• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Are people good only when it is convenient?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Suntan Luigi

Smash Lord
Joined
May 31, 2006
Messages
1,160
Location
Bethlehem PA, Lehigh U.
"You see, their morals, their code...it's a bad joke, dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you. When the chips are down, these...These civilized people...they'll eat each other."

-Joker from the Dark Knight movie

Since I watched the Dark Knight, I wondered about whether what the Joker was saying would be true in real life. Are people willing to break their own moral codes when the going gets rough? Will normal, everyday people turn into thieves and even murderers under exceptional circumstances?

Think about if the two boat experiment actually happened in real life. What if such a situation were to occur where one boat full of civilians and another boat full of convicts were wired with explosives, and each was given the detonator to the other boat's bomb. They are told that one has to blow the other up within one hour otherwise both boats will be blown up.

In the movie of course, neither boat blows the other one up, and Batman stops the Joker. In reality, though, would this be the case? Would people really refrain from blowing each other up?


Also, from http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=105254142852644&v=info, here is a fascinating read on the Joker's thesis and how Batman's actions in the movie actually prove him to be correct.

"In the instant classic The Dark Knight, Batman and the Joker are portrayed as polar opposites. Batman does what he does out of pure altruism and the Joker does what he does to prove his thesis (and because he just enjoys it). The Joker's thesis is that people are only good when it is convenient to be. This was the main thrust of all of his actions, most notably the experiment with the two boats. Throughout the film this theme of Batman and the Joker as the complete antithesis of each other is developed. Batman's actions, however, do not bear this theme out.

Batman is portrayed as operating under the idea that doing the right thing is moral and will work all of the time. This is why he refuses to kill. This idea is in total opposition to The Joker's thesis. When push comes to shove, however, Batman tortures The Joker and wiretaps all of Gotham's citizens to get the information he needs to save Rachel and find The Joker. Whether wiretapping is wrong is too involved an issue to address here. Whether or not it is objectively immoral is immaterial for this discussion. Batman and his associates acknowledge that they believe it to be immoral. Thus, whether wiretapping is wrong or not they have done something that they believe to be wrong.

Although Batman's actions claim to be a rebuttal to The Joker's thesis, that people are only moral when it is convenient, in actuality he proves him right. As long as he is only fighting relatively mundane organized crime and petty criminals Batman is happy to stay within the limits of his code of ethics. However, when confronted with a rival able to truly challenge him he easily breaks this code to catch The Joker. The same goes for Lucius Fox. After his tirade about the immorality of Batman's wiretap imager he relents and agrees to help him use it "just one time." The Joker himself could not have asked for better proof. Gotham's most altruistic citizen is himself only moral when it is easy to be.

Another theme of The Dark Knight is the juxtaposition of Harvey Dent, as Gotham's white knight, with Batman, as Gotham's dark knight. Harvey is initially successful, working within the law he begins to make significant progress. He is haled as a hero who does not need a cowl to save Gotham. Ultimately, however, he goes insane and begins to slaughter people; first the guilty and then the innocent (who are saved by Batman's intervention).

Batman is portrayed as a less morally clear-cut figure. He bends the rules of morality and does whatever he feels is necessary to save lives. In fact, Batman and The Joker could be thought of as two sides of the same coin.

Thus, although one of the movie's major themes is that people can and will do what is right no matter what and it will turn out better than total utilitarianism, the message that is brought home by the actions of the characters is that although morality is nice, sometimes it must be circumvented in order to save the world.

The White Knight, the one who follows the rules and stays within the bounds of his morality is driven insane and becomes a murderer; The Dark Knight, the one who bends the rules and steps outside of his ethics whenever he sees fit becomes the true hero who shoulders the burden of The White Knight's crimes.

The Joker must be laughing in his cell."
 

#HBC | Acrostic

♖♘♗♔♕♗♘♖
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
2,452
Facebook said:
In the instant classic The Dark Knight, Batman and the Joker are portrayed as polar opposites. Batman does what he does out of pure altruism and the Joker does what he does to prove his thesis (and because he just enjoys it).
Batman acts as a vigilante because he was traumatized as a child when it came to his own parents dying at the hands of mobsters. Him chasing after criminals is his form of dealing with his own trauma and inserting his own brand of justice where the law has fallen short.

Facebook said:
Batman is portrayed as operating under the idea that doing the right thing is moral and will work all of the time.
Batman doesn't believe in "doing the right thing", he believes in getting things done. He's a vigilante which is an intrinsically flawed hero. In the movie he blatantly ignores the Joker's discourse as he prioritizes saving Harvey and Rachel.

Facebook said:
This is why he refuses to kill.
Batman refuses to kill because his parents were killed were mobsters. The trauma was deeply cemented in his mind and is what transformed him into the Batman. This idea is not painted as a moral choice, it is more of a man distancing himself from becoming a murderer.
 

Suntan Luigi

Smash Lord
Joined
May 31, 2006
Messages
1,160
Location
Bethlehem PA, Lehigh U.
Ok, it sounds like you understood the movie well, but what do you think about the actual question of the debate?

Are people good only when it is convenient?

My take on this is yes, most people are like this. It's easy to follow a moral code if you are not under stress. But when it really comes down to it I believe most people would sacrifice their morals if they thought it would be necessary to save their own skin or to accomplish something that they felt was very important. I think if the two boat experiment were executed in real life many people on the civilian boat would think it ok to blow up the convicts and so they would proceed to do just that.

That would be more than a little ironic I think, if the civilians blew up the criminals first.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2008
Messages
8,905
Location
Vinyl Scratch's Party Bungalo
NNID
Budget_Player
Altruism is a good trait for a social species to have, when seen from an evolutionary perspective. What it isn't is the be-all, end-all – being a ****, while harmful, can sometimes ensure that your lineage continues (case in point: ****). We're hardwired to appreciate altruism, not hardwired to be altruistic all the time. So from the perspective of scientific/evolutionary morality, then clearly the answer is yes.

From an inductive standpoint... Dear god yes. The examples of people who, under severe pressure, have kept their morals and their high ground is astounding mostly because it's so damn short.

I don't really know from what other standpoints you could attack this issue...
 

Dre89

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
6,158
Location
Australia
NNID
Dre4789
BPC- I guess in your induction you excluded the thousands of Christian martyrs. That's some pretty moral sh** if you ask me.

:phone:
 

Dre89

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
6,158
Location
Australia
NNID
Dre4789
I guess then you didn't include yourself in the induction then.

Smashes him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom