thatoneguy1
Smash Journeyman
it seems like a lot of things from pm made it into ssb4. If the ssb4 team really took inspiration from pm who does the pmdt feel about that and the community as well?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Ganon's Side B was from Brawl and the latter two are pretty common sense. I think Sakurai and his team took design routes that they simply thought logical and fitting and that any correlation between Smash 4 and Project M is purely coincidence. Why would Sakurai take inspiration from a largely western developed fan mod anywayya but how is it that some moves do literally the same thing as pm? ganons side b? dk dash attack? alt costumes?
It's really just common sense, actually. DK's dash attack was always stupid. Diddy Kong has his DKC roll attack, so why not finally give DK his?ya but how is it that some moves do literally the same thing as pm? ganons side b? dk dash attack? alt costumes?
does this mean badgers are confirmed dlc for smash 4?Yes,
I bet they both took inspiration form the colour grey.
or badgers.
or something
No, I completely understand what youre getting at. But the Navi taunt? Its the same animation from Project M. Is that just a coincidence? And I would be more hard-pressed to believe your reasoning if both PM and Smash 4 were released at the same time. But that wasnt the case. C'mon, Nintendo had to have seen footage at least of PM and they were inspired and incorporated those aspects into the new game.I'm gonna say this again.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
You are falling into a logical fallacy.
(do yourself a favour and read up on it)
Youre seeing things in smash 4 that could have changed regardless and attributing them to PM because you saw PM first.
BOTH teams would have taken the DK roll from the DK games. It's pretty bloody simple to understand that...
That taunt was in brawl. PM replaced it with his melee taunt but decided to keep it in as a secret one.No, I completely understand what youre getting at. But the Navi taunt? Its the same animation from Project M. Is that just a coincidence? And I would be more hard-pressed to believe your reasoning if both PM and Smash 4 were released at the same time. But that wasnt the case. C'mon, Nintendo had to have seen footage at least of PM and they were inspired and incorporated those aspects into the new game.
If it's simple, then why did it take the devs until the fourth game to actually give him the roll? Not attributing that to PM inspiration though.BOTH teams would have taken the DK roll from the DK games. It's pretty bloody simple to understand that...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man - He said "if" they did. So he isn't attributing them to Project M, he is proposing the possibility. "If then" is a conditional used to entertain hypothetical scenarios. You are misrepresenting his argument to make it easier to attack.I'm gonna say this again.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
You are falling into a logical fallacy.
(do yourself a favour and read up on it)
Youre seeing things in smash 4 that could have changed regardless and attributing them to PM because you saw PM first.
BOTH teams would have taken the DK roll from the DK games. It's pretty bloody simple to understand that...
DK country returns is a thing.If it's simple, then why did it take the devs until the fourth game to actually give him the roll? Not attributing that to PM inspiration though.
I've always wondered why this would cause a legal issue? Is it because pm is not developed by nintendo?and because neither the PMDT or Sakurai will ever admit to influencing each other because of legal issues that could arise
this was exactly the point.One should conclude therefore, that this is a thread made to entertain the hypothetical scenario of smash 4 being influenced by PM.
A few things i'd like to address here. And i owe LydianAlchemist a reply too (missed it when this topic was active) ill add that and expand on this when i have time later.alright.. in the biggest attempt to keep an open mind here, it IS possible that there is some level of inspiration that smash 4 took from PM. things like DKs dash attack, i do find it hard to believe that theyd take 4 games to implement it if they though of it on their own.. a lot of things could simply be parallels between smart game designers, but i wouldnt doubt that nintendo would adopt some aspects of PM given that its become so big in the community the past year. I dont think id be wrong in saying that its not out of the realm of posibility that nintendo could have even contacted PM devs reminding them of copyright rules, AND/OR even offering some of them jobs. think about it, a big company that has access to a pool of home made game designers that are implementing ingenious idea into a game, AND its taking off in the community and becoming a hit? why wouldnt they take on an intern or two, or even some full time workers.
keep in mind, im not stating any facts here. but when you look at the big picture, PM is kinda the next big thing, EVEN with smash 4 coming into the picture. i doubt that sakurai hasnt noticed it, and i feel it would be in his best interest to mirror even smaller additions to the game that have become popular in the competitive community.
like i said man, im not stating any facts. but i think youre being a bit closed minded. im not trying to say that PM inspired smash 4, but Nintendo certainly knows about PM. I dont think you can really assume anything about the nature of nintendo, of what they would and wouldnt do, because you yourself do not work for them or really know anything about how they operate behind the scenes for that matter. and neither do I. im just saying thats its not out of the realm of possibility. As far as the interns go, youd be surprised how good working independently (and LEGALLY) on a game that proves you've studied nintendos coding architecture looks on a resume. ill say again, please do not be so closed minded as to automatically shut down everything people are saying. when you become a nintendo developper and find out otherwise, please contact me and say "I told you so."A few things i'd like to address here. And i owe LydianAlchemist a reply too (missed it when this topic was active) ill add that and expand on this when i have time later.
Just want to address these things first.
"things like DKs dash attack, i do find it hard to believe that theyd take 4 games to implement it if they though of it on their own."
This is silly, and imposing your own restrictions and thoughts into another companies reasons and planning process.
They could have had good reasons to leave DKs attack as it was. They might have just included it after the new gen of players had seen the new DKCR game. They may have intended to change it, but time restraints caused them to leave it as is.
"but i wouldnt doubt that nintendo would adopt some aspects of PM given that its become so big in the community the past year."
PM is 'big' in OUR community. Only ours (ours being smash). And even in our community there is a divide between PM players and Melee players. Let alone Brawl players, which is also a good chunk.
It is in NO way big compared to the people that own a smash game. (ie the smash customer base).
I dont think id be wrong in saying that its not out of the realm of posibility that nintendo could have even contacted PM devs reminding them of copyright rules, AND/OR even offering some of them jobs."
I highly doubt it. considering Nintendo haven't acknowledged the existence of PM.