Wow, really? I better go find my old ROB toy then, I didn't know it was designed to shoot lasers and fly around. Would have played with that thing way more as a kid had I known...
Aside from the fact this is
clear strawman due to failing to grasp the main point, let me show you something.
This is a R.O.B.:
This is Smash Bros.' R.O.B.:
Outside of additional points of articulation (which isn't a
balance change), there is no drastic change to the design.
And before you even think about pointing out the "hands", those pads are what you put on a R.O.B. to play Stack-Up.
Try again.
The modding community says otherwise, actually.
And there's little difference between a 12 foot tall Ridley and a 8 foot tall one, unless 4 feet is suddenly a massive difference for Ridley.
If Bowser can be 12 feet and shrunk to 7, then why is Ridley suddenly unable to be? As long as he's proportionate, he'll look fine as long as he's one of the largest characters in the game.
"The modding community says otherwise"?
You do realize the only one to make a successful PSA
altered his design to work around the game, right? He didn't literally just take his Other M model, slap a moveset on him and call it a day.
It's more than just his overall size that was the issue. If it was
JUST a drop in size, there would be no issue (i.e. Ganondorf, Palutena, Charizard relative to Pikachu, etc.). It's working Ridley's design to make him a balanced fighter, which decreasing his body size is only a small part of.
Aside from that, despite me advocating Bowser as a prime example in favor of Ridley support in the early days of Smash 4 speculation, I've come to realize that Bowser is a
bad example compared to the above listed.
Why? Because Bowser fluctuates in size
based on his role. If he's part of the competition, he's roughly at the same size difference to Mario as he is in Smash (where he's, shocker, part of the competition).
(Taken from an official size chart)
If he's an antagonistic force to face off against in a heated boss battle or just there to ruin the player's day, he's naturally larger.
Again, not saying that Ridley can't be scaled down. I'm only saying that Bowser is not as good as an example as it was once believed.
Ganondorf is.
Seriously. This was how tall he was compared to Link in Twilight Princess. Link is
not eye level with Ganondorf's crotch in Smash.
Though outside of body size, nothing needed to be changed about Ganondorf's design to make him work.
I don't see why the principle of accuracy is different between the two examples, even though the specific details aren't the same. The King of Evil being a clunking old fart should be as egregious, if not moreso than the Cunning God of Death being a slightly-less-big big character to anyone who proportedly cares about "the correct way" to represent characters.
And before the typical Falcondorf rationales come up from his mains, if "slow, strong and using purple sparkles" counts as in-character for Ganondorf, far more could be excused for Ridley than a slight Smash redesign.
Because it's in
different contexts.
Sakurai is referring to the character's design in terms of balance (i.e. giving Ridley small wings and a smaller body range (which would include things like his as-long-as-he-is-tall tail) to decrease his hitbox and lower his hypothetically ridiculous range, making him flightless/heavily restricting his flight to balance out a size/range/defense advantage, etc.).
Using "MUH FALCONDORF" as an excuse is focusing on how the character
fights, which is comparing apples to oranges.
And honestly, people wouldn't be complaining so much about Ganondorf if his moves didn't have some derivative of Captain Falcon. I mean really, "clunking old fart"
pretty much describes Ganondorf in Twilight Princess (where his design comes from). The only difference is he's a "clunking old fart that fights with a sword he hates" in TP. And if that's what he was in Smash instead of "clunking old Captain Falcon derivative", no one would give a damn about him being "clunking old
anything".
You three seem so eager to attack me for being a too bigot who
dares to say anything you don't want to hear.
Let me make it clear that I feel Sakurai should have just bit the bullet and worked Ridley as a character
regardless of what changes would have to be made (barring the concept of hairy lizard teenage Ridley; that's one option I'm sure would be less favorable than no Ridley at all), even if it means
re-inventing Ridley like what the MvC games did with Sentinel with a newer workable design that resembles previous ones instead of using/altering them.
Such as this:
That being said, I find Sakurai's viewpoint on the subject to be understandable and am not willing to ***** and whine and make poor excuses as to why he's a moronic hypocrite over it.