• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Discussion/Arguement : religion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Purple

Hi guys!
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
10,383
Location
Duluth, Georgia
I feel we never really get to discuss subjects, but are instead just immediately supposed to choose a side and fight each other over it.

However, the question have has nothing to do religion exist, but is it needed? The idea of knowing that there is a higher being that can punish you for morally wrong decisions.

I do think so, some cops are crooked and you really can't feel like you are safe; hence why people turn to god or some sort of religion. That religion gives a person who virtually has every reason in the world to steal, kill, commit adultery, etc. a person that they can say 'this guy will punish me for doing this'.

discuss, agree, disagree.
 

Jam Stunna

Writer of Fortune
BRoomer
Joined
May 6, 2006
Messages
6,450
Location
Hartford, CT
3DS FC
0447-6552-1484
I'm not religious, but I think that there's more to people's belief in God than a desire for cosmic justice.
 

Riddle

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
1,656
Location
Rochester, NY
I'm not religious either and I don't go around stealing things. However, religion can give some benefits for many people such as a sense of consequences and something to live for.

However, one thing that religion also does is justify the persecution of others. Homosexuals is just one example of this that is disturbing.
 

Purple

Hi guys!
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
10,383
Location
Duluth, Georgia
But that seems to the depend on the person Riddle. If a person wanted something to go their way, they would change things whether or not it was because of their religion, their way of living, etc.

The religion itself is pretty straight forward about what is right or wrong, just like any other rule book; anything not in the rules should be considered fair game.

I will agree that (for example, homosexuals) peopel can use their religion to say homosexuality is not allowed, but if their religion didn't exist i'm sure they would find another reason just as rediculous to justify their homophobia.
 

Riddle

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
1,656
Location
Rochester, NY
Yeah but it would be harder to gain support. Now people can just invoke the bible to convince people that homosexuality is wrong. If the bible didn't say that it was wrong then there would be far less homophobia I believe.
 

KrazyGlue

Smash Champion
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
2,302
Location
Northern Virginia
However, the question have has nothing to do religion exist, but is it needed?
I'm sorry, I'm just having trouble understanding what you are asking here. Clarification, please? :)



Anyway, religion is what you make of it. Some people feel compelled by their religion or religious God(s) to avoid violence. Others use it as a reason to persecute and discriminate against others. I don't think it is the religion itself that causes (or prevents) such violence, but rather how the religion is taught to or interpreted by an individual.

On another note, Jam is right: there is more to the belief of God than just some need for justice. Religion is important to people for other reasons, such as the need to find inner peace.

I would say that Religion is important to the world, but so is religious freedom.

(I'm not religious either :))

Riddle, I agree with you that homophobia would be far less present if there weren't any anti-homosexual implications in the Bible. However, I would also argue that such tendencies are often the product of the way the religion is taught. If people weren't brought up in an environment that was anti-homosexual, I think they would be more open in their opinions on the issue, or at least less violent. I have plenty of Christian friends, however they weren't brought up in a vehemently anti-homosexual environment, and as such they recognize that some people have different tendencies that need to be respected.
 

Purple

Hi guys!
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
10,383
Location
Duluth, Georgia
That part of the post wasn't entirely important, all i was saying is that the arguement isn't about whether there is a god, but rather is there a need for a higher being such as a god.
 

AltF4

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Dec 13, 2005
Messages
5,042
Location
2.412 – 2.462 GHz
I'm not religious, but I think that there's more to people's belief in God than a desire for cosmic justice.
I'm not so convinced. I think a great deal of people mistake wish-thinking for actual belief.

There is a great deal of difference between wishing that your recently deceased family member is "in a better place", and actually thinking that it's true. And when I talk to people about this sort of thing, I tend to get an answer similar to: "I just have to believe that XXXX is in a better place, because the alternative is too tragic."



But more directly to the OP:

This is just a poorly worded rephrasing of the classical theist argument: "If there is no god, then what is the basis of morality?"

Well, this challenge has already been refuted 2500 years ago by Socrates in The Euthyphro. Making an appeal to a god doesn't help you decide what is and isn't moral. You still have to make up your own mind about the matter. Which, not coincidentally, is what religious people do anyway.

It should come as no surprise that readers of the bible skip over the parts that say to stone to death disobedient children. Or the parts that encourage **** and genocide. Because we all know, inherent to our very makeup as social creatures, that these things are wrong.
 

Eor

Banned via Warnings
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
9,963
Location
Bed
Personally I find your definition of religion limiting. Not all of them believe in a higher being that punish you for wrong doings, nor do they all believe in an afterlife.
 

Purple

Hi guys!
Joined
Mar 26, 2009
Messages
10,383
Location
Duluth, Georgia
Personally I find your definition of religion limiting. Not all of them believe in a higher being that punish you for wrong doings, nor do they all believe in an afterlife.
now that i think about it, my comments seemed to be based more towards christianity than all religions :ohwell:
 

Sucumbio

Smash Chachacha
Moderator
Writing Team
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
8,447
Location
wahwahweewah
Heh, there's actually quite a bit in your OP that I disagree with...

I feel we never really get to discuss subjects, but are instead just immediately supposed to choose a side and fight each other over it.
Just curious, but why do you feel this way?

However, the question have has nothing to do religion exist, but is it needed? The idea of knowing that there is a higher being that can punish you for morally wrong decisions.
Ok, so your topic has nothing to do with whether or not religion (a moral enforcer) exists, but rather is it necessary...

and you answer it with:

I do think so, some cops are crooked and you really can't feel like you are safe; hence why people turn to god or some sort of religion [that] gives a person who virtually has every reason in the world to steal, kill, commit adultery, etc. a person that they can say 'this guy will punish me for doing this'.
See, your question is only half accurate in asking. Religion has many purposes, one of which is to help provide a moral center for ourselves to reason against. Religion also provides us with a means of organized collaboration over a set of principles or values. This is technically more important, as our own Brain is capable of reasoning right/wrong when it's working correctly. The community, the congregation, the spirituality of religion provides a deep sense of belonging, purpose and fulfillment.

So in my case, a crooked cop doesn't make me turn to God. It makes me pray for the cop's soul.

Now to answer your question, Yes. Since the birth of the hunter-gatherer society we have required shamans and holy people. The Digital Age has seen an influx of atheists who feel it unnecessary to rely on such tribal mentalities as organized religion, while ironically participating in other tribal mentalities over the Internet. Regardless of how you paint the picture, Spirituality will -always- be centric to the Human condition. When it becomes not so, is when we become inhuman. Why? Well that's a different topic. The why is held deep within your own personal and spiritual beliefs, the why is ... the reason for going to church, synagogue, temple, Saturday Night Bowling, SWF, what have you.

I'm not so convinced. I think a great deal of people mistake wish-thinking for actual belief.

There is a great deal of difference between wishing that your recently deceased family member is "in a better place", and actually thinking that it's true. And when I talk to people about this sort of thing, I tend to get an answer similar to: "I just have to believe that XXXX is in a better place, because the alternative is too tragic."
Hm... in terms of religion there's really no difference between hope and faith nor between faith and belief. So hoping your loved ones are in heaven is the same as believing they are. I assume you meant hope when you said "wish-thinking" ie wishful thinking. I just, I dunno, I guess I just don't care for the tone of that phraseology, to me it connotes delusion.

It should come as no surprise that readers of the bible skip over the parts that say to stone to death disobedient children. Or the parts that encourage **** and genocide. Because we all know, inherent to our very makeup as social creatures, that these things are wrong.
Wait, you're suggesting people -didn't- use to read those parts? And live by them? Cause... they sure did. And yet we've always been social creatures with a biological moral center. No, what's changed is our sociologically acceptable practices. What should come as no surprise is that today's Christians (for the most part) don't stone their kids to death.
 

AltF4

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Dec 13, 2005
Messages
5,042
Location
2.412 – 2.462 GHz
Hm... in terms of religion there's really no difference between hope and faith nor between faith and belief. So hoping your loved ones are in heaven is the same as believing they are. I assume you meant hope when you said "wish-thinking" ie wishful thinking. I just, I dunno, I guess I just don't care for the tone of that phraseology, to me it connotes delusion.
This is purely semantic, but there is a significant difference between hope and belief. Hope is a statement about what you want something to be. Belief is a statement about what you think something is.

I hope that my car insurance will cover the cost of my laptop which was recently stolen. I believe, however, that they will not. Two very different things.

What I called "wish-thinking" is what happens when you muddle these two things together. It's what happens when someone wants something to be true so badly, that they lie to themselves long enough until they forget it's a lie.


Wait, you're suggesting people -didn't- use to read those parts? And live by them? Cause... they sure did. And yet we've always been social creatures with a biological moral center. No, what's changed is our sociologically acceptable practices. What should come as no surprise is that today's Christians (for the most part) don't stone their kids to death.
My point is that morals cannot be derived from an appeal to a god. The best you can do is take your own independent moral compass and find justification for it in religious texts.

It's how most people think of religions
Presumably you're referring to buddhism? How would you respond to the claim that buddhism isn't a religion at all, and is more of a guiding philosophy? If it makes no appeals to the supernatural, then would its adherents not necessarily be atheist?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom