The Inklings, sure.
Possibly Isabelle if she continues to undoubtedly steal the spotlight from the AC Trio of Nook-Resetti-Slider, yeah. Something from Generation 7 or 8 to take priority over Greninja, likely. But Azura and Cross? Let me say why I have extreme doubt for either of them in response to that video.
One of the major reasons he even begins to mention Cross is because of how Xenoblade is a huge series... Since when? The series only spans two games, and neither of them have reached house-hold success the way the "big series" in Smash. For comparison,
Fire Emblem Fates sold 206,675 copies in its first week alone., whereas
Splatoon has sold 584,268 copies after 13 weeks of sale. Sales are not the end all for popularity of course, but when
it only sold 85,000 copies in its first week and only over 133,000 copies since June (half the length Splatoon has been out yet only a quarter of the success), calling it a
big franchise is a
very bold statement, especially since you don't even need numbers to know how much series like Mario, Zelda, Pokemon, Fire Emblem, and Animal Crossing all crush it. Xenoblade is not a big franchise. It is a
great franchise, with a devoted fanbase that created Operation Rainfall and critical claim. That does not mean it is
big. Those are entirely separate things.
In regards to Cross himself, the arguments used were "He's the character you actually play as" and "They could probably do something unique with his guns". The former is very shallow reasoning to choose him over Elma, while the latter is a defeated point in itself. Smash is attempting to avoid gun and realistic weaponry in order to keep a low rating, so when Cross's entire thing is use said realistic gun, that alone will not go well for fitting into Smash Bros. Even that could have been a forgivable point though if something was actually said about
how it could be unique. The video merely tosses out "unique" like a buzzword and just moves on from there, clearly showing how Cross isn't unique if an original idea doesn't immediately spring to mind for him.
Azura, meanwhile, is another character-of-the-month that will spoil
waaaaay before Smash 5 ever comes to be. Are we expecting Fire Emblem to receive no new entries in the time between Fates and Smash 5? Because unless that's the case, she'll just be yet another face that had her time in the limelight for a couple years until the next entry comes out, where people will be jumping the bandwagon for
that character while cynics like me use the exact same argument. Rinse and repeat until Smash 5 is publicly announced and we finally know what the most recent Fire Emblem before Smash 5 will be, and that game's Lord or Azura-equivalent will be the frontrunner.
And did we seriously have to hear "She's a female" as a point towards her inclusion? Never mind the fact that
not using a sword was a selling point he unironically used,
why on earth are people still using gender to argue anything for character inclusion? It has never been one of Sakurai's criteria nor has it ever affected the quality of gameplay in any way. If her appearance as a woman and aesthetics of dancing and lancing is supposed to be the best arguments he uses to say she's one of the most likely characters, this Loves Smash guy has no valuable insight in Smash Speculation.
And if we
really want to get saucy, Sami of Advance Wars and Shantae of her series each have the same niches as Cross and Azura while having much larger support-bases and over a decade more of existence to boot.