Delta-cod
Smash Hero
Don't forget PK Jump (lagless aerial PKF).
Also, camping doesn't necessarily mean throwing projectiles.
Also, camping doesn't necessarily mean throwing projectiles.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Salem wins apex2013, hype is back and ZSS is seen as a beast character once again (outside of the players making excuses for salem and crying about it). Salem after that has not done much to that level since then.
Might wanna read my post more carefully. I said on a level of what he did at apex. And his recent tournament results add not met up with his title for apex Best player in the world takes a world wide tournament. But can't take locals and regionals? SKTAR he got 33rd. before that I think he got 25th or 17th at a local losing to Keitaro and Nakat. For someone who managed to sit in winners from start to finish at a world wide tournament,, taking out some killers then to go to locals, regionals and not be able to destroy that as well? Thats why people are second guessing him and the hype for this character once again fades.I guess beating M2K, ZeRo (twice), ADHD, Bloodcross and MVD after Apex doesn't count as much then.
You got it backwards. Peach should not be float happy vs olimar. That will get her destroyed. People think with peach they have to be floating to everything thrown at them. Thats a lie. There are certain times you just can't. And when they get shut down for it, they don't know what to do. So just keep trying and hoping for the best. You have to think outside the box. And alot play her flowchart happy. By now people know how to deal with that type of play. And Peach players don't don't really get anywhere. Or do as good as they SHOULD be.@D.Pch: I really want to hear about Peach vs Olimar. I do not quite understand why its in her favor. I understand that float can neglect a variety of Olimar's main spacing methods like grab or smashes. But float only lasts so long and I do not get why Olimar cannot simply wait out Peach to land, then reach in.
I'm fairly certain the win against MVD was the weekend after SKTARMVD JUST did something big with SKTAR unless he has gone to tournaments and done something equal to that before. if he hasn't, beating him in the past does not get him mega points. Good **** to MVD getting second ( I swear I have to say this cause people ALWAYS wanna take what I say the wrong way) But I wanna see him do it again. I said the same thing about salem whem he beat M2K. I wanna see them fight again and see the results of it. And it came down to salem having his number. So that part was no fluke. If MVD can do something like that again, and Salem manages to beat him, then I can say that is a big win for salem.
I'd believe Marth, but I'm incredulous regarding Pikachu. What matchups make her more relevant than a great Falco/Snake CP? Or is it just a more even MU spread overall?ZSS is better than Marth and Pikachu
Revive the best thread to ever come to smashboards: http://smashboards.com/threads/the-top-5-brawl-us-can-mex.296541/The television used for the sktar stream was discarded two weeks later due to it being found to lag.
#conspiracytheoriesandflorida'sLCDTVPractise
I support this notionRevive the best thread to ever come to smashboards: http://smashboards.com/threads/the-top-5-brawl-us-can-mex.296541/
Not this one though. Make flaocmaster666 the thread owner.And make me owner of the thread!
The mods will likely close it instantly like they did every other time somebody tried that.Copy paste the thread and make yourself the owner by making a new one.
Not auto-losing to MK for oneI'd believe Marth, but I'm incredulous regarding Pikachu. What matchups make her more relevant than a great Falco/Snake CP? Or is it just a more even MU spread overall?
pls do this, or at the very least unlock the thread. Idc who the owner is, that thread was so great.Revive the best thread to ever come to smashboards: http://smashboards.com/threads/the-top-5-brawl-us-can-mex.296541/
And make me owner of the thread!
PLLLLLLEEEEEEEEAAAAAAASEEEEEE??? :3Probably not going to happen
That is true but I have watched that replay without hacks on and the exactly same thing happens if you are willing to believe me. Also, ZSS having a pretty consistent way of going through also backs it up that it's indeed possible to go through accidentally or not.Edit 2:@Draver: I would be more inclined to think about that happenstance were it not on a hacked wii...
It's not an auto loss, but it's certainly not even either. And if we're going strictly by results, ZSS does do better. Neither character is in danger of consistently beating MKs that know the matchup well, though.Not auto-losing to MK for one
No.Also the MU is even.
Err, I'm sorry, WHAT?!? He plays Seibrik on a regular basis and has squared off against the best MKs from all over (and outside) the country. If this doesn't count as sufficient exerience, I can't see how your sessions with Tyrant possibly could. Either that, or ESAM is a very slow learner (despite being amazing at every other aspect of the game).ESAM's understanding of fighting MK could be better, its pretty noticeable if you understand the MU enough and I think even hes aware, he just doesnt have the experience.
IIRC, here are some of ESAM's win-records against OoR MKsHowever he gets by on his outstanding skill as a player and pika having a natural tendency to do well vs MK even if you arent an expert in the MU.
Probably not.Also the MU is even.
What does that have to do with ZSS? However, speaking with decent experience and understanding of mathematics and stats, tossing numbers with extremely low sample sizes and massive unstated assumptions is pointless and useless. Like the creditors who tried to claim the economy was fine in 2008 or peeps who tried to ban MK with an online poll. Unfortunately this isnt baseball.IIRC, here are some of ESAM's win-records against OoR MKs
1-5 vs. M2K (the win was in late 2011, and he's lost their past 3 sets).
