gnosis, you vegan sympathizer. I'm coming to Idaho to hunt you down. You and your potatoes!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Actually, this just caught my eye.Let me introduce you to a little something called the Food Chain:
![]()
Great points, but too much flame.I've read so much about this debate I've grown tired of it.
A huge group of hate mongers try to drag out the vegetarians and throw a witch hunt. In this digital age witch hunt they are armed with poor spelling/grammar instead of torches and pitchforks. Then they somehow expect us to take their side.
Someone will say "don't be so mean."
They'll be called a witch, I mean, a vegan, which most of the time they are not.
Someone else will quote Maddox and become a failure to think freely because of it.
And I provide information on why vegetarianism helps economics, ecology, health, and provide other information such as well known vegetarians ranging from Newton to Paul McCartney.
Then nobody will budge from their views, but maybe some of us would get out some of that pent up tension by burning some witches.
I don't eat animal products. I've become healthier since I cut out the meat and as a bonus I don't have any guilt about eating meat for any of the many reasons associated with it. And more importantly, I don't care if you do OR don't. Quit bothering everyone about what they should do and just make yourself an example.
I agree that as a whole, vegetarians tend to have healthier habits than their non-vegetarian humans.Great points, but too much flame.
Vegetarians just have better health habits, eating less meat doesn't exactly make you healthier.
Actually, Vegans get more than enough proteins. Vegetarians get more still. And those who eat meat statistically get too much. Practically everything anyone eats is made up of proteins, even celery. The old protein argument ended in the 1970's, but people who are uninformed still parade around thinking it's correct.Vegetarians have a harder time getting protein and various nutrients and vitamins.
That's actually an interesting proposal. People need to treat people with respect, and, personally, I don't see why anyone would seperate the world into what we can and cannot respect--people, animals, plants, etc. Cruelty is cruelty and it eventually comes back to hurt us.Yo guys I'm gonna make a group called PETP, People for the Ethical Treatment of People.
Please lose the attitude, the reductio ad absurdium exaggerations, and the ad hominem attacks. Everyone, when debating with/responding to somebody on the internet, has a tendency to do these things. They only help create hostility and start flame wars.Actually, Vegans get more than enough proteins. Vegetarians get more still. And those who eat meat statistically get too much. Practically everything anyone eats is made up of proteins, even celery. The old protein argument ended in the 1970's, but people who are uninformed still parade around thinking it's correct.
It really doesn't take any time thinking about what to eat, so it doesn't make vegetarians eat any less. I've never seen anyone spend an entire day deciding if they could or could not eat any soup, no matter what eating habits they have.
Here you're twisting my words. I did not say they spend time thinking about what to eat, or that they will take all day deciding what to eat. I said they'll think twice.It really doesn't take any time thinking about what to eat, so it doesn't make vegetarians eat any less. I've never seen anyone spend an entire day deciding if they could or could not eat any soup, no matter what eating habits they have.
The point wasn't that celery is enough to sustain yourself on, it was that practically everything you would eat has protein. The protein argument isn't debated anymore except by people who have no better way of saying vegetarianism is unhealthy, which it isn't, so it's going to be bound to failure.erm, I'm not sure that celery has much protein. I would have thought that veggies are mostly carbohydrates or something. Although I don't really know.
Aha I found it: http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/nutrientfull.php?id=11143
Celery had .75 grams of protein per 100 grams of celery, .75%.
So I don't think you would be able to survive on celery alone.
By the way, are vegetarians supposed to exclude animal oil from their diet too?
Sorry, that's not attitude, it's personality. Using Latin phrases doesn't make you seem intelligent either, so you should lose that.Please lose the attitude, the reductio ad absurdium exaggerations, and the ad hominem attacks. Everyone, when debating with/responding to somebody on the internet, has a tendency to do these things. They only help create hostility and start flame wars.
Really? Where did you find these statistics? I read about it, and, additionally, can attest for myself that I get plenty of protein. There are plenty of books and internet sources that will show you statistically vegans get plenty of proteins. I myself have nothing to worry about in that regards. (see celery argument above for more information why)Anyway, what you've said is simply not true. Vegans don't get "more than enough" protein, or other nutrients. The fact is, vegans cut out of their diet most things which contain them.
No, I don't agree with you.Meat, eggs, and dairy are great sources of protein; lacto-ovo vegetarians can get them from the two latter sources, but vegans cannot. Vegans must get it from lentils, grains, soy, legumes, etc. I hope you'll agree with me when I say that these do not contain a lot of protein and a vegan must eat more of it to get an adequate amount.
It's actually more work to raise a cow by growing a lot of vegetatian, go through the butchering process, and then the long process of cooking the cow rather than eat an ear of corn.I'm not saying that vegans/vegetarians can't get protein and other nutrients, I'm saying it's harder for them to get it. There are also several other vitamins, minerals, and nutrients that vegans and vegetarians must work harder to get.
Doctors are some of the worst people to ask about nutrition. They know only basic, and rather outdated knowledge on nutrition as they are not formally trained to study such areas of school. This is why there exists nutrtionists, dieticians, and other complimentary/alternative physicians. However, that would just be an opinion, but the statement you quoted still contradicts that B-12, calcium, iron, and zinc are all found in vegan diets (very easily, might I add).A quote from the Mayo Clinic's website on vegan and vegetarian diets:
"The more restrictive a diet is, the more difficult it is to get all the nutrients your body needs. A vegan diet, for example, eliminates food sources of vitamin B-12, as well as milk products, which are a good source of calcium. Other nutrients, such as iron and zinc, are available in a meatless diet, but you need to make an extra effort to ensure they're in yours."
