Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
you're right he should'nt have been added or anyone from fire emblem since fire emblem sux .I meen he is going to be a link clone practacally. honestly i dont think they shouldve added him into SSBB......
sword != link cloneI meen he is going to be a link clone practacally. honestly i dont think they shouldve added him into SSBB......
Ah, but in the actual games it comes from, Ragnell is not a two-handed sword, but a typical one-handed one. In fact, in Radiant Dawn it is revealed (no, this is not a spoiler of any importance, just an insignificant detail that gets shown at one point) that its original owner wielded both Ragnell and its counterpart blade Alondite (which is used by the Black Knight during PoR/RD) in a dual-wielding style, which would be impossible if either was a two-handed blade, much less both (and the two are identical in every way, so if one was two-handed, both would be). Ragnell was altered in Brawl to fit Ike's SSB fighting style.Hello? He's wielding a 2-handed sword with ONE hand.
Actually, just because two people use swords doesn't make them exactly the same.sword != link clone
His movement range is the same as all other foot soldiers - 6 unpromoted, 7 promoted. The only characters faster than that are mounted ones, and the only slower are heavily armored knights and magic-users. Well, and then theres the Laguz, but they're another race entirely anyway.Well, in Path of Radiance Ike had fairly poor moment range so that might explain it.
biased n00b.you're right he should'nt have been added or anyone from fire emblem since fire emblem sux .
I don't know anything about the Ragnell. I haven't encountered it in PoR, yet, so I'm just hypothesizing here. Do they ever state outright whether the Ragnell is a two handed sword? If it is possible for Ike to wield a two handed sword with one hand because of his exaggerated strength, then is it possible that the original wielder actually dual wields a two handed sword with the same sort of exaggerated strength?that its original owner wielded both Ragnell and its counterpart blade Alondite (which is used by the Black Knight during PoR/RD) in a dual-wielding style, which would be impossible if either was a two-handed blade, much less both (and the two are identical in every way, so if one was two-handed, both would be). Ragnell was altered in Brawl to fit Ike's SSB fighting style.
The thing is, his fighting style is not supposed to be so. It was taught to him by his father, and his swordsmanship was said to be the best there ever was - far from inelegant at all, it was the most astounding display those who witnessed it ever saw. Granted, Ike's swordsmanship is less refined than his father's was, at least during PoR, but its not like he was taught an all-power no-finesse style of fighting.It's supposed to represent his personality, Ike is a rugged mercenary, who is strong and inelegant. He is basically the opposite of Marth and this is reflected in his fighting style.
No, it is never outright stated whether it is two-handed or not; however, the images and animation of the blades do not make them look any larger than the typical one-handed blades of the game (and there is one sword, King Ashnard's Gurgurant, which is plainly a two-handed blade from its images and animation), plus what is seen/known of the previous wielder does not give any indication of the individual having anywhere near that kind of exaggerated strength (minor spoiler:burrito said:I don't know anything about the Ragnell. I haven't encountered it in PoR, yet, so I'm just hypothesizing here. Do they ever state outright whether the Ragnell is a two handed sword? If it is possible for Ike to wield a two handed sword with one hand because of his exaggerated strength, then is it possible that the original wielder actually dual wields a two handed sword with the same sort of exaggerated strength?
Well, thats one theory. Personally, I don't really buy it, but its possible.@Zevox: Well, what I meant was that it was supposed to represent his personality, not his actual in-game fighting style. I figure that his brawl fighting style was created purely to represent Ike sort of symbolically rather than physically. That must have been why the sword was designed as a two handed weapon as well
I'm afraid thats not so either. Though his speed growth rate is somewhat lower in Radiant Dawn than Path of Radiance, his speed as a Hero caps higher than his strength (27 strength max and 30 speed max) and as a Vanguard it has the same cap as his strength (37 each), and he has no trouble capping both in either class. Hes certainly portrayed as much more powerful in RD, but slow-but-strong doesn't fit there at all either.Coselm said:His slow-and-strong-ness is based off of FE10, even though his costume is circa FE9. I've read that somewhere...
i agree, he should be a little fasterIke should be made a little faster, but not fast... power needs to be balanced with speed.
why not? they have all the zelda characters from the same game. and besides Ike could be the PoR representative, and Sothe could be the RD representative. Although I would like to see Sigurd, moreso than the return of Marth.Why have two people from the same FE universe? Put someone in from FE4 or 5. Granted, I don't know who's popular, so I guess just put Sigurd. Or maybe he might long shot Ephraim, but I don't think that game is too popular.
