URGH, I was about to post something similiar to that!So it's ok because you are a member? So if you were in the KKK, but not an active member, that's ok?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
URGH, I was about to post something similiar to that!So it's ok because you are a member? So if you were in the KKK, but not an active member, that's ok?
I wasn't joking at all. I'm a heartless person. I've seen some ****ed up **** in my life. The few people that know me best will profess that I am bad company.:o...dude, that's not funny...is this all you have to say after a little girl is killed? A child that could have lived a fulfilling and happy life, only to be cut short by a drunken babysitter? I'm disgusted...
wow, get *****
xP
XD That's terrible but funny.has anyone said this yet:
fatality
props to you
has anyone said this yet:
fatality
blasphemy.You know what I thought when I first read that?
Why would even want to copy MK. The game sucks. It sucked back when it first came out and it sucks now.
I do believe that sums it up.No, this is natural selection - Evolution in the making.
Stupid people should not be allowed to have kids, and when they do, those kids die. The babysitters are the products of this stupidity in that if they were properly raised, they would not have murdered a child. Alcohol aside, they are still responsible for their actions and they deserve to rot in prison. The only benefit of this little girl dying is that she is no longer the victim of abuse as the article stated she was often bruised and hated to go home. Tragic story.
He probably gave up cuz I hadn't seen or heard of that guy in so long.Why hasn't Jack Thompson gotten fired up about this?
Too busy vacationing in Vegas.Why hasn't Jack Thompson gotten fired up about this?
Well, they were drunk, from what I hear...so that doesn't sound too farfetched...knowing how society is about video games and violence, it would seem possible...They probably just got mad at the kid for crying or smarting off (dang kids these days and their disrepectful mouths), and beat the kid up. They then thought they could use the good 'ole "video games made me do it" to try and get out of it.
OK then.This is obviously a real tragedy, but it really pisses me off to hear smashers i respect say things like
"if they dont get life or death, i will have lost all faith in the american judicial system."
OH COME ON!!! COME THE F**K ON!!!
Obviously they should go to jail; they need to be taught for their mistakes, but you guys need to understand that (unless this is a bigger story than we think) they didnt mean to cause any harm to anyone. THEY DONT DESERVE LIFE. Innocent until proven guilty (i am not referring to the crime, but to the motives and events causing them).
I'm quite a small guy, and my brother is huge (unlike the rest of our family). We used to wrestle around and stuff like that, but often it would end up in me hurt for some reason. Why? Because he couldn't control his strength every now and then, and i was a mouse. I guess he forgot who i was and started playing around like he would with his friends, without realizing how much weaker i was. If i punched him, he barely felt it. If he lightly punches me, i go to the floor. That 7 year old girl sounds very very fragile. If they weren't drunk, then I'd agree with all of you. But they were.
If i had all of the details on this story, then i would be much more confident in what i'm saying; but i cant be sure that they arent just complete idiots or if they had one too many (or both).
What im trying to say (and doing a poor job of it) is that you can't be sure either. You have no right to judge them. You don't know what happened. You didnt know them. And in situations like that, i like to think of the worst possible scenario. For the teenagers, that is that they are generally good people, then they make one false move, and then get sentenced to jail for life, rotting in a cell wishing that they could die. Is that fair? F**k no!!!
I would ask how you (whoever is reading this) would feel if it happened to you; but most would arrogantly say "nono i'm not that stupid. It would never happen to me." I bet if you said that to one of the teenagers before the accident, they would say the same thing. Stupidity is subjective; no one thinks they are, but they think everyone else is. Its quite bothering, for me at least.
phew, had to get that out; had to rant about something. I was reading a few topics in the debate hall and really wanted to reply, but i realised i didnt have access yet...
In short: they deserve a second chance in life sometime in the future.
For starters, 7 year old and girl are the same thing. Unless you think its ok to hit 7 year old boys.OK then.
Why the f*** did they drink alcohol then? They're UNDERAGED. Stupid strike number one.
Why hit a GIRL? No morals. Stupid strike number two.
Why hit a 7-year old? Child abuse. Stupid strike number three.
If not life in prison or the death sentence, I hope you can at least agree with me when I say they should have the living s*** beat out of them. If I could, I'd be more than happy to help out in that regard.
Girls and 7 year-olds are actually different. I wouldn't hit a girl of any age and I certainly wouldn't hit a 7 year-old. But I suppose being drunk (and I've BEEN drunk before so they had to be pretty freaking drunk) is a valid excuse for the incident but that doesn't mean any of this was ok.For starters, 7 year old and girl are the same thing. Unless you think its ok to hit 7 year old boys.
Anyway, its not that i'm trying to defend them severely. I just think that we dismiss others so quickly these days.
Neither of us knows what happened, or what was going though their minds. I don't know if they are stupid or not. Thats not the point. The point is because we dont know, we should assume that they are just normal teenagers.
Now to counter your points.
Why drink alcohol? I dont know. Thats a completely valid point, and does reflect on their ability to make good decisions. In short, you are completely right on that one. I never got why underage teens drink anyway...
Now for the other two. If they hadn't been drinking? Then they are valid points. BUT because they were drinking (for whatever reason) they most likely could not perceive the danger of hitting the girl, let alone the identity of the little girl. They might have just hallucinated and seen a punching bag, or something, i dont know.
Since everyone takes alcohol differently, it is likely they were both highly intoxicated, and unable to make correct decisions. You cannot judge someone by their behaviour while drunk. If a girl gets drunk and someone ***** her, is she stupid?? Same thing.
Anyway, i cant agree with you nor disagree with you saying that they should be beaten, as i dont know how badly they will be beaten. Supreme torture? lets reserve that for Hitler. A light tap on the wrists? They wont learn their lesson.
So yeah.
I agree completely.The problem isn't the video game. It isn't alcohol either. It's the teenagers that did the beating. I've played my share of video games, listened to metal and rap music, and drank alcohol. I never did something that would hurt a small child (much like my 9 year old sister) when under the influence of anything. There's something wrong with the teenager that killed the small child to make her think that something like what she did was acceptable behavior. Yet, people try to blame the event on things such as video games, music, and alcohol, which can't cause a crime in and of themselves. Plenty of people in the world get drunk playing video games and listening to music. Events like these are pretty rare.