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/vegetarian-diet/HQ01596
I didn't twist your words, you were unclear.Here you're twisting my words. I did not say they spend time thinking about what to eat, or that they will take all day deciding what to eat. I said they'll think twice.
For example, after one of my friends went vegan, it took me a little while to get used to his new eating habits, and conversations such as the following took place:
Me: "Hey, I just got a bag of M&Ms... you want some?"
Friend: "No thanks, I can't have milk chocolate."
Quoted For ****ing Truth.I've read so much about this debate I've grown tired of it.
A huge group of hate mongers try to drag out the vegetarians and throw a witch hunt. In this digital age witch hunt they are armed with poor spelling/grammar instead of torches and pitchforks. Then they somehow expect us to take their side.
Someone will say "don't be so mean."
They'll be called a witch, I mean, a vegan, which most of the time they are not.
Someone else will quote Maddox and become a failure to think freely because of it.
And I provide information on why vegetarianism helps economics, ecology, health, and provide other information such as well known vegetarians ranging from Newton to Paul McCartney.
Then nobody will budge from their views, but maybe some of us would get out some of that pent up tension by burning some witches.
I don't eat animal products. I've become healthier since I cut out the meat and as a bonus I don't have any guilt about eating meat for any of the many reasons associated with it. And more importantly, I don't care if you do OR don't. Quit bothering everyone about what they should do and just make yourself an example.
First of all, that's not true. Secondly, if you were referring to my quoting the Mayo Clinic... it's not relevant to say "doctors are the worst people to ask about nutrition" even if they really were the worst people to ask about nutrition (which they're not). The Mayo Clinic, like other famous and prestigious research institutions, is exactly that: a research institution. It is a place where doctors, scientists, and medical scientists perform research. It is like me quoting, say, Harvard or Washington University at STL or the UConn Health Center and being told that it's not relevant because "they don't know about nutrition".Doctors are some of the worst people to ask about nutrition.
Well of course; my point was that these things add up. Too much chocolate and sugar, or for that matter, overnourishment, are bad for you.And not eating M&M's is not putting your friend's health in danger. I am quite sure of this.
A 99-gram serving of cooked lentils contains about 9g of protein; less than 10% by mass. An extra lean hamburger, weighing 170g, contains 48.6g of protein, or almost 30% protein by mass. A roasted chicken is about 25% protein by mass. Soy milk is less than 3% protein by mass. Cooked split peas are 8.3% protein by mass. Grains tend to be 5-10% protein by mass. A cooked ear of corn? Less than 3.4% protein by mass.No, I don't agree with you.
Some of the foods you listed are considered high-protein foods.
Yes, there are ailments caused by too much protein. Because it would be outright wrong to say that a vegetarian/vegan diet has no advantages, I will say that this is true.You will also find ailments linked to consumption of too much protein.
thanks for adding so much to the conversation.Screw PETA. Next they'll be telling us what to drink. Imagine what will happen to farmers if this happens. Stupid PETA, meat is good.
But the fact is, veganism/vegetarianism IS NOT A BAD DIET. That's not at all what I've been trying to say. It can be a very healthy diet. NON-VEGETARIANISM is NOT A BETTER DIET. If you eat too much meat, it can be unhealthy. But if you control what you eat, if you eat healthy, then it too can be a good diet.
He's not using Latin phrases to sound smart, he's using Latin phrases because they're appropriate. It's not Goldshadow's fault you don't know what they mean.Sorry, that's not attitude, it's personality. Using Latin phrases doesn't make you seem intelligent either, so you should lose that.
The issue is not pure amount of protein but also types of protein found in foods. Many vegetables are limited in one or more types of essential amino acids. For example, legumes are considered a relatively high protein plant, but they lack tryptophan:Really? Where did you find these statistics? I read about it, and, additionally, can attest for myself that I get plenty of protein. There are plenty of books and internet sources that will show you statistically vegans get plenty of proteins. I myself have nothing to worry about in that regards. (see celery argument above for more information why)
Nice strawman, can I borrow it for Halloween? Eating meat != having a steak for dinner every night.You will also find ailments linked to consumption of too much protein, which would worry me if I was eating a steak for dinner every night instead of a nice curry.
That's not he was saying. The point is that it's a lot easier for a human to obtain those same proteins by eating a cow vs. eating corn.It's actually more work to raise a cow by growing a lot of vegetatian, go through the butchering process, and then the long process of cooking the cow rather than eat an ear of corn.
And what makes you think the Mayo Clinic doesn't employ any nutritionists and dieticians?Doctors are some of the worst people to ask about nutrition. They know only basic, and rather outdated knowledge on nutrition as they are not formally trained to study such areas of school. This is why there exists nutrtionists, dieticians, and other complimentary/alternative physicians.
Indeed!Not only that, but the preparation of meat foods can easily be a social activity. You don't invite people over to grill celery and carrots.
QFTAlso, meat is good. Yummy.
QFT x 2.Finally, the one point you cannot argue, is that meat is DELICIOUS.
Your welcome.thanks for adding so much to the conversation.