Nino Rybicki
Smash Cadet
What is your opinion on licensed games? Do you think they're always bad, or they can possibly be good?
I kinda have mixed feelings towards licensed games. There's some that I think are pretty good, like the recent South Park game, the Hamtaro games for the GBC and GBA, The Simpsons Game (one of my faves), and I guess Kingdom Hearts could sorta qualify due to the use of Disney characters. But it seems that for every good licensed game, there's at least five bad ones. A lot of the older ones especially fit the bill, but plenty of recent ones do too. In fact, I've had the misfortune of playing a few really bad ones, such as the SNES Lord of the Rings game (I kid you not when I say this: you can play as Legolas, but he cannot attack - kinda sucks since he's supposed to be a badass archer), the game based on Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland, the Rambo video game, the Muppets NES game (a friend downloaded a ROM for it, which I played, and it's terrible), the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory game (my sister, a huge Tim Burton fan, got it, and she hated it almost as much as I did), and Hotel Mario (technically counts as one since Nintendo didn't make it - the only good thing about it is those so-bad-it's-good cutscenes).
Licensed games have had a pretty bad history. After all, Atari's infamous E.T. game was probably the one to start it. Not surprisingly, it kinda parallels the idea that movies based on video games tend to be awful (which is sadly true). I'm wondering if you guys have played any licensed games, which ones you've played, and how good or bad they were.
OPTIONAL QUESTIONS
1. What are the best licensed games you've played?
2. What are the worst licensed games you've played?
I kinda have mixed feelings towards licensed games. There's some that I think are pretty good, like the recent South Park game, the Hamtaro games for the GBC and GBA, The Simpsons Game (one of my faves), and I guess Kingdom Hearts could sorta qualify due to the use of Disney characters. But it seems that for every good licensed game, there's at least five bad ones. A lot of the older ones especially fit the bill, but plenty of recent ones do too. In fact, I've had the misfortune of playing a few really bad ones, such as the SNES Lord of the Rings game (I kid you not when I say this: you can play as Legolas, but he cannot attack - kinda sucks since he's supposed to be a badass archer), the game based on Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland, the Rambo video game, the Muppets NES game (a friend downloaded a ROM for it, which I played, and it's terrible), the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory game (my sister, a huge Tim Burton fan, got it, and she hated it almost as much as I did), and Hotel Mario (technically counts as one since Nintendo didn't make it - the only good thing about it is those so-bad-it's-good cutscenes).
Licensed games have had a pretty bad history. After all, Atari's infamous E.T. game was probably the one to start it. Not surprisingly, it kinda parallels the idea that movies based on video games tend to be awful (which is sadly true). I'm wondering if you guys have played any licensed games, which ones you've played, and how good or bad they were.
OPTIONAL QUESTIONS
1. What are the best licensed games you've played?
2. What are the worst licensed games you've played?
Last edited: