![](http://smashboards.com/writer/pokemon64ism/Bury.png)
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
http://smashboards.com/threads/mechanics-techniques-discussion.368206/page-40Can you show me evidence of this? Because according to this http://smashboards.com/threads/shields-in-smash-4.381183 and everything else I've seen there is less shield stun then in Brawl. I do agree shields are weaker in the whole stupid "I'm just going to stand here and hold shield because I can" aspect from Brawl but just the sheer lack of safety moves have on shield in Smash 4 makes it a more powerful (if less universal) option then in Brawl in my opinion.
http://smashboards.com/threads/mechanics-techniques-discussion.368206/page-40Can you show me evidence of this? Because according to this http://smashboards.com/threads/shields-in-smash-4.381183 and everything else I've seen there is less shield stun then in Brawl. I do agree shields are weaker in the whole stupid "I'm just going to stand here and hold shield because I can" aspect from Brawl but just the sheer lack of safety moves have on shield in Smash 4 makes it a more powerful (if less universal) option then in Brawl in my opinion.
Okay if that's true then shields were definitely weakened in the transition to Smash 4. Where did the old data come from then? Because I saw multiple sources say that there was less shield stun in Smash 4 then there was in Brawl earlier on.http://smashboards.com/threads/mechanics-techniques-discussion.368206/page-40
This page reading down.
The data you quoted I don't think is accurate anymore.
That said I don't agree, the cast as a whole is safer on block than in Brawl and I do think it is noticeably so.
Then they either go to the ledge or hit you with an aerial or just land and hit you.
Then they're either blind, ignorant, or stupid. Why would anyone get up attack against an up tilting Ganondorf?What if the opponent does a edge get-up attack?
If someone whiffs a move with enough end lag to get hit by an up tilting Ganondorf then they deserve to get hit. There is literally no reason to miss when he's standing still.What if the opponent uses a move with extremely high end lag against U-Tilt?
Why can't they? It's literally just holding shield and tapping a direction. And there's also the alternative of simply hitting the Ganondorf who's just standing there.What if the opponent can't roll out of the way?
It's called spacing. It makes you not get hit by stupid things like that.And most important question...
How would you know if U-Tilt won't end up hitting the opponent from behind Ganondorf? (It's happened to many of my opponents before, too.)
There's a scenario where they can't manage to land an attack on Ganondorf if he's too far from them and they ignore the ledge. Even if they get to the ledge, there's the possibility his sourspot will hit them.Then they either go to the ledge or hit you with an aerial or just land and hit you.
Then they're either blind, ignorant, or stupid. Why would anyone get up attack against an up tilting Ganondorf?
If someone whiffs a move with enough end lag to get hit by an up tilting Ganondorf then they deserve to get hit.
There is literally no reason to miss when he's standing still.
Why can't they? It's literally just holding shield and tapping a direction.
And there's also the alternative of simply hitting the Ganondorf who's just standing there.
It's called spacing. It makes you not get hit by stupid things like that.
Ganondorf's up tilt has 81 frames of startup. If you can not manage to either hit Ganondorf or pick a proper defensive option in 81 frames then you simply should not be playing the game without items on.There's a scenario where they can't manage to land an attack on Ganondorf if he's too far from them and they ignore the ledge. Even if they get to the ledge, there's the possibility his sourspot will hit them.
Link, maybe?
No argument on that.
Some characters might not make it out in time and could get hit by the sourspot hitbox still (and might I add that that sucker has some incredible range?).
The alternate might be a laggy enough attack with some characters for them to get hit.
Sometimes spacing goes horribly wrong or horrifyingly right. Case in point, Warlock Punch hitting Pit from behind Ganondorf (my Ganondorf) and being OHKO'd. Same thing happened with ZSS, but that was when she got hit literally in mid-air. Another thing happened with Ganondorf's F-Tilt hitting an opponent from behind Ganondorf, and Link's Dash Attack sending someone backward, and a lot more examples of just pitiful spacing with opponents. You got to love memory, right?
Methods of testing change, thinks we learned change as a result.Okay if that's true then shields were definitely weakened in the transition to Smash 4. Where did the old data come from then? Because I saw multiple sources say that there was less shield stun in Smash 4 then there was in Brawl earlier on.
That being said though, I still think shield is the strongest defensive option in Smash 4. Yes shield brakes have gone from more or less impossible to very unlikely, but the fact that the majority of the shield braking moves are either unsafe on shield, laggy, or huge commitments means you need to put a lot of pressure on someone's shield without giving them a chance to regenerate it. And when you consider moves are still not that much safer on shield (only stronger hits benefit notably from the change) and how good rolls are at reliving pressure that situation doesn't come up very often. So as long as you don't get baited into dropping shield from something like an empty hop it's still a very strong option.
Thank you actually for correcting me, now I know. (And knowing's half the battle)