SolidSonic
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2007
- Messages
- 652
One thing I have been noticing more and more on this board is, people stating how Snake "does not belong in Brawl".
This sentiment is expressed in many different ways:
~~ "Snake does not fit in with the crowd. He does not belong in Brawl. He does not make sense in Brawl. He is to different. He is to realistic. He does not work in Brawl. He was not meant for Brawl. There is no reason for him to be in Brawl." ~~
These statements confuse me. There might not have been an actual debate going on about Snake's worthiness, but there does seem to be two polarities on the subject. So I felt compelled to make this thread, in order to understand the two different camp's perspectives.
I'm of course a representative of the "snake fits in just fine, he is freaking awesome" camp. So I'll be analyzing the rationals of the anti-Snake camp, and the points they have come up with.
-True, snake himself is more realistic in comparison to this crowd. He is a detailed human model, with no magic-like powers. A modern man, who uses guns and stealth. How do these traits make him unworthy of being in Brawl though? In the games he performs numerous 'bullet dodging' like feats, in an over the top bad arse fashion. That one side of him is unrealistic.
What kind of foolish collectivist mentality drives one to think Snake being different is reason enough to exclude him from Brawl? Even if he does not fit in with the circus that is Smash Bros, you gotta remember he doesn't even fit in his own game world. Snake has like one real friend in his games, Otacon. He is a loner, he has no family, no love interest, no community whom he affiliates himself with. Just a man with his mission and purpose. It is only natural for him to 'not fit in with the Brawl roster', heck he does not even fit in his own game world, this loner persona would naturally carry over to Brawl.
Well I've now lost my train of thought so I'll end the post for now.
Thoughts?
This sentiment is expressed in many different ways:
~~ "Snake does not fit in with the crowd. He does not belong in Brawl. He does not make sense in Brawl. He is to different. He is to realistic. He does not work in Brawl. He was not meant for Brawl. There is no reason for him to be in Brawl." ~~
These statements confuse me. There might not have been an actual debate going on about Snake's worthiness, but there does seem to be two polarities on the subject. So I felt compelled to make this thread, in order to understand the two different camp's perspectives.
I'm of course a representative of the "snake fits in just fine, he is freaking awesome" camp. So I'll be analyzing the rationals of the anti-Snake camp, and the points they have come up with.
By what standard? If we were to look at Snakes fan base and fame world wide, and compare it to one of his competitor's (like Geno, Bomberman, Mega Man, Pack Man, etc), we would find his fan base / degree of fame either crushes said competitor or closely rivals the competitor. It is usually the case that people who downplay Snake in favor of another character, do so just because they are a big fanboy for said character. (e-gasp what a surprise) And of course, personal bias is not a proper measure when looking at a chars degree of worthiness. I shouldn't have to explain how highly acclaimed the MGS series is, and how popular the Snake character is -- so I won't.Argument 1: Snake is not worthy of being in Brawl, other third party characters should come before him.
Quite frankly, this is a laughable point to make. Yes he is very unique in comparison to the rest of the roster. So what? How on earth can more variety be a bad thing for a game like Brawl? If I'm not mistaken, Brawl is all about epic duels between the most iconic/popular video game characters, regardless of what said characters are like. Just look at the roster, we have a penguin with a hammer, an anime-like swordsmen, a chubby kid with telekinetic abilities, a plumber that shoots fireballs, a pair of Eskimos, and the rest of the circus.Argument 2: Snake does not fit in with the Brawl roster, he is just to different.
-True, snake himself is more realistic in comparison to this crowd. He is a detailed human model, with no magic-like powers. A modern man, who uses guns and stealth. How do these traits make him unworthy of being in Brawl though? In the games he performs numerous 'bullet dodging' like feats, in an over the top bad arse fashion. That one side of him is unrealistic.
What kind of foolish collectivist mentality drives one to think Snake being different is reason enough to exclude him from Brawl? Even if he does not fit in with the circus that is Smash Bros, you gotta remember he doesn't even fit in his own game world. Snake has like one real friend in his games, Otacon. He is a loner, he has no family, no love interest, no community whom he affiliates himself with. Just a man with his mission and purpose. It is only natural for him to 'not fit in with the Brawl roster', heck he does not even fit in his own game world, this loner persona would naturally carry over to Brawl.
Well I've now lost my train of thought so I'll end the post for now.
Thoughts?