Those qualifications don't make a certain character have a guaranteed "chance" at making it in. If I were to argue Jon Dowd had a chance at making it, I'd be completely offbase. (Long story short, Barry Bonds is not really part of the players union, therefore in mlb games he is replaced by a fictional character with the same characteristics. In MVP Baseball 2005, Bonds is replaced by Dowd). Sure, Dowd originated in video games, he's an entirely fictional character whose first appearance was in a video game. Sure, he appeared on a nintendo console, so long as the gamecube counts. Does he have any chance at all? No!
Based on those characteristics, I see no reason for him to not be considered. I wouldn't WANT him in the game, but it doesn't mean he doesn't have any chance at all since he fits the criteria. Unless you can find me a quote where Sakurai specifically says he
wouldn't put in a fictional baseball player (he added a racer by the name of Captain Falcon if you recall. Not
that large of a stretch).
He's a minor character from an entirely detached producer.
Fortunately, Sora has no such problem.
See above.
He represents a real life baseball star.
See above.
He has NO CHANCE. There is a zero likelihood that Dowd makes it into the game. Sakurai will not put him in.
I certainly hope not. Sounds like a bad choice to me.
Sora may not be as extreme of an example as Jon Dowd, but Dowd proves that the criteria you present don't necessarily grant a character a chance. Those criteria, it seems, rather prove as ways to -dispute- characters, rather than give them a chance. If someone doesn't meet the requirements, they definitely aren't in. If they do meet the requirements, they still could have no chance like Dowd.
I disagree. You didn't actually prove that Dowd
can't be in. You just explained why his chance is small and why he wouldn't really be a good addition.
There's no difference between 9.99999~ and 1, so why is there a difference between an infinitely small .00000000`1 and 0? Unless, of course, you think Sora's chance is higher than .0000~1
I would have to say they actually are higher than that. He may not be iconic, but it's not like Kingdom Hearts is some unknown game. It was very well received and is quickly blossoming into a full-fledged franchise on it's own. I would say the main character of the franchise stands a mediocre chance. It's not like I think he's
likely, but still. I don't think most people give Sora enough credit.
Better, in the way he used it, means a more likely, more suitable, and more popular character from a more iconic series.
But how would I know that? In fact, how would
you know that? "Better" is broad, like I said. I like Sora more, therefor I consider him better. That's my point. Saying there are "better choices" is too vague to be entirely accurate. Saying there are "more iconic characters" or something of the like is more specific.
Megaman has many games on nintendo systems and started with the nes. He has original, weapon based gameplay. Capcom and Nintendo are close. Megaman is a large series. Megaman is wellknown by many people of many age groups.
Bomberman, again, is well represented on nintendo systems. He too has original, bomb based gameplay. Bomberman is a very big series with over 60 games.
Which makes them more likely candidates for Brawl. Yes. Not the point. My sole reason for posting was to prove that Sora has
a chance no matter how minuscule some may think it is.
Geno is effectively a MARIO character from a different company. He's a nintendo exclusive character. Nintendo's gotten him to cameo before. He's a very different character. He was a main star of a very popular game. He's extremely popular in both Japan and the U.S.
"Very popular"? He seems to have a cult following at best.
He's -another- sword fighter.
Technically, he's a
key fighter. Besides, we may have lots of sword fightes, but they all play differently so why does it matter?
His company, Square, would more likely put Geno in (who has already cameo'd in a nintendo game) than Sora.
What are your reasons for saying that? What about Geno making being a "Mario character" makes it more likely for Square to pick him? It's not like Geno would be good for advertising. If I were Square, and I had the chance to add whatever character to Brawl I wanted, I'd pick a character that would get people to buy my latest games (though, admittedly, that's still probably not Sora).
I'm just curious what criteria you use to describe "better"? Favorite? If it means "better choice to enter a nintendo character fightfest", why Sora?
Favorite. You nailed it. Doesn't make him more likely or relevant, but it makes me root for him more.
Something we actually agree on. Neat-o.
Sonic's a great character because he -was- the icon of the early nineties. Sonic's a great character because sonic 3 and knuckles is often regarded as the best game -ever made-. Sonic's a great character because he has had decades of amazing games. He's a great character because he put a face to Sega. He's a great character for Brawl because he's been "fighting" mario his entire life and has been all over nintendo consoles.
Sora's done none of those.
But do you think Sonic would've held on this long without his personality? Yeah, he was fine back in the 2D days because his games were good. But that's changed. Sonic's been given the benefit of the doubt several times since moving to 3D and has come up short. Do all of Sonic's current fans just love bad gameplay? Or do they continue to support because they love Sonic himself? I know why
Isupport him (the latter).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Frown :( :("
mickey.
mouse.
Ick.
Sonic Rush, Sonic Riders, Sonic Rush Adventure, Sonic and the Secret Rings say hi.
Did you not see the "arguably"? You may like those games, but the general mood toward all of Sonic's latest titles that I've seen is:
. . . And you liked Sonic Riders? o_O
Hey I like pumpkin pie as well. But I also like other pies.
Oh. Well then, we're good.