Yeah, but all the Zelda characters are always more or less the same regardless of game. The only real differ in age. I think it would be better to represent the whole FE franchise rather than the most recent games... and the first lord.why not? they have all the zelda characters from the same game. and besides Ike could be the PoR representative, and Sothe could be the RD representative. Although I would like to see Sigurd, moreso than the return of Marth.
Correction: they have all the Zelda designs from the same game. The characters themselves come from nearly every Zelda game out there - certainly there has never been a Zelda game without Link, and there have only been one or two without Zelda (she did have a cameo in Majora's Mask, so I think the only one she was truly absent from was Link's Awakening). Fire Emblem doesn't have characters who are omnipresent like that, which is why drawing all of its characters from any one game would be foolish.they have all the zelda characters from the same game.
Thank you. Stated much better than I ever could.Correction: they have all the Zelda designs from the same game. The characters themselves come from nearly every Zelda game out there - certainly there has never been a Zelda game without Link, and there have only been one or two without Zelda (she did have a cameo in Majora's Mask, so I think the only one she was truly absent from was Link's Awakening). Fire Emblem doesn't have characters who are omnipresent like that, which is why drawing all of its characters from any one game would be foolish.
Zevox
I see what your saying, but I would argue, by putting Sothe in it would be characters from 2 games not just one. In PoR Sothe was a worthless peice of crap that pretty much no one even noticed until they found out he was a lord for RD. In RD he is an awsome Lord with significant importance, not to mention a unique style that could be brought to Brawl (knives/daggers anyone?)Correction: they have all the Zelda designs from the same game. The characters themselves come from nearly every Zelda game out there - certainly there has never been a Zelda game without Link, and there have only been one or two without Zelda (she did have a cameo in Majora's Mask, so I think the only one she was truly absent from was Link's Awakening). Fire Emblem doesn't have characters who are omnipresent like that, which is why drawing all of its characters from any one game would be foolish.
Zevox
thats how zelda works... it's all TP stuff now, you don't see majora's mask link, or Oot link.I think it would be better to represent the whole FE franchise rather than the most recent games...
Sothe was not a Lord in RD - hes nowhere near as important to the story as a Lord, and after the early chapters he can die without it being a game over. If anything, he was a Jeigan (early game pre-promote, main task is to protect the Lord, doesn't turn out too good in the end - all hes missing is being a Paladin, and the fact that he turns out better than previous Jeigans). The Lords of RD were Micaiah, Ike, and Elincia, with Sanaki and Tibarn being arguable.I see what your saying, but I would argue, by putting Sothe in it would be characters from 2 games not just one. In PoR Sothe was a worthless peice of crap that pretty much no one even noticed until they found out he was a lord for RD. In RD he is an awsome Lord with significant importance, not to mention a unique style that could be brought to Brawl (knives/daggers anyone?)
I really think it is the only theory as to why Ike is so slow. There has to be a reason why. You don't think Sakurai just made Ike slow to annoy Fire Emblem fans, did you?Well, thats one theory. Personally, I don't really buy it, but its possible.
No, I don't - like I said, my theory is that he was made slow to differentiate him from Marth, since had he gone as his portrayal in Fire Emblem itself implies he should have, he would statistically be very similar to him; only a little stronger and heavier. I think that makes more sense than that it was a reflection of his personality, since I really don't think it is suited to his personality personally. In any event, both are valid theories, and only the developers know ultimately.I really think it is the only theory as to why Ike is so slow. There has to be a reason why. You don't think Sakurai just made Ike slow to annoy Fire Emblem fans, did you?
