Your thoughts on the "Competitive" community

[Collective of Bears]

Fox and Falco. Tiers. No items or FSs. Final Destination and Battlefield. No gimmicks. No FUN. This is what I think of the "Competitive" circuit. They believe that all items, FSs, and slightly tricky stages are "cheap." Well, isn't the ultimate of the game mastering everything and everyone? Yes, it is. And how do you do that being limited to just a few characters, two stages, and no items? And more importantly, where is the FUN in that? Isn't the point of a video game to have FUN? Yes, it is. And with all the new additions and changes being made in Brawl, the "Competitive" community should learn how to get along and play with some strange characters and stages and items and learn why they were put there. FUN. I've said my piece, now I want to know your thoughts on the "Competitive" players and system.

 

[Peter_Parker]

Oh, they ARE having fun.

Leave 'em alone.

 

[Youko]

...Um, let's put it this way. To save all the flaming that is bound to occur this discussion, I IMPLORE you to read the other threads that exist on the casual/competitive perspective.

 

[blayde_axel]

lol. Stereotypes and generalizations are fun.

 

[E.G.G.M.A.N.]

I can't think of one person who actually plays like that. I suggest you talk to someone who attends tournaments and find out what it's REALLY like. But in responseto your thoughts, your definition of fun is not the same as as everyone elses. Do not be so quick to judge.

 

[Youko]

Yeah, basically, just because it's not "fun" for you doesn't mean it isn't "fun" for other people. For the record, you come off as sounding very naive.