Recent content by Superbus

Because I am adhering to my religion. No, there is no logical concrete 100% proof, thus you don't believe. I had a personal experience earlier in my life (my family should ALL [immediate and most of the extended] be dead), ergo i believe. Yes because I am exactly like you...

How about I don't commit the first sin because I believe I am doing right?

It's not an avoidance. You're asking about a situation that isn't going to happen, thus is irrelevant. I don't even know what I am, because abandoning God is the first and foremost sin in our religion, and that's why I'm not going to abandon God.

Ok, the fear thing is ridiculous. I am honest, and your question is silly because I am not going to abandon God. But to answer a better version of your question, is that why I stay Christian? No. You've made Christianity out to be worse than racism. At least people gather a feeling of...

And most people are republican because there parents are republican, and most people are racist because there parents are racist... So, what's your point? It is a known fact that your environment (meaning parents) are going to influence how you turn out. I'm not seeing what makes this...

Now, I don't want to debate the semantics of the word bull****... B - What you said validates my point. When I entered the topic, people were claiming to disprove God. As you said, you can't disprove or prove God.

But what if one is right? Also, it if by irrational, you mean believing in something that there is not CONCRETE evidence for, then what is wrong with that? You've just explained one of the tenets of our religion, which is semi-blind faith.

The Chao egg hits me and breaks. Poor baby Chao. I then make the broken egg shell into a sharp object and chuck it at the next poster

Yes, those are the only things it does... Don't be silly and make stupid blanket statements like that. Spelling errors in red. Grammar errors in blue. Now, as for your arguments. Each side has agreed that it is impossible to prove/disprove God, so the debate is centered really on...

How about, instead of patronizing me, you open your eyes in look. If you would have seen some my posts, you would know I am a very religously compromising individual. Omnipotence, however, is something I will not compromise on. All powerful means all powerful. And part of that implies the...

Oh so all those, "God is bull****" statements were sarcastic... And if you aren't trying to convert us to your side, which would involve disproving God, then what are you doing? This is a debate.

I believe that the war with Iraq is just. I believe God is omnipotent. They are opinion because they cannot be concretly proved or disproved. Logic normally holds, but this is a special circumstance. I would much rather get back to other theistic issues, because as I said, THIS is...

Oblivious to sarcasm. So you want me to use someone else's opinions do disprove mine? Descartes is still a a great thinker, but our coinciding theories do not mean that we are right. The point is that my belief is not untenetable. Besides, people are going to look back on our...

Cogito ergo sum. ^Sounds good to me. Just because Descartes is dead doesn't mean that he is wrong. His school of thought wasn't thrown down the toilet. No one can disprove what he said. Using logic to prove that God cannot violate logic is downright absurd. The matter is opinion really.

Yes, but I cannot violate logic. As I just found out, I follow the Cartesian school of thought, which stipulates that God can do anything, even the impossible.