Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Bowser87There's as much reasons to believe other extinct animals that existed at the same time as Megalodon could still be living said:Quite true, if youhave ever seen "Buggin with Rud" (or something I don't know what the name of the show was), they found a believed to be extinct spider. The spider looked really cool.
Animal planetsmashman90 said:I take it that this show is on either discovery or animal planet.
Not too many experts actually believe the Megalodon is an ancestor to the Great White Shark today.smashman90 said:Well if the megalodon is like its ancestor the great white, then its body must be similar too, meaning that its body is streamlined and torpedoe shaped which would make it fast in the water so that would't stop it from catching whales. Oh, and by the way I have been on Wikipedia but it doesn't have everything on it about megs so you can't rely on just one website, you gotta look at different ones compare and contrast on info. And remember we've only discovered only a fraction of the ocean and that could mean that a megalodon as well as other sea creatures thought to be extinct could still exist.
Exactly, besides it wouldn't completely change a megalodon because of their senses. The only bad thing about that would be that the megalodon would have sensitive eyes since it would live in the dark for so long.Seed of Sorrow said:Also, with the megaladons extraordinary senses such as being able to sense blood from miles of miles away, as well as being able to detect electric current traveling through other creatures, the meg would have adapted quite nicely, seeing as both of these sense would still work in complete darkness. And there are sharks at the bottom of the sea, they are the six-gilled sharks, so, if theses sharks could survve down at the bottom of the ocean, why couldn't the megs?
The icecaps didn't melt in an instant, which could have given megs. some time to adapt. Also, there are sharks in the arctic too, so why couldn't the meg be there? Also (again), there would be enough food to let the meg survive, such as seal lions, penguins, and other sharks, as well as whales.Bowser87 said:-Melting ice caps mean it can't reach whales during summer.
This is where you should have read previous posts. The meg and coelacanth can't be compared, coelacanth is small. If Megalodons were still around without having evolved we'd know about it.smashman90 said:Yeah, and if the coelacanth was able to survive for millions of years without evolving then why not the meg be able to survive..
Megalodon would have had to evolve a lot because the way it was 1,6 million years ago, when it presumably went extinct, it wasn't fit for the environment of today. And 1,6 million years is also way too little time for a giant coastline animal to adapt to life in the abyss. And giant animals generally take more time to evolve.smashman90 said:Also, with the meg's girth that would be able to keep it warm(as well as the blood of its prey, sorry about sounding gross there). Also, the megalodon wouldn't have to evolve much because:
A. It could( and would) rely mainly on its senses.
B. It's metabolism would have slowed down due to low oxygenated water.
C. Adaptation and evolution could occur a lot quicker.
D. It's body might have adapted to cold water.
E. It's body would have developed a luminescent glow to attract mates and prey.
How many times will I have to say it? Get real, the idea of Megalodon feeding on orcas makes no sense. Even if it was 20m long, what could it do exactly against 20+ orcas? It would be suicide. Of course it could attack a solitary orca, but that doesn't exist. And even if there were, say, only 5 orcas, which is also pretty rare, Megalodon wouldn't attack them, because even if he could kill them all, the injuries he would sustain wouldn't make it worth it.smashman90 said:A. Since the meg's appetite would be ravenous in highly oxgenated water, it would be on a feeding frenzy on your precious orcas and whatever else it can find.
Well the shark species Megalodon is closest to usually find food at almost any time of the day. And what's certain is that Megalodon would need a hèll of a lot of food, more than any animal currently living on Earth. And of course if he can't find whales during summer, and if orcas steal their hunt, it becomes a little too much for the shark to bear.smashman90 said:B. Sharks can survive without food for days until they can find food.
They certainly wouldn't hunt a full grown Megalodon, only the young (which is already enough to hurt the species. Before orcas emerged young Megs probably had no predators). The orcas, being the most intelligent sea animals, knew that Megalodons were not only dangerous creatures, but also their fiercest competitors, so they had a lot of reasons to get rid of them when they could. And though I said they wouldn't hunt the adults, they would probably intimidate them to steal their prey. A Megalodon seeing a bunch of orcas coming at him had no choice but to pull out and leave his food.smashman90 said:C. Just because orcas hunt in pods(not packs) doesn't mean that they could take down a megalodon without losing a lot of orca's(and they would have to protect their young).
And if Megalodon decided to go into deep water, what would be the chances for them to meet whales? Only Sperm whales go down there, and only for a few hours a day, so Megalodon's chances to find a whale regularly there would be extremely low.smashman90 said:D. When the ice caps melted, the warm water would be heading down into deeper water, so to keep warm, the meg would have to go into deeper waters and it probably wasn't the only one that had that idea.
E. Whales also like to go deep into water too ya'know, so if you look at D, the whales would have some company waiting for them.
Bowser87 said:And 1,6 million years is also way too little time for a giant coastline animal to adapt to life in the abyss. And giant animals generally take more time to evolve.
As a sidenote I found something very cool, if you guys are all interested in deep sea animals
you'll find this thing neat: The Bloop
Anyway, yes, RaRaRachael, there are plenty of reasons to believe Megalodons are extinct, I enumerated pretty much all of them I think, and they seem to satisfy the scientific community. And you're right Smashman80, if Megalodons still existed, then what about all the other animal from it's era? If the Megalodon survived all the changes to it's environment, what about all those animals that seem to have disappeared for no reason? Some are giant too, giant rhinos, giant kangooroos, giant apes...There are plenty of them, unlike Megalodon, that could live in today's world the same way they were over a million years ago. So why don't the zoocryptologists talk about those animals, instead of one who's extinction makes perfect sense?Megalodon teeth have been discovered that some argue date as recently as 10,000 to 15,000 years ago. This claim is based on the discovery of two teeth by the HMS Challenger (these teeth were dated by estimating the amount of time it took for manganese to accumulate on them, although it is quite possible the teeth were fossilized before being encrusted).
Others have countered that these recent estimates for these teeth are inaccurate, and "claims of post-Pliocene C. megalodon ... are erroneous", being based on outdated testing and methodology. [1] Roesch and others also note that Megalodons were probably coastal sharks, and that deep-sea survival is extremely unlikely.