- Joined
- Jun 28, 2013
- Messages
- 10,396
- Switch FC
- SW-0351-1523-9047
Uchihadark7
: I've got a lot of questions about this roster. (Sorry if this goes a bit long; I just wanted to be thorough, and find out the reasoning behind your choices) Chief among them:
-why cut Lucina but keep Dark Pit? They're in the exact same situation.
-why cut two completely unique Fire Emblem characters? Especially since you're giving one of their movesets to a character who only vaguely fights like them.
-why did you replace Toon Link with Young Link? They're practically the same character, but Toon Link stands out far more in terms of appearance.
-why would you cut several entire franchises? I get that Wii Fit Trainer's inclusion is controversial, but Olimar is from a popular franchise that works within the context of a fighting game, and most people don't have a problem with his inclusion.
-the Pokemon cuts. I get Pichu and Ivysaur (who isn't as noteworthy as the trainer's other two Pokemon, and I'm saying that as someone whose go-to gen 1 starter is Bulbasaur), but why cut Charizard for Squirtle, and why cut Lucario, who's been consistently popular and noteworthy for three generations now?
-Chunky Kong seems like a random choice, seeing as at the very least, there are two other Kongs more noteworthy than him (Dixie and Cranky), and cases for Tiny and Lanky could be made too.
-no new Metroid characters - seems weird that the series is still entirely represented by Samus
-why would Palutena need to be revamped when (by all indications) Dark Pit would be staying the same (that is to say, almost exactly identical to Pit)?
-you might have just forgot to mention this, but why isn't Ganondorf being revamped, especially when Blood Falcon (who would be a Falcon clone, in all likelihood) and Black Shadow are being added?
-why does Capcom get four characters when every other company only gets one, two tops? I get that it's if you were in charge of the roster, but some balance couldn't hurt.
-removing the ballot winner, Bayonetta, which seems like it would make all of that voting pretty much pointless.
-why cut Lucina but keep Dark Pit? They're in the exact same situation.
-why cut two completely unique Fire Emblem characters? Especially since you're giving one of their movesets to a character who only vaguely fights like them.
-why did you replace Toon Link with Young Link? They're practically the same character, but Toon Link stands out far more in terms of appearance.
-why would you cut several entire franchises? I get that Wii Fit Trainer's inclusion is controversial, but Olimar is from a popular franchise that works within the context of a fighting game, and most people don't have a problem with his inclusion.
-the Pokemon cuts. I get Pichu and Ivysaur (who isn't as noteworthy as the trainer's other two Pokemon, and I'm saying that as someone whose go-to gen 1 starter is Bulbasaur), but why cut Charizard for Squirtle, and why cut Lucario, who's been consistently popular and noteworthy for three generations now?
-Chunky Kong seems like a random choice, seeing as at the very least, there are two other Kongs more noteworthy than him (Dixie and Cranky), and cases for Tiny and Lanky could be made too.
-no new Metroid characters - seems weird that the series is still entirely represented by Samus
-why would Palutena need to be revamped when (by all indications) Dark Pit would be staying the same (that is to say, almost exactly identical to Pit)?
-you might have just forgot to mention this, but why isn't Ganondorf being revamped, especially when Blood Falcon (who would be a Falcon clone, in all likelihood) and Black Shadow are being added?
-why does Capcom get four characters when every other company only gets one, two tops? I get that it's if you were in charge of the roster, but some balance couldn't hurt.
-removing the ballot winner, Bayonetta, which seems like it would make all of that voting pretty much pointless.
Last edited: