Razor
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2005
- Messages
- 265
this might not be the exact place to post this...but i was wondering what ppl think about the counterpick rules.
Right now, the most common way is : loser pick stage, winner char pick, loser counter char pick. I was wondering why we can't have the char choosing first? Personally, i think that way is more fair.
We could have it like, winner decides what char, loser can counter pick and if he does so then the stage goes random. If the loser doesn't counter pick char then he should be able to choose the stage. That way the random stages are more used and the loser still gets an advantage.
The reason i bring it up is bc i feel like the loser gets too many advantages. I mean it's true that he lost first, but what if the first match was really close? Or if it was lucky? Plus, in any situation, i'd rather know what characters are being used than the stage. any problems with this?
Right now, the most common way is : loser pick stage, winner char pick, loser counter char pick. I was wondering why we can't have the char choosing first? Personally, i think that way is more fair.
We could have it like, winner decides what char, loser can counter pick and if he does so then the stage goes random. If the loser doesn't counter pick char then he should be able to choose the stage. That way the random stages are more used and the loser still gets an advantage.
The reason i bring it up is bc i feel like the loser gets too many advantages. I mean it's true that he lost first, but what if the first match was really close? Or if it was lucky? Plus, in any situation, i'd rather know what characters are being used than the stage. any problems with this?
