Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Gah!Never seen yourself from that angle? Well, if that is somehow true, I'm pretty sure your brain would fill in the gaps pretty well.
You've kind of lost me here, not sure what you're going on about. XD Things are only true if there is some sort of scientific basis for them, and that also means it is logical (reality isn't illogical i.e. that's where we get our logic from) so metaphysically speaking things in reality can be explained. I'm all for appreciating experiences and understanding what that means, but if your experience has a scientific understanding and/or makes no logical sense, then it is safe to say that it doesn't happen precisely as you think it did. Even in circumstances involving probabilities, if something wondrous seems more likely than just something random, that still isn't grounds to accept that is truth if it defies scientific understanding and logic, after all, every so often unlikely/rare things occur.
I'm going to refer to Through the Wormhole again, they went over a study where it tested the human's ability to give meaning to randomness, and when they felt emotionally affected, they felt all the more certain that they were seeing symbols and signs in pictures of random pixels. In a sense this is kind of similar to people accrediting some meaning to experiences. That, and like I said, people like to instill value in the impressions their mind takes, particularly when it seems spectacular.
Everything that science has disproved were things set up basically by religious dogma, things made with no basis at all or from "experiences" (i.e. the world seems flat, amiright?) Science isn't about disproving anything, it's just that there were a lot of things to disprove that was believed.
Now, I'm not going to say that astral projection just cannot be in anyway proven, but there is not only a lack of necessity for it, but it also involves tearing down a lot of our understanding that has seemed to make sense thus far.
Again, don't mean to be a downer or whatever, you may think as you wish, I have no problem with that. I myself in the past was interested in astral projection and similar "spirit science" things, mayhaps it is the reason why I feel compelled to attack it now because I dropped it not long after.