The Stoopid Unikorn
Spiciest of Guacamoles
Whether is a Sacrificial Reviver or a Universal Backup doesn’t matter, because either way, it doesn’t extend the game while still keeping the possibility of bringing back a powerful role.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I still really want to see a whole mafia of doublevoters*cough*vig*cough*doublevoter*
OH DEAR GOD!I still really want to see a whole mafia of doublevoters
If the revivers are one-shot, that prevents a permanent stalemate and I don't see anything wrong with them, then.I guess that’s a good point.
But unless the reviver has a backup ability, they essentially become vanilla after the revive. And being vanilla in a role madness sucks. Just ask Joja.
I never said revivers should be multi-shots.If the revivers are one-shot, that prevents a permanent stalemate and I don't see anything wrong with them, then.
If someone picks a role that's not fun for them, it's their own damn fault, lol.I never said revivers should be multi-shots.
I’m just saying that if it’s the ONLY thing they can do, in a game all about role insanity, it’s not gonna be very fun for them.
Reviving being one-shot is something I couldn’t agree more on.
If town has 6 revivers, that's 6 people unable to do anything else.Also a good point.
Though we should at least establish a rule where only one reviver can be in the game, even if we agree on multiple people having the exact same role for chaos’ sake.
But there's only 2 mafia mayors from past games.I still really want to see a whole mafia of doublevoters
I'm getting there!!!>no Fate 1
I see how it is
I think you need the mod of this section to do that, and I can't tell you who that is because the "update" killed the listings of who mods what (though I'm guessing BarDull?).You can't edit the poll question?
Shhhhhh you gotta keep your role a secret!!also if we're taking sign-ups for this I'll have Phoenix Wright, before anyone else can take him. Nick is all mine
Or maybe that's just what I want people to think. An Ace Attorney fan like me is obviously going to go for Phoenix Wright, right? I wonder... The game might not have started yet, but the mindgames can begin any time. :pShhhhhh you gotta keep your role a secret!!
daaaaaangOr maybe that's just what I want people to think. An Ace Attorney fan like me is obviously going to go for Phoenix Wright, right? I wonder... The game might not have started yet, but the mindgames can begin any time.
Excuse me?were ****ing pokemon this **** lol
Oh! I thought you sere making a joke about my Pokemafia. lolgen 1 pokemon had 151 pokemon
theres 151 roles
get it?
nah jsut the number -3-Oh! I thought you sere making a joke about my Pokemafia. lol
Imo, you scrap all unique win conditions and make all the roles have the same generic "defeat the mafia" or "defeat the town" win condition.Honestly my biggest question pertains to roles like Seviper and Zangoose. If one gets picked and the other doesn't, does the one who did get picked auto-win since they technically outlasted the other?
Free powers cause you already know the answer to two of three riddles, lol.You know, one other question I had is...how would The Riddler work? Would new riddles be made, or would it just be a useless role with just the old, no-longer-relevant riddles?
isn't it obvious to just make new riddles based off the structure of the game the host gets?You know, one other question I had is...how would The Riddler work? Would new riddles be made, or would it just be a useless role with just the old, no-longer-relevant riddles?
If their goal is to keep the roles exactly the same then no, it's not obvious.isn't it obvious to just make new riddles based off the structure of the game the host gets?
considering we made talks about changing revivers, getting rid of specific win cons, and to making two characters who are in similar boats not to have one clear advantage of the other, pretty sure that already went out the windowIf their goal is to keep the roles exactly the same then no, it's not obvious.
We also made talks about not doing that.considering we made talks about changing revivers, getting rid of specific win cons, and to making two characters who are in similar boats not to have one clear advantage of the other, pretty sure that already went out the window
oh....missed those :VWe also made talks about not doing that.
How typical :Voh....missed those :V