mario15
Smash Cadet
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2010
- Messages
- 52
- NNID
- kylemshipley
- 3DS FC
- 3351-4555-2812
Recently I've noticed that there are polarizing views within the competitive community of Smash about tier lists. Most people stand by them, and will dedicate their time to playing a character simply because they're the top tier, others hate the idea of tiers and will play as characters, regardless of their ranking in the tier lists. While I do think that some characters have a higher advantage against others, I don't think that anyone should feel pressured to stay away from a character just because they're near the bottom of the tier list. I don't think tier lists can fully gauge the potential of a character, rather, they tell you which characters are most likely to win. Look, I'm no smash pro by any stretch of the imagination, but I've been playing these games since the first one came out in 1999, so I think I'm at least competent, and I find that I tend to do well with characters who are near the bottom, as well as those who are near the top. My mains in wii U are Mario, Little Mac, Link, Ganondorf, Ike, Marth, and Shulk. What do you guys think? How do you feel about tiers?
Last edited: