASHiC

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
7,267
Location
Haiti Gonna Hait
If someone attacks Japan, its litterally our responsibility legally. Don't joke about that. An attack on Japan forces us to go to war.
 

Fuelbi

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
16,894
Location
Also PIPA and CISPA
If they do go to war, I suspect that it'll at least help out the economic conditions a bit if it ends up being like the US when we entered WWII where we got over teh depression pretty quickly from the opening of jobs


I can already feel WWIII: NK vs. Everyone Else

Dang it, someone already said that :mad:
 

El Nino

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 4, 2003
Messages
1,289
Location
Ground zero, 1945
This thread just gets funnier and funnier.

China cares only for itself.
No ****.

For the record, all nation-states care only for themselves.

And please don't misinterpret me; I didn't make it clear, but I wasn't disagreeing with that part of your assertion, as noted below:

3. China is one of N. Korea's allies, and China has an invested interest in preventing an East Asian war because a war would destabilize the region and threaten their economy.
They already have nukes?
I'm not sure if they have openly said it, but they have done many missle tests, and its obvious they are trying to develop it.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6032525.stm

Old news is old.

Aw well, nothing we can do but sit around and ***** at them now.
That's what the world's been saying about the U.S. since 1945.

N. Korea having nukes changes very little. Nukes are most valuable as deterrents to ground invasions. You can't launch them at another nuclear country because they will launch back at you.
 

Jam Stunna

Writer of Fortune
BRoomer
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
6,450
Location
Hartford, CT
3DS FC
0447-6552-1484
The point of a war in the Korean peninsula isn't whether or not the US and China will get involved, but how much damage would be done in the week or so that hostilities would last. N. Korea has over ten thousand artillery pieces aimed at Seoul.

This won't become a war, but no one should doubt that while China wouldn't start sending troops, they would definitely want to see a quick end to war for N. Korea's (and their own) sake, not because of Western interests.

United States is pretty prideful in caring about **** that's none of its business, such as Jerusalem.

But that's off topic sooo.
Jerusalem is totally the United States' business.
 

Fuelbi

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
16,894
Location
Also PIPA and CISPA
N. Korea having nukes changes very little. Nukes are most valuable as deterrents to ground invasions. You can't launch them at another nuclear country because they will launch back at you.
This is why we're supposed use nukes on other countries that don't have em :dizzy:
 

CRASHiC

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
7,267
Location
Haiti Gonna Hait
the point of Nukes isn't to use Nukes. Using a nuke puts a ton of burden on the country who pushed the button, unless they take over the world. Its heavily looked down upon, and would result in the countries alienation UNLESS they more than aptly compensated the country, as we did with Japan. Nukes are a way to inlist fear, nothing more. If Regan knew one thing, it was war. He understood the concept that the best way to win a war is to avoid a war completely while still trumping your enemy. That's how he used the american military, bluffs about out anti-nuke program (star wars hahahaha), as well as our own Nuke program.
 

El Nino

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 4, 2003
Messages
1,289
Location
Ground zero, 1945
This is why we're supposed use nukes on other countries that don't have em :dizzy:
Well, it worked in 1945. Nothing went wrong there.

I don't see how, except for that we caused the whole mess by taking the land in WWII. We still don't really benefit from their relationship.
They are an ally of the U.S. in a very strategic location, a location made strategic by that one precious commodity that powers everyone's cars.

the point of Nukes isn't to use Nukes. Using a nuke puts a ton of burden on the country who pushed the button, unless they take over the world. Its heavily looked down upon, and would result in the countries alienation UNLESS they more than aptly compensated the country, as we did with Japan. Nukes are a way to inlist fear, nothing more. If Regan knew one thing, it was war. He understood the concept that the best way to win a war is to avoid a war completely while still trumping your enemy. That's how he used the american military, bluffs about out anti-nuke program (star wars hahahaha), as well as our own Nuke program.
I am curious why you think that political and military leaders are deterred from using nuclear weapons because it would make them "heavily looked down upon." The U.S. is heavily looked down upon for a lot of its policies, but it continues to carry them out because it doesn't matter how someone looks at you--it only matters whether or not they can realistically stop or punish you.
 

Mota

"The snake, knowing itself, strikes swiftly"
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
4,063
Location
Australia | Melb
Hmm looks serious.

Just wondering Crashic, or anyone else, how did America compensate Japan?
 

Mic_128

Wake up...
Administrator
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 19, 2002
Messages
46,183
Location
Steam
These are the reasons why America feels like it needs to police the world, because people are suffering in other countries because of their government.
Because America is perfect and no one suffers under the U.S.'s government?
 

El Nino

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 4, 2003
Messages
1,289
Location
Ground zero, 1945
But don't the north koreans have the impression that they're living in a wonderful country due to the propaganda?
Don't most Americans think the same about their own country?

And many that do have never actually set foot outside of their own borders. Yet comments like this one are so prevalent:

Or at least not as badly as most other countries.
Maybe Mr.Freeman has traveled the world, but I meet a lot of people saying the same thing when they haven't.

National Geographic put out an article about the country of Somalia a while ago. Readers were surprised at the level of fortitude and faith that the people living there have in their own countrymen and in their nation, the commitment they have towards building up their communities.

Similarly, many families who were forced to relocate to the U.S. due to war--whether they came from Laos, China or Afghanistan--often dream about going back. Many Americans seem to balk at that notion. "Why do you want to go back to that ****hole? Isn't there a war going on? Isn't the government oppressive?"

It's like when an American reporter went to Haiti after the quake, and he asked his guide, a 12 year old girl, whether she wanted to leave the country. She said, "No. Haiti is a beautiful country."

I don't know why that always seems to be the first words out of an American news reporter's mouth when they interview people in other countries during a crisis (I've seen it more than once). I also don't know what it is about education or media or culture that gives rise to that prevailing idea in the U.S. that America is the shining bedrock of civilization while every other piece of land on terrestrial earth is a seething pool of degeneracy, but even in people who fled their home countries as war refugees and landed in the U.S., even in them there is often a powerful draw to go back to the homeland. It seems that only foreigners are so willing to abandon a place as a "lost cause." But people are often rooted to the places where they were born, to the culture that gave them identity. The daily struggles that they deal with--oppression, brutality, censorship, landmines, car bombs--are just the daily struggles of life itself. In this world, no one is entitled to anything. You play the hand that you are dealt. It's as simple as that.

That's not to mention the other industrialized nations in the world (much of Western Europe, parts of Asia, parts of North Africa, Australia, parts of South America) where the standard of living is also fairly high.
 
Top Bottom