Eggm
Smash Hero
Thats too much work for the panelists IMO.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
True! But without dave, zang, comp on the list, the gap is still rather massive. As m2k is number 1 in the country, compared to reik being like 8th-ish in tristate.I would say the "MASSIVE SKILL GAP" is unnecessary because if we are basing this of skill than the order would be different. >_>
I think we should wait.-Reik, should the list be added to the front page yet, or should we wait until after WoZ and Triad give their input?
The point of the NJ rankings is to order the NJ players. How can we compare players if they're not competing the same events?I don't think that people who compete in a state should be counted in that state. This means that people like Magus shouldn't even be on the NJ list(sorry -_-). As much as a like Magus, it really isn't fair to make the exception.
You use tourney's to simply understand the level of skill of a person. This list shouldn't be about what tourney you compete in. If M2k stopped competing in NJ, would we take him off our list just cuz he competes nationally? Who's list would he belong on, if not ours? I say the rankings are simply done by state residence as a way of organizing the country so that all players can be ranked locally. But its not about what tourney's you go to. I know cat3 was taken into account for the rankings- that wasn't an NJ tourney.
I'm totally in favor of this, or at least something similar to this.Rules should be defined and completely objective. (examples) If you have not competed in ANY tournaments in 3 months, you are removed from the list, no exceptions. If you haven't competed since the last list was made, you will be lowered under those who have a similar skill level and are more active, by default. Only NJ tourney's are counted for the rankings -or- all tourneys NJ players compete in are counted toward the rankings. NJ players only -or- anyone who competes in NJ frequently. (frequently is defined as at least one tourney a month in NJ)
Yeah, Zang was iffy. I wanted to put him back on, but if he said he's not going to be participating in NJ for a while, and Smashtality is the only thing he's entered, does that justify putting him on? I don't know what we should do.Zang plays, and is better than Reik/inui. Put him at two. He was at smashtality.
Lol I just put that in as a joke since the list hasn't had final approval yet. Don't take it seriously, guys.I would say the "MASSIVE SKILL GAP" is unnecessary because if we are basing this of skill than the order would be different. >_>
Isn't this doing exactly what you just said not to do?My God, it's a mess in here.
Let me make things clear. The panelists have to come up with a criteria for placing people in the list. Do NOT make up your own rules or assume or make any exceptions. You take the criteria, you check the players who qualify and can even be on the list based on the criteria, and you can then discuss what order the players should be in. Everyone in the panel will follow this criteria and will defend their arguments through panel discussion based on this criteria.
Those who aren't in the panel, please don't pressure the panelists. They have been accepted and chosen to do this for you. If you want to act like a panelist, step it up for the next list - I hate that people avoid it when registration for the panel begins, but then everyone jumps the wagon and barks orders on how the list should be done. In the end, only the panelists chosen have the right to place where players are. That's final.
One piece of advice - Zang should be at the list, if not the bottom where possible. Every significant event should be accounted for, and if Zanguzen placed well in what is considered a big tournament in the state, then that merits him a spot on the list, even if it has to be lower than usual. You do NOT make exceptions - we look at what has happened recently, not what you assume is going to happen in the future. Any substantial events from the last list until the new list should be analyzed with the utmost scrutiny. If Zang doesn't participate in any other events by the time you make another list after this one, you can take him off.
That'll be my last input on that matter. I trust that the rest of the panelists will do their job. If things get chaotic, I will do what is necessary to put things back in order.
No, I do not intend to be a panelist, but I will moderate the process if i have to - don't forget that this is why Tope and I were chosen to be moderators in the first place.
Edit - I suggest the panelists no longer publicly discuss the list past updates on how far you've gone to complete the list. If you have any problems, I'd rather you send Tope or myself and PM and we'll be happy to assist you. Otherwise, find a place where you can discuss these matters amongst yourselves. Everyone else in NJ will have a chance to voice an opinion AFTER the list is finished, in which case the panel should be ready to defend their positions.
Well uhh.... Okay then. Well said, indeed. ^_^DMBrandon, one of my duties as a moderator in the regional forums is to look over state and regional rankings and make sure the process runs smoothly. I do so enough for the entire Region and watching over the 9 panelists in charge of that, and I have the same duty to do so for every state that has a state list. Please bear that in mind for the future - this is the reason WHY I'm here.
I'm so flattered. Really, this means a lot that you would even say that.If it were up to me, I'd nominate JFox for the position. He's one of the main people already in charge of the NJPlayerFinder, and I think it's appropriate if he were to be chosen for this position.
Eh, maybe.
Maybe @ you being overseer or w/e.What does that mean?
All hail Lord Inui's sensitive decree! He took the feelings of a mere commoner into account!Maybe @ you being overseer or w/e.