• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

SP's Conspiracy Theoracy....crushed?

Status
Not open for further replies.

gunterrsmash01

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
2,533
In all respect to SamuraiPanda, I think his theory might not as good as you think.

Let's take a look on what Sakurai has said about the demo.

" And it appears that this event will display the first ever public playable version of Super Smash Bros. Brawl! I am planning on having people play the game—but with limited character selection. "

Limited character selection. That obviously means less then normal, and only showcasing the ones they CAN showcase. Zelda? No, because Shiek could be in. Kirby? They got lazy with making the hats for the demo(or whatever else). You get the point.

Another quote.

" The problem is Sonic. What to do... I suppose if we’re going to all this trouble, perhaps we should make him playable. "

What do you mean "make him playable", Sakurai? Oh wait, doesn't that mean your not SUPPOSED to be playing Sonic, since he is unlockable secret? Guess what, thanks to his announcement being inches away from the delay, it only makes sense to let us try him out. Sakurai won't torture us like that. Basically, Sonic is unlockable but was playable in the demo because of all the hype built up days before, when he was Announced.

Bottom line. The demo showcased the characters Nintendo handpicked. Its not the starting, its a LIMITED roster. Which makes sense for a demo.


PS: I don't know how to quote..... -.-
 

bballstar23

Smash Ace
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
914
Location
Chicago
Switch FC
SW-2383-6686-1312
I'm sorry, but this isn't anything new. Tons of people have mentioned this in the multiple pages of Samurai Panda's thread. You didn't need to make a new one.
 

Boofer

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
755
I agree, but these points were brought up in his actual thread.
 

EDreams

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
330
Yet nobody seems to be getting the message. It's a ridiculous theory regardless.
 

gunterrsmash01

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
2,533
I'm sorry, but this isn't anything new. Tons of people have mentioned this in the multiple pages of Samurai Panda's thread. You didn't need to make a new one.
If thats true, then I am terribly sorry, sir.

But, this way people will notice, right?

Eh, whatever I put a lot of detail into it.

Yet nobody seems to be getting the message. It's a ridiculous theory regardless.

Mine? Or sp's?
 

EDreams

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
330
Mine? Or sp's?
Panda's. The thing I found the most ridiculous about it was that I hadn't noticed a lot of people actually supporting the "OMG starting roster!!" theory until he posted the exact same thing the few supporters were.

Then everyone immediately starts agreeing.
 

gigasteve

Smash Ace
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
730
Totally agree. Check out my thread below for more proving SP wrong.
And also, I tried something like this: it was closed.
 

gunterrsmash01

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
2,533
Ok so this is gonna get closed.

Props to SP for making such a head scratching theory!

He gets SIX mars bars if he turns out correct.
 

Lemon Drop

Smash Lord
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
1,286
Location
KY, USA
My opinions are the same as ozz3000.

Why make an update about the demo and say "Limited roster" then turn around and say "This is the final starting roster?"
 

Youko

Podcasting Pro
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
5,000
Location
Lake Orion, MI
NNID
SMYNYouko
3DS FC
1418-6781-7411
Why don't you guys understand that the theory wasn't meant to be taken as absolute fact but as something that could possibly come true that we should be open to. Honestly...

And there was zero need to make a separate thread for this, might I add...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom