Duff0
Smash Ace
update update update update
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No need to thank meforward is #1
List is finished.
Someones a suck up=p.No need to thank me
That was directed towards Oscar, not forwardSomeones a suck up=p.
So, do the Atomic Comic tourneys have a impact on the official rankings?
I told you that in confidence, Tai!!!!!!G-mo pretty much read out all the panelist's lists to us at Vat-zero's yesterday.
Couldnt of said it better myself.I told you that in confidence, Tai!!!!!!
You're out of the loop.
Timmy for dictator.Couldnt of said it better myself.
ps. G-mo for president
I can settle with that.Timmy for dictator.
Some characters counter others and one could have picked a counter. In a 2/3 set in the second and third games you have the opportunity to change your character.I really don't get how single matches doesn't determine anything. It just doesn't make any sense to me. I don't care if you use the Atomic tournaments in the rankings, that's all your own thing as far as I'm concerned, but I just have trouble wrapping my head around the concept of "It has to be Best 2 of 3 to count/prove something!"
However, I even made it Double Elimination and you're still telling me that it's not good enough to determine if it's result worthy? So, you're telling me that if someone loses twice in a row and is eliminated that it won't count because that person could have won if it was 2 of 3? How about just winning the first match to begin with? What happened to that?
For the record, I'm not intending to sound pissy. I'm just genuinely confused by the concept of 2 of 3 being the only "good" format.
I can understand this reason, actually.Some characters counter others and one could have picked a counter. In a 2/3 set in the second and third games you have the opportunity to change your character.
The whole reasoning behind the "best of" is to prove who is the consistent winner. Basketball playoffs are set like that to make sure there is no flukes. Anyone can beat someone else randomly, but can they do it more than once? Thats my feeling on the whole 2/3 3/5 sets.I really don't get how single matches doesn't determine anything. It just doesn't make any sense to me. I don't care if you use the Atomic tournaments in the rankings, that's all your own thing as far as I'm concerned, but I just have trouble wrapping my head around the concept of "It has to be Best 2 of 3 to count/prove something!"
However, I even made it Double Elimination and you're still telling me that it's not good enough to determine if it's result worthy? So, you're telling me that if someone loses twice in a row and is eliminated that it won't count because that person could have won if it was 2 of 3? How about just winning the first match to begin with? What happened to that?
For the record, I'm not intending to sound pissy. I'm just genuinely confused by the concept of 2 of 3 being the only "good" format.
If you're going to try and ridicule someone, you should at least learn the difference between your and you're. It's really annoying and shows a complete lack of intelligence, which makes me sad.I know why 2d is confused. Its because he's the Uber Noob!!!
Oh yeah and also Atomicmatt is a noob, just like it says under his name. It doesn't matter what you say or feel, your wrong. HAHAHA "Look at me, I'm atomic matt, I like playing one game because sets scare me"
man-up, son.