I'd hope so, but I wouldn't count on it. Even if they do though, it might not end up a good way, have you guys seen
's costumes?
But all the cool kids fight wearing plaid oven gloves!
The fact we didn't get a Ms. Pac-Man alt still shocks me. I GUESS it's because they wouldn't be able to edit the "pizza" form of the attacks to match but I don't think fans would be upset about that....
I went into this when the same came up in the K. Rool thread a few weeks ago (and provided citations there), but to keep it brief, this is because whilst Namco do own Ms. Pac-Man, they are required to pay royalties to General Computer Corporation every time her game, merchandise featuring her, etcetera, is released.
GCC is the company who created Crazy Otto, a Pac-Man hack which was sold to Midway (Namco's US distributor in the 1980s), who turned it into Ms. Pac-Man and eventually handed the rights to her over to Namco. Royalties from Ms. Pac-Man sales had to be paid from the off, and future court findings, made after Midway created further unauthorised sequels, also found that GCC created "the concept of a Pac-Family" and were due royalties for spin-offs and merchandise featuring Pac-Man's family as well.
This is why you don't see Ms. Pac-Man very much, and why she's not an alt for Pac-Man in Smash.
A similar situation exists with some elements from Pac-Land, too, as Namco licensed parts of Hanna-Barbera's licensed Pac-Man cartoon for that game, including the theme music and the ghost designs - that's a whole other story, though, but it's why those elements are sadly absent from Smash Wii U's Pac-Land stage.
It's pretty crazy, and would never happen in the field of video games and video game character licensing nowadays.
I would include a
at the end of my every post, but I don't because:
1. I'll forget it anyway.
2. KingShadow already does it (although he changed it to
at some point, don't know which one he is using now)
I just sign my PMs with
. I think adding it into my forum posts would make them look cluttered, seeing as I already have a signature anyway.
Question time: How likely it is that we get a RtDL style Kirby game for Wii U?
I hope we do. I don't know if we will or if they'll opt for another 3DS installment, though. I would prefer a 3DS title, to be honest.
Now the real question is, when will HAL be able to perfect a formula for Kirby to make the shift to 3D?
Even all these years on, people (actually not referring to yourself here even though I'm quoting you, Feelicks - it's just something I see all over the place and your post makes me think of it
) frequently make the mistake of thinking that "making the shift to 3D" is something that should or must be done for platformers, but it would be a poor idea for the Kirby series to have such a game in it.
3D platformers consistently sell less than 2D ones due to being less mechanically interesting and a lot more sparse, and they are by their very nature far less accessible - when accessibility is the series' entire reason for existing in the first place, it just doesn't add up.
When it does poorly, it would also end up as ammo for those who mistakenly think that that the Kirby series is small and deserves no more representation in crossovers, and it could endanger future installments as well - just look at what happens to other Nintendo series that don't sell well. Whilst Kirby is far from being in the same small-time-selling situation as Star Fox, F-Zero, Metroid, Chibi-Robo!, and so on, it would be very bad for him to end up there.
EDIT: And look what happened with Air Ride. No more Kirby racers since, putting that specific spin-off avenue into the F-Zero boat.
Id like to say, I think the best way to make Bandana Dee stand out, is to implement a true system of trajectory and force within his spear. We have no characters based on altered/calculated skill in projectiles: If his spear required the player to master its use of physics, it would not only keep the character true to himself, but take a simple concept and make it very fun; after all, Little Mac is extremely unique, and he only punches.
An "easy to pick up, difficult to master" sort of thing? It does sound fun, though it could make him a bit divisive. I like the idea, though, as that would live up to him being a character you shouldn't underestimate.
I am thinking about the idea of waddle dee being a palutena, and representing the waddle dees in general. Maybe having a bunch of waddle dee powers...
Bandana Dee a god, confirmed?
I can't believe this week will end without news.
Well, we've got virtual confirmation of more Super Mario series Amiibo via the new Mario Tennis Ultra Smash news, at least.
Honestly, Nintendo needs to cut the bull****. Iwata died. I get that. But it's been 3 months! They're keeping their fans in the dark without any information whatsoever and that's just unacceptable. Even if they just said "We're working on future content for Smash Bros." or something, I'd be fine, but they haven't even acknowledged the ballot's closing at all! It's times like this when it sucks to be a Nintendo fan.
It takes a long time to reorganise after the passing of an important person, big company or not. Don't forget, they're not a faceless entity - the company is made up of human beings.