TheZoologist
Smash Ace
I would cry literal tears of joy if this happened.
Would be great if we got to see something like this this year.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I would cry literal tears of joy if this happened.
Would be great if we got to see something like this this year.
So mojang wasn't contacted at all prior to September. Has rare said anything about smash during ultimate's development?
Hmmmm interestingThere was a problem fetching the tweet
This is the only thing I could find.
Keep in mind this is definitely pre DLC.
I don't think they have said anything about Smash Bros aside from the retweeting of the K.Rool trailer. I doubt 2 months is enough time for negotiations to pan out on Mojang's side. Then again Mojang is totally owned by Microsoft and could have no input on putting MC content in smash. If Papageno's theory is correct, then the June 2018 meeting at E3 between Phil, Nintendo and Sakurai could've been the start to talks about Banjo for DLC. Again we now have Cuphead on Switch, a game that would still require a lot of time to port it over, meaning that Microsoft and Nintendo were in talks for a long time before Phil's "Yep" tweet and the supposed E3 meeting.So mojang wasn't contacted at all prior to September. Has rare said anything about smash during ultimate's development?
She never said they weren't approached; she never said anything definite.Hmmm so while browsing the Gamefaqs board, I stumbled upon a thread where someone posted a video of Mojang saying in a conference that they had not been approached by Nintendo for anything. This was in September 2018. I feel like the video might have been discussed here, but I'm not sure. Now it doesn't mean that Mojang couldn't have been approached after, but if it's true that Mojang had absolutely no involvement in Smash prior to September 2018, then Vergeben was wrong on Minecraft content being in Smash.
Well, Maybe they should make a dedicated indie crossover fighter.Even Indie characters deserve better than Brawlout.
Seems my March theory was debunked be cause of the Nindies direct. In fully expect a reveal during the spring update direct.I think her dodginess was because she had to be very careful when put on the spot about Steve being in Smash. As we know, Smash speculation is crazy and it would only add more fuel to fire even if she neither confirmed or denied.
On another note, there’s not much time left this month if we’re going to get a new reveal. Unfortunately it seems we have to wait until E3, but hopefully it’ll be worth the wait and we can see our beloved bear and bird again.
Where can I find these?Not sure if you guys have been paying attention, but Polar Panda has been very heavily hinting at Rare Replay on Switch recently.
YupI’m still hanging on to the duck hunt dog theory we made a couple weeks ago.
Couldnt agree more. I hate the flavor of the month picks just as much as i hate the bandwagon fans that happen after a "leaker" says we're gonna get someone. There are some serious gaming icons that aren't in yet and you think a character like Sans deserves it? I'm as big of an undertale fan as there is but I think you should need a bit of a longer resume. (then again bayo got in only having 2 games so what do i know)Well, Maybe they should make a dedicated indie crossover fighter.
If your a 3rd Party then then I believe you really have to have earn your way into the roster such as being an icon and playing an big part of Nintendo's history, (If it was up to me than I probably wouldn't even include Bayonetta or Joker), But this is Sakurai's game not mine so he calls the shots and at least their bigger than your average indie.
Super Smash Bros is the "Big League's" when it comes to crossover I mean look at some of the 3rd Party's impacts and legacy:
Pac-Man: Namcos Mascot, Likely the 1st thing that pops up in your head when you think of the 1980's and help defined that era and the arcade, Along side Mario is the most recognizable video game character in history.
Sonic: Sega's Mascot, The "Blue Blur" brought attitude and speed as he was created as "Mario's Main Rival" when Nintendo and Sega were going at each other's throats during their iconic "Console Wars" of the 1990's.
Ryu: Only 2nd to Mega Man as the face of Capcom and is the most popular and iconic fighting game character in the world, Street Fighter 2 is what really put fighting games in arcades and on the map.
That's "Elite" company right there, Plus there's bigger fish to fry like Banjo-Kazooie, Crash Bandicoot, Rayman and Heihachi, Part of me also kind of gets annoyed when every once in a while when there is some new hot indie game/flavor of the month game and then the developers and fans think that's enough to warrant them an invitation to the ultimate crossover and biggest stage of them all that is Super Smash Bros.
Lycan Rex here is the tweet.Uhhh guys....Polar Panda who is an extremely credible leaker has just claimed that they have a source that is saying that Rare Replay is coming to Switch. https://twitter.com/MultimediaHQ/status/1108525029371854848 Whether he's in smash or not, Banjo may be coming home guys.....
I can understand wanting your favorite video game character to make the roster, But I believe somewhere the line has to be drawn, That's what makes Super Smash Bros so special and have meaning, You have the biggest names in Nintendo/Gaming going at it, If just we let anyone in then that just opens the floodgates and makes the roster more convoluted and not as special.
We have a lot of "anyone" in the first party side already. Third party side is a bit more iffy; but after Joker, Bayo and echoes, I don't think the threshold for it too high either.I can understand wanting your favorite video game character to make the roster, But I believe somewhere the line has to be drawn, That's what makes Super Smash Bros so special and have meaning, You have the biggest names in Nintendo/Gaming going at it, If just we let anyone in then that just opens the floodgates and makes the roster more convoluted and not as special.
If you read one of my earlier post, 1st Party Characters have the advantage and normally get a pass because obviously they are own by Nintendo, That's why we see lesser or side characters like Ice Climbers or Pit make the cut or can understand someone wanting Dixie Kong or Bandana Dee ,But I think we can agree 3rd Party Characters should have made an impact in gaming and Nintendo's history. Like I said before Bayonetta and Joker are questionable picks in my opinion and if it was up to me I probably would not have consider them, But this is Sakurai's game not mine so he calls the shots.We have a lot of "anyone" in the first party side already. Third party side is a bit more iffy; but after Joker, Bayo and echoes, I don't think the threshold for it too high either.
I'd want third party additions to be from critically acclaimed, noteworthy games but "opening the floodgates" argument feels like just gatekeeping.
I do agree for the most part, but I just don't believe the more successful Indies that don't make it into Ultimate should be left to be playable in an unpolished mess like Brawlout, unless of course the Devs wanted their character to be in the game. Now Rivals of Aether is the different story. I wouldn't mind seeing Cuphead and Mugman, Shantae, Toriel and other well known indie characters in RoA because Ori and Shovel Knight were handled pretty well, in an already great platform fighter.Well, Maybe they should make a dedicated indie crossover fighter.
If your a 3rd Party then then I believe you really have to have earn your way into the roster such as being an icon and playing an big part of Nintendo's history, (If it was up to me than I probably wouldn't even include Bayonetta or Joker), But this is Sakurai's game not mine so he calls the shots and at least their bigger than your average indie.
Super Smash Bros is the "Big League's" when it comes to crossover I mean look at some of the 3rd Party's impacts and legacy:
Pac-Man: Namcos Mascot, Likely the 1st thing that pops up in your head when you think of the 1980's and help defined that era and the arcade, Along side Mario is the most recognizable video game character in history.
Sonic: Sega's Mascot, The "Blue Blur" brought attitude and speed as he was created as "Mario's Main Rival" when Nintendo and Sega were going at each other's throats during their iconic "Console Wars" of the 1990's.
Ryu: Only 2nd to Mega Man as the face of Capcom and is the most popular and iconic fighting game character in the world, Street Fighter 2 is what really put fighting games in arcades and on the map.
That's "Elite" company right there, Plus there's bigger fish to fry like Banjo-Kazooie, Crash Bandicoot, Rayman and Heihachi, Part of me also kind of gets annoyed when every once in a while when there is some new hot indie game/flavor of the month game and then the developers and fans think that's enough to warrant them an invitation to the ultimate crossover and biggest stage of them all that is Super Smash Bros.
I couldn't have said that last paragraph better myself, Pretty much took the words out of my mouth.I wouldn't really even consider Pit a lesser character, Ice Climbers for certain, but Kid Icarus used to be on the same pedestal as Metroid and Zelda back on the NES, and even got a Gameboy sequel, just as Metroid did. So, Smash only recognized it as a valued franchise to Nintendo's history... I don't believe Ice Climbers is a "valued franchise to Nintendo's history" in the same way, but it's a first party in-house retro famicom/NES entry, so it still get's a pass.
In-house first party franchises that are unrecognized with a playable character in Smash are very few, at least the notable and successful ones anyway. I'd say ARMS, maybe Rhythm Heaven and Advance Wars, but it's hard to say when one of them becomes "notable"... Then there's the franchises that were created by developers outside Nintendo, but completely first party, like Chibi Robo, Golden Sun, Starfy, etc, I feel like they have most difficult uphill battles for playable spots, since so few of them are embraced by Nintendo as much as their in-house studio created properties are.
And of course, third parties so far have been pretty recognizable brands, and I agree with you Chunkyslugger, Bayonetta and Persona are the least recognizable of them, but at least for their cases, they've been critical darlings and their popularity quickly on the rise, regardless of Smash.
Banjo-Kazooie though, is in a category all to itself, I feel. It's not first party, but it's not exactly treated like other third parties either. In some ways, I want to say it's like Pokemon, err, it was like Pokemon, created and developed by an outside studio, but got a huge backing by first party Nintendo, which allowed it to break through to the mainstream unlike most other out of house developed Nintendo games. It's certainly big enough unlike Chibi Robo or Golden Sun, or at least was treated like any other first party Nintendo property at the time. If it was still a Nintendo property, it would have gotten into Smash by now. Of course it's now owned by Microsoft, so it's completely third party, but the reasons I feel it should get into Smash are reasons that treat it like it's still completely tied to Nintendo, as Banjo-Kazooie are Nintendo icons. Second party icons, but still part of Nintendo all the same. Which makes them different from any other possible newcomer.
I only theorize Sans over Frisk because of the character's immense popularity (both in Japan and outside of it) as well as his recognizability. He's essentially the mascot given his familiar visage representing Undertale. Also, he actually fights in the game. But I could see Toby Fox suggesting any old random Undertale character for Nintendo to use, if they ever approached him about it anyway.Regarding undertale, wouldn't sakurai rather go for the human protagonist? He usually goes for the protagonist before anyone else.
Even just banjo's games is enough in my book.In my heart I swear if we get Rare Replay we get Banjo in smash no questions asked.
I was thinking the same thing. Has there ever been a case where a side character was revealed first instead of the main protagonist? Sure Sans is a popular character from Undertale and his fans would like to see him in Smash, but it would be kind of an odd choice to reveal Sans in Smash first over the human protagonist. If the Undertale rep for Smash didn't have to be a playable main protagonist then personally I would choose Toriel first over Sans. I'm just not a big fan of Sans, but I don't dislike him.Regarding undertale, wouldn't sakurai rather go for the human protagonist? He usually goes for the protagonist before anyone else.
My only problem with that is that Sans dosen't really seem like the right fighter. Sure you have a boss fight with him but that would be a massive spoiler to the Genocide run. I dont mind an Undertale/Deltarune fighter, I just dont see Sans working when Kris, Susie, Undyne, Papyrus, and Asgore would fit better as fighters.I only theorize Sans over Frisk because of the character's immense popularity (both in Japan and outside of it) as well as his recognizability. He's essentially the mascot given his familiar visage representing Undertale. Also, he actually fights in the game. But I could see Toby Fox suggesting any old random Undertale character for Nintendo to use, if they ever approached him about it anyway.
Kinda like Pikachu for Pokemon, after Red & Blue (and Green), Pikachu was seen as the mascot, but in the games themselves, he was really no different than any other wild Pokemon in terms of importance, he was just the chosen mascot very early on, and Smash recognized that in him. And maybe it's the same for Sans, though he's more or less the "unofficial" mascot of Undertale.
Pokémon?I was thinking the same thing. Has there ever been a case where a side character was revealed first instead of the main protagonist? Sure Sans is a popular character from Undertale and his fans would like to see him in Smash, but it would be kind of an odd choice to reveal Sans in Smash first over the human protagonist. If the Undertale rep for Smash didn't have to be a playable main protagonist then personally I would choose Toriel first over Sans. I'm just not a big fan of Sans, but I don't dislike him.
I can't agree with Kid Icarus being on the same pedestal as Metroid and Zelda. Sure, it was a game that had some attention, but nobody knew who the hell Pit was prior to Brawl in all honesty and Kid Icarus was basically one of MANY left behind IPs by that point. I don't think it was any "valued franchise" to Nintendo, I just think Sakurai took a very active interest in the series and decided to play with it just like Ice Climbers. I think that's just Sakurai bias (Which I don't see as inherently problematic, it's cool to resurrect series just because you feel like it).I wouldn't really even consider Pit a lesser character, Ice Climbers for certain, but Kid Icarus used to be on the same pedestal as Metroid and Zelda back on the NES, and even got a Gameboy sequel, just as Metroid did. So, Smash only recognized it as a valued franchise to Nintendo's history... I don't believe Ice Climbers is a "valued franchise to Nintendo's history" in the same way, but it's a first party in-house retro famicom/NES entry, so it still get's a pass.
