• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Can we still be considered clones?<

SmashBrother2008

SmashBrother2008

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
1,227
I know that Ganondorf has been luigified but is it enough that Captain Falcon and Ganondorf are really separate characters now? I'll miss the old days...
 
T

TheREALShadowChaos

Smash Journeyman
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
465
Location
Netherland
SmashBrother2008 said:
No, I think Ike and Marth was a better comparison since Kirby and Dedede have nearly completely different moves. Marth and Ike at least have similar B moves.
Click to expand...
And Ganny and Falcon have same B , down B, up B, and many attacks that look like each other. Both comparisons suck. -_-

But still ganny's attacks are way slower and he feels way different than Falcon.
 
Devil7

Devil7

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Apr 9, 2008
Messages
447
Location
On the edge of Final Destination waiting to kill y
OK seriously the kirby DDD thing was a sarcastic joke. Anyways a clone is supposed to be someone very similar to the original in style and moves. Marth and roy were both close in stratagy and style except for the tipper versus middle sword crap. Dr.M and mario were almost the same except very small exceptions. young link is just a vertically challenged link, but ganny and CF while they have some similar moves they both require far different stratagies unlike the rest of the clones. So no I don't think they are clones because of the play styles require.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom