Support for Ridley in Brawl

[Yoshi330]

No, not a boss or an assist trophey, but a PLAYABLE CHARACTER. Who else thinks that Ridley should make it as a Smash Bros fighter? Who else wants to PLAY as him?

Post now!

PS: if there is already a topic for this that is not dead. please give me a link.

 

[Pieman0920]

There was a topic, but that was closed.

There would be another topic about him but that's against the rules now. People will get banned for making a topic about him now.

Though in retrospect there should be a notice for new users like yourself. =/

 

[Yoshi330]

Huh?

Why would it be agienst the rules?

 

[Meta_Sonic64]

Welcome to Smashboards. The Ridley threads were out of control thus causing its supporters to be banned and for Ridley threads to be against the rules

 

[Mr.Victory07]

edit:^^^i didnt know that^^^, what did they do to get banned?Riot, spam?
isnt there an official Ridley for brawl thread?

 

[Meta_Sonic64]

isnt there an official Ridley for brawl thread?

Yes, but it's locked

 

[tirkaro]

http://smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=126609
^the first post explains it

 

[DekuBoy]

Let him off, he didn't know.

 

[platnum]

hhmmmmm maybe...one day...

 

[Yoshi330]

I understand and accept.

Although would Ridley support be okay on my sig?

 

[platnum]

yes it would.

 

[gigasteve]

Let's get on to the part where we support Ridley.

 

[Punchline]

Prepare to be banned by the whoaringness of Gimpy.
5...
4...
3...
2...
1...

 

[Darkpaladin of Chaos]

It's not like Ridley needs a support thread anyway. Based on the poll, he has the highest chance of making it out of any unconfirmed newcomer.

 

[Punchline]

So thats safe to say Geno and Claus doesnt need a support thread either?

 

[NukeA6]

I understand and accept.

Although would Ridley support be okay on my sig?

Try the sig I have if you wish.

 

[Kirby King]

Alright, so the first guy who posted in this thread didn't know we tried Ridley threads already. The next guy explained this to him. All that's fine. What's everyone else's excuse?