D
Deleted member
Guest
Removed by Moderator
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Stopped reading here.Top:
Ness
that does not make sense, tier list should take character potential and not the player's level into account.I just wanna point out again though that this isn't for playing people who are at your level. It's presuming that the 1v2 match is relatively even, meaning the 2 players are likely much worse than the 1 player.
that is not for the tier list though, tier list should be objective who is the best char for 2v1, and not player dependant.Well if you're 1 vs. 2 against people who are at the same level as you, chances are you're gonna get your *** kicked pretty hard, and only take off 2-3 stocks. That would be most accurate I guess, but it would be pretty meaningless.
It's not looking at level, it's just looking at level relative to opponents.
This looks right to me.TOP:
Kirby
Pikachu
HIGH:
Mario
Fox
MID:
Samus
Falcon
Luigi
LOW:
Jiggly
DK
Yoshi
BOTTOM:
Link
Ness
Not to get off topic, but kirby is a dude. As shown here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1M7kJASyoQYeah, kirby being able to recover some of the time does make her seem better.
samus's only game is defenseKirby
Pikachu
Mario
Samus
Top 4 1v2 characters bar none. Samus is surprisingly good against 2 if you're playing a defensive game.
You are taking direct bias intoy our fact that Ness is good in 1v2's.Changed the OP list to thegreginator's, but I moved Ness up (for reasons explained in OP).