In-house first party franchises that are unrecognized with a playable character in Smash are very few, at least the notable and successful ones anyway. I'd say ARMS, maybe Rhythm Heaven and Advance Wars, but it's hard to say when one of them becomes "notable"... Then there's the franchises that were created by developers outside Nintendo, but completely first party, like Chibi Robo, Golden Sun, Starfy, etc, I feel like they have most difficult uphill battles for playable spots, since so few of them are embraced by Nintendo as much as their in-house studio created properties are.
And of course, third parties so far have been pretty recognizable brands, and I agree with you Chunkyslugger, Bayonetta and Persona are the least recognizable of them, but at least for their cases, they've been critical darlings and their popularity quickly on the rise, regardless of Smash.
Banjo-Kazooie though, is in a category all to itself, I feel. It's not first party, but it's not exactly treated like other third parties either. In some ways, I want to say it's like Pokemon, err, it was like Pokemon, created and developed by an outside studio, but got a huge backing by first party Nintendo, which allowed it to break through to the mainstream unlike most other out of house developed Nintendo games. It's certainly big enough unlike Chibi Robo or Golden Sun, or at least was treated like any other first party Nintendo property at the time. If it was still a Nintendo property, it would have gotten into Smash by now. Of course it's now owned by Microsoft, so it's completely third party, but the reasons I feel it should get into Smash are reasons that treat it like it's still completely tied to Nintendo, as Banjo-Kazooie are Nintendo icons. Second party icons, but still part of Nintendo all the same. Which makes them different from any other possible newcomer.
I could see Sakurai going for any of the Undertale protagonists. Of course it makes perfect sense that the protagonist would be added first, but I feel like the supporting cast is a lot more interesting and they are the people that you actually interact with and fight. It's sort of a coin toss if they would add the human protagonist or one of the monsters, but if it's the latter, my money is on Sans or Papyrus. They are both some of the most iconic moments from that game, and if Sans is too much of a spoiler, Papyrus is always another interesting option.Regarding undertale, wouldn't sakurai rather go for the human protagonist? He usually goes for the protagonist before anyone else.
I feel like if we get any sort of Undertale character Sans is a lock. He's the most recognizable by a long shot.I could see Sakurai going for any of the Undertale protagonists. Of course it makes perfect sense that the protagonist would be added first, but I feel like the supporting cast is a lot more interesting and they are the people that you actually interact with and fight. It's sort of a coin toss if they would add the human protagonist or one of the monsters, but if it's the latter, my money is on Sans or Papyrus. They are both some of the most iconic moments from that game, and if Sans is too much of a spoiler, Papyrus is always another interesting option.
It'd be pretty bad PR for Microsoft to go with a character who isn't Banjo in Smash. Fans want Banjo and they've acknowledged it. Do they at this stage want to show people that they don't listen or care?At the very least we know that Phil is aware of how much the fans want Banjo in Smash. I think it would be a huge middle finger to the fans to publicly acknowledge it multiple times and talk about how cool you are with it and then proceed to not make it happen despite finally having the opportunity
Just because an older character is remembered and requested on the internet doesn't mean they were a huge deal. Look at Isaac. Or Takamaru. Kid Icarus was known, sure, but comparing its reception to Zelda or Metroid is pretty dubious.I actually remember a lot of people were requesting Pit for Melee, I remember seeing it in several magazines, like Game Informer and EGM, particular among the older crowd that grew up with the NES (which, Journalists of the time most definitely would've been), so no, I disagree with ya there, a lot of people knew who Pit was before Brawl (heck, Pit's Microgame in Wario Ware Twisted even joked about poor Kid Icarus waiting forever to get a new game, and that was prior to Brawl's announcement too). It's definitely not Sakurai bias, Kid Icarus was a big deal in its day, and the older fans of the time requested Pit a lot.
Considering all that would happen is typical Smash tantrums, I think they'll land on their feet either way.It'd be pretty bad PR for Microsoft to go with a character who isn't Banjo in Smash. Fans want Banjo and they've acknowledged it. Do they at this stage want to show people that they don't listen or care?