Well, I really think it's actually both. By making Ike a slow character, he was both successfully making Ike different from Marth and reflecting his personality. Really, if Sakurai just wanted to make Ike different from Marth, there were tons of ways to do that. So, Ike was differentiated from Marth in a way that would reflect his personality. It works the inverse way, too. Having Ike have a similar fighting style to Marth would be weird when they have such different personalities. So, Ike's personality was reflected by differentiating him from Marth.No, I don't - like I said, my theory is that he was made slow to differentiate him from Marth, since had he gone as his portrayal in Fire Emblem itself implies he should have, he would statistically be very similar to him; only a little stronger and heavier. I think that makes more sense than that it was a reflection of his personality, since I really don't think it is suited to his personality personally. In any event, both are valid theories, and only the developers know ultimately.
he may not be a commander, but he is the commanders right hand man, which makes him very important. Also the fact that he is promoted automatically as part of the story makes him more important than others, after all only Lords promote automatically besides him so far. I dunno about the dieing thing, I never let him die, but he is very important to the story so i don't see how he could officially "die" and not still be in it.Sothe was not a Lord in RD - hes nowhere near as important to the story as a Lord
And what makes him more important than any other "right hand men" of FE games? Jeigan? Marcus? Soren? Near as I can tell, nothing.he may not be a commander, but he is the commanders right hand man, which makes him very important.
It doesn't make him more important, it just means he got special treatment in that regard.Windlord said:Also the fact that he is promoted automatically as part of the story makes him more important than others, after all only Lords promote automatically besides him so far.
Hes not important to the story at all, though. Past the scene whereWindlord said:I dunno about the dieing thing, I never let him die, but he is very important to the story so i don't see how he could officially "die" and not still be in it.
True, but then again, Radiant Dawn gives a lot more spotlight to a lot of the characters than previous FE games. What other game gave common soldiers as much of a role as Soren, Nephenee, Geoffrey, or Bastian had in Radiant Dawn, to name a few? Hell, I'd argue most of them have a greater role in the game than Sothe, to be honest.Windlord said:No other Jeigan has had anywhere near as much attention as him.
I see Soren, Titania, Mist, Reyson, and Leanne all on the cover of Path of Radiance. Does that make them important to it's story? Reyson and Leanne are to a limited degree (though like Sothe, nowhere near Lord status), true, but the others certainly are not. being on the cover does not make a character important.Windlord said:technically you may be right that he's not an "official" lord because he's always with micaiah who gives the orders, but he's on the cover and I don't see Elincia, Ike, or Sanaki on there,
No, its perfectly accurate. Compared to Ike, Micaiah, and Elincia (and Sanaki and Tibarn, if you count them), hes a negligible influence on the story. If it weren't for Micaiah, most of part 1 would never happen. If it weren't for Micaiah and Sanaki, the game would have ended at the end of part 3, withWindlord said:so to say "hes nowhere near as important to the story as a Lord" is a bit of a stretch I think.
I absolutely disagree. For Brawl, Ike > Micaiah, and no one else has a shot (and Micaiah is a long shot herself). For importance to RD, Micaiah > Ike > Sephiran > Tibarn > Sanaki = Elincia > I could go on, but Sothe won't be appearing any time soon even if I do.Windlord said:The point of this post is Sothe>Micaiah>the rest of the RD cast (besides Ike)
If it weren't for Sothe Micaiah would've been captured/killed in the first video. AlsoNo, its perfectly accurate. Compared to Ike, Micaiah, and Elincia (and Sanaki and Tibarn, if you count them), hes a negligible influence on the story. If it weren't for Micaiah, most of part 1 would never happen. If it weren't for Micaiah and Sanaki, the game would have ended at the end of part 3, with Ashera awakened by Lehran's Medallion to destroy the world outright. If it weren't for Elincia and Tibarn, the game's wars would have gone very differently. And I really shouldn't have to explain Ike. Sothe does nothing of importance even close to them - he just acts over-protective towards Micaiah. Hell, even the Black Knight is more important than him, and hes just a flunky for the main villains.
I agree with Ike>all (thats why I said "besides Ike")I absolutely disagree. For Brawl, Ike > Micaiah, and no one else has a shot (and Micaiah is a long shot herself). For importance to RD, Micaiah > Ike > Sephiran > Tibarn > Sanaki = Elincia > I could go on, but Sothe won't be appearing any time soon even if I do.
I hate to be a literalist jerk, but he already has "appeared"I could go on, but Sothe won't be appearing any time soon even if I do.