2-3 vs. Tyrant (all but the most recent of these come from the MLG era).
1-2 vs. Anti (only managing the 1 win with ICs last summer).
1-2 vs. Zero (with their most recent encounter ending in a double 2-stock).
0-2 vs. Nairo (1-4 in Pika vs. MK games from SKTAR 1).
Note that the last 3 MKs listed here are actually less experienced in the MU than ESAM is. Pika's "natural tendency" on display?
While Im glad you feel confident in your assessment in pikas MU ratio vs MK. Maybe you can help me with a couple questions.Probably not.
Because I have a deep understanding of my character and how to fight MK. Because fighting one high/top level MK over and over in a region that's more or less banned MK during a significant growth in MKs meta-game will limit what you can learn about a MU and leave holes in your gameplay. And playing strong MKs a couple hours every 6 months is not sufficient to fill those gaps. Its not too hard to see that the regions that produce the strongest top level players at fighting MK also come from the same region with a strong MK presence (Japan, NY/NJ, SoCal).Err, I'm sorry, WHAT?!? He plays Seibrik on a regular basis and has squared off against the best MKs from all over (and outside) the country. If this doesn't count as sufficient exerience, I can't see how your sessions with Tyrant possibly could. Either that, or ESAM is a very slow learner (despite being amazing at every other aspect of the game).
The players I listed are all considered national-level threats and have achieved great success within their own regions. So there goes the skill confound that could potentially be raised if I were citing Z vs. Mew2King.What does that have to do with ZSS? However, speaking with decent experience and understanding of mathematics and stats, tossing numbers with extremely low sample sizes and massive unstated assumptions is pointless and useless. Like the creditors who tried to claim the economy was fine in 2008 or peeps who tried to ban MK with an online poll. Unfortunately this isnt baseball.
If you've got answers to these problems, by all means I'd love to hear them. Asking ME to explain why the matchup isn't actually that bad when I think it's 6:4 Metaknight is kind of silly. Unless there's only one possible way for someone with True Matchup Knowledge™ to answer these questions, and I'm somehow disqualifying myself by letting you do the talking. I will say that the first question is a bit...leading, though. Dair camping a character that threatens vertical space well is probably a bad idea (uair is fast and sets up for silly stuff). The MKs who I've seen do well normally try to wall Pika horizontally with fairs and tilts.While Im glad you feel confident in your assessment in pikas MU ratio vs MK. Maybe you can help me with a couple questions.
Many inexperienced pikas seem to believe dair camping is a difficult strategy for pika to handle. Can you explain to me why dair doesnt shut out pika, which move is best used to combat it, and why MK in the air against pika is a pretty bad sitution for him overall?
Many pikachus ESAM included have pretty bad habits when using QAC, particularly when going for QAC nair kills. Can you state what that habit is and how it relates to QA's weakness overall?
Meta Knight has a hard time approaching pikachu in comparison to characters such as Marth, Diddy, ROB, Wario, and others. Can you explain why and what common situation causes him to make approaching easier?
Unfortunately, I have no footage from these practice sessions - could I watch any of them in a stream archive somewhere? If not, I'd agree with the "no supporting evidence" bit, because in that case there's no objectively-accessible method of assessing the content of those sets. If people are reluctant to engage you, it's probably because they basically have to take your word for how these things go. At least with ESAM we actually have common footage that carefully documents how to lose to MK. EmbarrassNot sure if you noticed, but double check the players I practice with. I play with most of SoCals best players, and for almost all of them their best character is either MK or their second best is, on top of an abundance of high level MK's as well. I understand how this MU works. Can't force you to change your personal opinion on it, but I will force you to back it up with sufficient knowledge and reasoning if its to be taken seriously.
Because I have a deep understanding of my character and how to fight MK. Because fighting one high/top level MK over and over in a region that's more or less banned MK during a significant growth in MKs meta-game will limit what you can learn about a MU and leave holes in your gameplay. And playing strong MKs a couple hours every 6 months is not sufficient to fill those gaps. Its not too hard to see that the regions that produce the strongest top level players at fighting MK also come from the same region with a strong MK presence (Japan, NY/NJ, SoCal).
The numbers are pointless and while Im perfectly glad to no one ever wants to discuss specifics with pika, so instead we're stuck with lots of strong opinions on the matter and no supporting evidence.
So much this.Of course, I don't state these things because they should be obvious, and I think you're probably smart enough to see them without demanding people to spell them out. But as long as you can cite "massive unstated assumptions" without examples, you look smart without having to do any work. And the person you're arguing with has to waste time spelling it out or just give up out of boredom.
And this is exactly why people stopped arguing with ESAM and Tagxy when it came to Matchup discussions. Like trying to break a brick wall with your head.Of course, I don't state these things because they should be obvious, and I think you're probably smart enough to see them without demanding people to spell them out. But as long as you can cite "massive unstated assumptions" without examples, you look smart without having to do any work. And the person you're arguing with has to waste time spelling it out or just give up out of boredom.