• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Would the PMBR Care if a Character is Dominating in Doubles?

Girth94

Smash Cadet
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
40
Location
Miami, FL
In a magical world where the cast is completely balanced (or maybe not even then), would the PMBR go out of their way to tweak a character who excels in doubles? Why or why not? I've seen that some characters do MUCH better in doubles than singles and was simply wondering.
 

Star ☆

No Problem!
Joined
Sep 18, 2013
Messages
816
Location
Sydney, Australia
NNID
Autumnflow
I'm not sure about the whole balancing perspective of it but if a character was nerfed so it would perform averagely in doubles it could butcher the singles potential of said character. It's all about compensation I think.
 

Burnsy

Smash Lord
Joined
Nov 4, 2012
Messages
1,167
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I could be wrong, but I remember reading somewhere that the game has been balanced around 1v1.
 

Strong Badam

Super Elite
Administrator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
26,545
We'd probably cross that bridge if we come to it. I've personally never considered that possibility and I kind of doubt it, but yeah.
 

DrinkingFood

Smash Hero
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
5,600
Location
Beaumont, TX
I'm sure PMBR would have the cunning to tweak a character in such a way that it affects their doubles game by drastically more than their singles game.
If Jiggs rest isn't silly in a scenario where one player can hold the opponent in place to get rested, then I don't know what would be. Granted, Rest is already a silly move, but you don't really see people complaining about rest in doubles, they just kind of accept that shenanigans come with the territory of 4 players on a stage and the possibility of 2v1 situations.
 
Top Bottom