Alright, lets go back to the post where this all started, so we can settle this, and shut up about it, as I am getting sick of addressing it. The post I first replied to was this:
Sakurai makes the final decision. He's not going to pick a character just because they're popular. Otherwise we'd have Goku in Smash. You obviously have no good arguments if all you will say is "argument over."
In the first half of my comment, I wanted to address the fact that Goku didn't originate in Video Games. One of the few apparent rules of the ballot, is that the character has to be a video game character. (Hence how the term "Video Game Character" and "Favorite Video Game Character" were thrown around several times throughout the ballot page. Add the fact that it asks for the
video game they originated from, and it's even more obvious.)
Thus, at the very beginning of the reply, I say this "Actually we wouldn't have Goku from the ballot either way to be honest. Whether he got one vote, or a million... he
didn't originate in video games."
The reply he gave, "Master Chief would've been a better example. I'm sure tons of idiots are voting for him along with Goku. And no, Sakurai is...-" was contradictory to what I was saying. Notice how he words this. Not only does this try to switch in a character that doesn't fit the point (Goku originated in Manga/Anime, Master Chief originated in Video games), He even lumps the character
with Goku. Look... I understand people consider Master Chief a troll character. I get this. However, I was specifically replying to his mentioning of Goku. Master Chief did not ONCE cross my mind, and would not have crossed my mind, as it would completely delete the purpose of what I was stating about Goku.
For that matter.. why would Master Chief be a better example at this point? I was specifically replying to the bit where he mentioned Goku. I was addressing Goku. Master Chief was not mentioned at any point during that first comment I had replied too, it was Goku that he had brought up. So, it was Goku that I addressed.. fairly simple.
Thus, I replied, trying to remedy the error, in a polite manner, "No. Master Chief wouldn't have been a better example >_>...
Though he is just as ridiculous as the others, he DID originate in video games. (Halo to be exact) So no. Goku is the primary example here. Some other examples that would apply here would be Shrek, Mickey Mouse, Naruto,... Basically anyone from media that is not gaming. (Anime, Manga, Cartoons, etc.) I find that funny to be honest. The ballot throughout the page heavily emphasizes the word
Video game character, yet idiots still don't realize the characters they are voting for, whether serious or troll, are out of bounds."
The point is, Goku applied to the point I was trying to make. Master Chief did not. Of course, he didn't catch what I was saying apparently, as he then replied
"Yes, Master Chief is the best example. Just because the ballot vaguely says "any videogame character" does not mean every video game character has a chance (unless you count 0.0000000001% as a chance). Master Chief would be a very, very stupid addition. In the end, this is Sakurai's game. Yes, he wants to please the fans, but he's not going to ruin his game with stupid characters to please us. No matter how much we want Ridley, Sakurai believes it's not good for the game, and so it's not happening."
He misread. What I said. Plain and simple. How he misread it:
Apparently, he thought I was advocating for Master Chief for some reason, as he thought the any videogame character meant I was giving some sort of justification for him.. Let me bold it, so you can see what I mean:
"Yes, Master Chief is the best example. Just because the ballot vaguely says "any videogame character" does not mean every video game character has a chance (unless you count 0.0000000001% as a chance). Master Chief would be a very, very stupid addition."
Again, that was not the point I was trying to make. Goku, is the primary example, because,.... and I am only going to say this, one more time, so everyone that still doesn't understand it (I'm sure most of you here do, but apparently some don't), will get it through to their brain...:
Goku IS the primary example of my comment, because he ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF GAMING. Other characters that apply to this, (I'll list more just to make it more obvious.. ( obviously not all of these are campaigned, as they are obscure troll entries, but..)) are Shrek, Mickey Mouse, Naruto, Dora the Explorer, Spongebob, Timmy Turner, Thomas the Tank.... do I need to list any more, or do you get it now?
Master Chief, can't be lumped with this group, despite being somewhat of a troll character himself, because he originated in
VIDEO GAMES.
There, I'm done. I am not addressing that any further. If Serrell doesn't understand at this point, I am not stressing it any further, I am just simply ignoring him.
Listen, I support Shantae, but I'm starting to agree that speculation / pushing for a character brings out the most ridiculous logic or desperation from fanbois. Please take a step back instead of always interpreting things in a way that gives you a perceived upper hand in argument. Unless I'm the one that's completely off.
What the heck are you even talking about?... I've already stressed why Master Chief did not, could not, and will not apply to that comment, so I won't stretch that any further...