1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Breakdown of Armada and Hungrybox in 2017 (Lovely Graph Included)

Discussion in 'Melee Discussion' started by singstall, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:44 PM.

  1. singstall

    singstall
    Expand Collapse
    Smash Rookie

    Joined:
    Sunday
    Messages:
    1
    Location:
    Woodbury, MN
    3DS FC:
    3523-2496-2466
    Switch FC:
    SW-4001-3948-9220
    In case you're here for the graph, here you go: https://imgur.com/a/3NKwa

    [​IMG]

    So for a while, I've had a nagging thought at the back of my brain that maybe recency bias gave Hungrybox the title of #1 in 2017. Sure, he was undoubtedly the best player in the world when it ended, but Armada felt so unbeatable during the first while that I wondered if Armada actually had the better resumé. After all, he won the two most prestigious tournaments of the year.

    I can't really address prestige head on, I'm not the PGR, but I did come up with a two step way of addressing things.

    First, I introduced dynasty points, a concept from FiveThirtyEight (although apparently one of their writers did use it in an NBA Insider article first) that acknowledges that the difference between getting first and getting third is a heck of a lot more meaningful than, say, the difference between getting third and fifth. Average placing is a pretty flawed statistic and I have a lot more to say about it, but let me lay out the approach in simple terms.

    For each tournament placing you have, you get 1/x points, where x is the number of people who placed equal or better to you. This is pretty easy for two players who never placed lower than fourth all year, so x is just their placing. You get a whole point if you win! Some might say this is even a bit lenient, that placing fourth four times is not as good as winning once. Which, yeah, but it's still pretty nifty.

    So which tournaments do I want to look at? This is going to be controversial, so I had to make hard choices that I'm sure not everyone will agree with. I only counted tournaments where at least two top six members were present and /playing seriously/. I don't count Mango at Frame Perfect Series 2, Leffen at Full Bloom 3 (tough call), or Plup playing secondaries (CEO Dreamland, Bad Moon Rising 2, even Shine 2017).

    Also controversially, I decided to not give Hungrybox his locals, where he won quite a few CFL Smackdown titles over Plup. This also got rid of Smash Conference 69. Speaking of Smash Conference 69, I /have/ left in Genesis 4 for Hungrybox, despite him playing with a broken finger.

    So what I did was I took these tournaments and calculated the average number of dynasty points per tournament. Remember that .5 is second place and 1 is first place.

    Armada: (1+1+1+1/2+1/3+1+1+1/2+1/4+1/3+1/2+1)/12=.7014

    Hungrybox: (1/2+1/4+1/2+1+1+1/3+1+1/3+1+1/2+1+1/3+1/2+1/2+1/4+1+1+1+1+1+1)/21=.7143

    Then I wondered if maybe these got a little warped by the smaller events that Hungrybox attended, like Saints Gaming Live, Frame Perfect Series 2, Too Hot To Handle, etc (although Armada also has two wins with only Leffen present).

    So I decided to try this with weighted averages. I decided to weight each tournament by the number of OTHER top six members present who were playing seriously.

    Armada: (5+1+5+3/2+4/3+1+5+4/2+5/4+2/3+5/2+1)/41=.6646

    Hungrybox: (1/2+5/4+5/2+1+2+1/3+4+3/3+4+1/2+1+5/3+2/2+1/2+3/4+3+4+5+2+1+5)/59=.7119

    This is the data in the graph I made, which is again visualized here: https://imgur.com/a/3NKwa

    Conclusion: Hungrybox actually does have a really solid claim to having the better 2017 resumé to the point of maybe having locked it down, although the gap between Armada and Hungrybox after, say, Super Smash Con 2017 got to look impossible to bridge.

    The data fits the narrative almost hilariously well, with Summit 5 having been pretty much a must-win for Armada, exactly as he said at the time.

    I appreciate anyone calling out if I messed up the data, because I just did this while watching the NBA Playoffs.

    UPDATE: I made a graph of the entire top six during 2017, here:

    [​IMG]
     
    #1 singstall, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:44 PM
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2018 at 7:12 AM
    Pauer likes this.
  2. zuloon

    zuloon
    Expand Collapse
    Smash Journeyman

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    Messages:
    374
    Not sure if srs?

    Everyone knows Hbox is the GOAT

    You don't need fancy graphs to see that he destroys everyone who goes up against him
     

Share This Page

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)

We know you don't like ads
Why not buy Premium?