itsameSMB
Smash Journeyman
(FTR, this is my first debate thread I started here, so please keep that in mind while reading this)
Well, that's what I think at least. Now, let's hear from you!
NOTE: I do not condone the acts mentioned above, I was just using them as examples for the discussion.
The introduction
Evil. It's a term used to describe something/someone that/who is malevolent, cruel, or just a big [censor]. We all oppose it, and yet evil still exists. Why is that? It's not as if someone intentionally set out to be evil. Sure, some folks might try to be annoying or merciless in a competative or domestic sense, but no one that I could imagine would do something considered evil just for the sake of evil. Why then are some people considered evil? What makes a group/person evil?My opinion on it
I don't think that there is such a thing as absolute evil as evil is a relative term. Granted it means generally the same thing to everyone, but as I have said, nobody outside of works of fiction sets out just to cause meaningless harm. Hitler was as far from a saint as you coud be, but in his mind he was trying to help the human race to accelerate human evolution (not saying the killing of many isn't evil, but his intentions, no matter how twisted they may be, weren't in his mind). Those who exploit others for personal gain aren't evil, either. Doesn't mean they are good, but rather they are just self-centered. Even terrorists in an absolute sense aren't evil, just misguided and tricked into believing that their cause is righteous and that the end justifies the means. They are only evil in a relative sense, like to the people they terrorize. I think there are only evil actions, not evil people. After all, no one will see the error in their own ways (I forgot where that's from so I may have paraphased).Well, that's what I think at least. Now, let's hear from you!
NOTE: I do not condone the acts mentioned above, I was just using them as examples for the discussion.