Recent content by PeterJude

It also suggests that people shouldn't wear clothing of mixed threads or eat figs. It also suggests that "Chariots of Iron" are enough to subvert God's divine will. It has numerous sexist remarks and is a loose inconsistent collection of texts in general. Understanding it requires that you...

Poor Sonic. If only SEGA actually treated him as prized IP rather than something to stick on any ol' rubbish to get it to sell.

The point Toon Link supporters should have given up.

They're making DLC, it's about what's going to move the most units. If they get 40,000 votes saying: "PINK GOLD PAECH FOR SMASH lolol!!!11!!!1! #SM4SHBROZ!" and one masterpiece of our time making a passionate case for Viridi, who do you think's getting an October release? It's going to be about...

To be honest, with them working on DLC, I'd expect there are a few working on the Ice Climbers still, trying to find a way to make them work in the hardware limitations. I doubt they'd go for having only Popo, as they seem to be perfectionists about it, but you never know. Leaving them on the...

I honestly wouldn't rule someone like Crash out. But there is a secondary issue to consider. How are they going to licence him, and is there enough demand for him that he would cover those costs as a DLC character?

Fair enough, hopefully my and others thoughts on the matter of characters who have been "disconfirmed" are taken into account in any decisions made in the near future though. In any case, have a nice day.

This is the thing, I think someone has tapped on someones shoulder here. To be completely honest I think we'll see at least one "deconfirmed character" released as DLC, and just like every other game that has gone through this, it'll seem so irrelevant once they've done it once. The big...

Fair enough. Again, my own issue is with the logic used. I can understand requiring "it be Nintendo related", even if it's only tenuous. I can understand getting rid of thread for very popular characters (i.e. Ridley, K Rool, etc.) from this section to make it easier to deal with (but K. Rool...

So if social groups are good enough "for them", then why even have any character threads in here at all? It should be all or none, it just seems arbitrary to rule some characters out. You do point out the moderation issues though. If the issue is that you (as a team) don't want to deal with a...

I don't really think saying "they should have some connection to Nintendo" is exactly a bold statement. I doubt Nintendo are going to go out and licence Bill Gates for the game, as there's no possible benefit to them in doing so. However, you need to make some quite major assumptions to rule...

Yes, but why is that "the standard"? You just can't shout "the standard" and move on with your day, a standard has to be based on something. Why are certain characters banned from discussion: "Our standard" Why are certain characters allowed: "Our standard" Why is that the standard: *crickets*

I think that you could self consistently deduce that it will be limited to characters that have appeared on a Nintendo console as a video game character. But you can't rule out otherwise valid characters at this point. Whether or not Nintendo could licence a character to get them in is an...

Ridley, Snake and K Rool, because they were the most deserving not in. We'll see what happens.

The straw grabbing in this case is ruling anyone out. You can decide upon a stand based on circular logic, yes. Why have any "Character for DLC" threads open at all in this section then?