Jacobcc
Smash Journeyman
So, after this game does anyone think Brawl will be the last page of the book?
because there was a huge gap from melee to brawl (7 years)..
because there was a huge gap from melee to brawl (7 years)..
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I hope that was a Joke, that is like asking "Will there ever be a Halo for PS3", There seperate componies, they will never make an SSB PS3.do you think there will be a SSB for PS3?
BTW, i don't think it will be the last SSB..i was just asking for everyones oppinons
Unless it will evolve in a no-more-just-Nintendo-chars game.And why the hell would you guys think this game would go multiplatform!? A Nintendo game will NEVER be on another platform except a Nintendo platform. 'Nough said...
making 4 or 5 more would be excessive, at that point it's not about sales anymore it's about the credibility of the company. The only series that has pulled off that number of sequels and still staying good is final fantasy.Smash is way too profitable for nintendo.
It would be silly to not make another like 4 or 5 smash bros, they just make way too much money.
Are you serious? C'mon, man. The PS3 is Sony's console. What would Nintendo stand to gain by releasing a game like Smash bros. for one of their COMPETITORS? I hate it when people say things like this.do you think there will be a SSB for PS3?
BTW, i don't think it will be the last SSB..i was just asking for everyones oppinons
Mario? Zelda? There have been 7/8 at least for those, too.The only series that has pulled off that number of sequels and still staying good is final fantasy.
Who says Smash can't have have more than 5 installments? As long as they wait a while in between, like say a few years, and they epically improve each Smash game like they have so far, Smash could go on for decades just like Final Fantasy or Zelda.making 4 or 5 more would be excessive, at that point it's not about sales anymore it's about the credibility of the company. The only series that has pulled off that number of sequels and still staying good is final fantasy.
Also lets remmber that just because it's Smash doesn't mean it's good. It could be that the next one will be bad enough that people won't but it enough fro the company to take the risk of a loss on the next game after that.
So overall, since it's so successful they'll still making them but once it ges stale or sales drop they'll probably stop.
But that's the thing you can't epicly improve every game. After a while it's still gonna be just the same old smash which isn't bad for us competetive players but for the casual why would they buy the same game over and over?Who says Smash can't have have more than 5 installments? As long as they wait a while in between, like say a few years, and they epically improve each Smash game like they have so far, Smash could go on for decades just like Final Fantasy or Zelda.
1. There are plenty of games out there that have mediocre improvements year after year and still sell pretty well. (See: Madden, FIFA, College Football games...) Other series such as Unreal and Soul Calibur/Edge release new games every few years or so and both of those series are still pretty popular. (Soul Calibur Legends never happened)But that's the thing you can't epicly improve every game. After a while it's still gonna be just the same old smash which isn't bad for us competetive players but for the casual why would they buy the same game over and over?
But if smash is as successful as Final Fantasy(which so far I don't think it is) then maybe having 6-7 games would be justified but I doubt that something that's so similar will continue that long. Also FF has a story which makes it so it can be new everytime if they just give it a new story but Smash although it does have a weak story with SSE can't exactly make it so it's new with the story.
But, the question remains, how would he fair directing a fighting game? Miyamoto is more of the guy that directs his own creations. He's imaginative and the guy behind Nintendo's success. He basically gave Zelda to Eiji Aonuma (though he still oversees it) and his latest work is Wii Fit. I don't think he'd fair with SSB too well, especially, since he probably wasn't that much involved with the first two much less, the third.Miyamoto could take over as the head developer if they make a 4th game..
And if they bring back the same team that made Brawl a sequel would turn out fine.
I don't think Sakurai wants to retire, he left HAL because he was tired of making sequels. I'd say he wants to make original game without anyone telling him whate to do, like at HAl were he was jsut making endless Kirby sequels. Hence why he founded Sora, to make his own game.But, the question remains, how would he fair directing a fighting game? Miyamoto is more of the guy that directs his own creations. He's imaginative and the guy behind Nintendo's success. He basically gave Zelda to Eiji Aonuma (though he still oversees it) and his latest work is Wii Fit. I don't think he'd fair with SSB too well, especially, since he probably wasn't that much involved with the first two much less, the third.
Honestly? This is the last one that has Sakurai's name in the credits. Seriously, it's all in color. Sakurai didn't know about there being a new SSB when it was announced back in E3 '05, in fact, Nintendo asked him on the spot on that day to develop Brawl. It sounded to me as though Sakurai doesn't want to continue to make games. It's like he wants to retire but he can't because of how many people need him.
The pure and simple fact is that Sakurai will be done with Smash after this. There's nothing more he could possibly add to this franchise that he hasn't already, they really have thought of everything. If they knew they were going to make a fourth one, they wouldn't put so much into Brawl. Hell, we probably wouldn't even have Stage Builder.
The guy isn't going to continue the franchise and the most Nintendo could do is add characters and stages, that's it. That's what they were going to do with the new Smash if Sakurai didn't direct the game. Yes folks, it was going to be Melee with new characters, stages, and online. Would you have liked that? Not me.
I would only want the series to continue if it had a valid reason to and if the person behind the last three games was in the development team. If Sakurai didn't make it, likely, it won't turn out good. But, we'll have to wait and see what happens 7+ years from now because Brawl will keep us busy for a lifetime, that I guarantee.
Yes, I sound sure of myself because of Nintendo's doubt in their ability to create a new Smash without Sakurai. That's what they intended to do if Sakurai wouldn't develop Brawl, create Melee+, an expansion pak if you will. Oh, and improved graphics of course.
I fully agree with you. I honestly think that sakurai did all of this (SSE, stage builder, online mode, etc, etc, etc) to make sure that there won't be a better smash than this one and, therefore, end the smash saga. we have to admit it, sakurai decided to develop this game to keep our mouths shut and our hands busy for the rest of our livesBut, the question remains, how would he fair directing a fighting game? Miyamoto is more of the guy that directs his own creations. He's imaginative and the guy behind Nintendo's success. He basically gave Zelda to Eiji Aonuma (though he still oversees it) and his latest work is Wii Fit. I don't think he'd fair with SSB too well, especially, since he probably wasn't that much involved with the first two much less, the third.
Honestly? This is the last one that has Sakurai's name in the credits. Seriously, it's all in color. Sakurai didn't know about there being a new SSB when it was announced back in E3 '05, in fact, Nintendo asked him on the spot on that day to develop Brawl. It sounded to me as though Sakurai doesn't want to continue to make games. It's like he wants to retire but he can't because of how many people need him.
The pure and simple fact is that Sakurai will be done with Smash after this. There's nothing more he could possibly add to this franchise that he hasn't already, they really have thought of everything. If they knew they were going to make a fourth one, they wouldn't put so much into Brawl. Hell, we probably wouldn't even have Stage Builder.
The guy isn't going to continue the franchise and the most Nintendo could do is add characters and stages, that's it. That's what they were going to do with the new Smash if Sakurai didn't direct the game. Yes folks, it was going to be Melee with new characters, stages, and online. Would you have liked that? Not me.
I would only want the series to continue if it had a valid reason to and if the person behind the last three games was in the development team. If Sakurai didn't make it, likely, it won't turn out good. But, we'll have to wait and see what happens 7+ years from now because Brawl will keep us busy for a lifetime, that I guarantee.
Yes, I sound sure of myself because of Nintendo's doubt in their ability to create a new Smash without Sakurai. That's what they intended to do if Sakurai wouldn't develop Brawl, create Melee+, an expansion pak if you will. Oh, and improved graphics of course.