• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

best defenceive characters in ssbm

ChozenOne

Smash Champion
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
2,570
Location
Cheerleading Practice
1st Post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Peach due to her having a move that acts as a shield forcing your opponent away... or Jiggs due to her play requiring the player to wait for your opponent's mistakes....

edit- what Wak said..
 

thatsmybutta

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
252
Location
New Jersey
defensive* you mean lol

im thinkin young link as well because its so easy to avoid your foe with projectiles with that little prick
 

ti83pop

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Nov 21, 2006
Messages
301
Location
TN
I'd say between Peach, Yl, or a great offensive player...but that has nothing t do with any characters. Samus is pretty good with missile spamming, but...I don't think she's as defensive.
 

Red Exodus

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 7, 2006
Messages
4,494
Location
Hell
Well the best defense is a good offense. If your opponent is too busy getting the snot beat out of them they won't have time to attack you, which means Fox is probably the best defensive player.
 

Red Exodus

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 7, 2006
Messages
4,494
Location
Hell
Since when is an opinion right or wrong or good or bad? You have a better opinion then?
 

ChozenOne

Smash Champion
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
2,570
Location
Cheerleading Practice
You can infact have a right/wrong opinion.

For example...

If it is your opinion that eating babys is morally right.. then you are wrong.

There are two points of view on the matter of opinions... the first is this- assume everyone did/believed your view to be correct... would that be good or bad. example- killing people/lying. If everyone killed each other the world would be thrown into chaos, or if everyone lied then no one could trust anyone else..

However the counter to this argument is- The best for the most.. therefore one could argue that killing is just when it benifits all.. when normally killing would be wrong. therefore killing Hitler wouldn't be considered bad due to it's positive effects on so many people...

This is really a question of Tolerance Vs. Acceptance. Tolerance means that i tolerate your idea.. it may be wrong, but it's cool that you have it. Acceptance means that every idea has equal "rightness" and that everyone can have their own opinion, and that everyone is equally right. This is manytimes what you are "taught" in public schools, and many people when speaking on the taboo subject of religion.. not everyone can be right.. deal with it.

Good Day Sirs.
 
Top Bottom