Why Is Master Chief so bad again? *NOT A SUPPORT THREAD*

[bivunit94]

Ok. I'm not saying I want Master Chief in Brawl, or even that he even could/would be in Brawl. And yes, i know, it won't happen, because he's owned by Microsoft, but why would it be so bad if somehow he did get in Brawl? I don't think he'd be THAT bad...
Please don't hurt me...

 

[Smooth Criminal]

* Fires up the five-alarm sirens.*

Incoming!

Smooth Criminal

 

[Meta_Owns_Ur_Dad]

He would be outta place and cant use his guns so he has no moves, plus his chance is 0 because that he didnt originate from Nintendo.

 

[Rakuen]

If he by some amazing chance got in, he'd be another sword character (energy sword, remember?), and odds are we're going to have a bunch of those already.

 

[Destruction_King]

I'll give you a list.

1. Because he's owned by Bungie, a second party company to Microsoft which means he'll ONLY appear on a Microsoft console. Even if Microsoft allowed Nintendo to use him for Brawl (which they won't) Nintendo wouldn't put him in Brawl since it would basically be an advertisement to the XBox, Nintendo's direct competitor.

2. Guns are a big no no in Brawl. Despite Solid Snake barely sneaking past this rule (no pun intended,) the developers discourage the use of realistic guns in the game. Which MC relies on heavily.

3. Samus is already in the game. There's no need for two heavily armored battle tanks in the game.

4. Do we really need Halo Fanboys to get into Brawl?