• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Why are event tournaments so. Friggin. Lame. Seriously.

Spiny Top

Smash Cadet
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
49
What’s the deal with event tournaments anyways, why are they so bad?

Take the latest example- Kirby vs DK series. LITERALLY ALL IT IS is the usual 4 player smash tournament, but you are limited to a Kirby or DK series character, on a Kirby or DK stage. WHOOP DEE DO! WHO CARES. There is no Kirby “vs” DK , the tournament should be called Kirby AND DK characters only but otherwise the usual crud.

Who thinks up these tournaments? Nintendo needs to fire whoever it is. Right off the top of my head I can think of something way more interesting- squaring off squads of three Kirby players vs three DK players on big battle field. The winning squad would then advance to semi finals or straight to finals depending on player pool. At that point you might play a Kirby vs Kirby or DK vs DK, depending on who won round 1.

Or have round 1 be a DK vs DK on one side (west side) and Kirby squads on the east, where the best DK and Kibys clash for the crown.

You see that would actually be interesting and fun. Is that too much to ask, Nintendo?
 
Last edited:

meleebrawler

Smash Hero
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
8,158
Location
Canada, Quebec
NNID
meleebrawler
3DS FC
2535-3888-1548
What’s the deal with event tournaments anyways, why are they so bad?

Take the latest example- Kirby vs DK series. LITERALLY ALL IT IS is the usual 4 player smash tournament, but you are limited to a Kirby or DK series character, on a Kirby or DK stage. WHOOP DEE DO! WHO CARES. There is no Kirby “vs” DK , the tournament should be called Kirby AND DK characters only but otherwise the usual crud.

Who thinks up these tournaments? Nintendo needs to fire whoever it is. Right off the top of my head I can think of something way more interesting- squaring off squads of three Kirby players vs three DK players on big battle field. The winning squad would then advance to semi finals or straight to finals depending on player pool. At that point you might play a Kirby vs Kirby or DK vs DK, depending on who won round 1.

Or have round 1 be a DK vs DK on one side (west side) and Kirby squads on the east, where the best DK and Kibys clash for the crown.

You see that would actually be interesting and fun. Is that too much to ask, Nintendo?
The waiting times would be unbearable with such a rigid and prone-to-error or failure matchmaking structure. You'd need to provide some serious incentives for players to put up with that and a small roster selection they may not normally care for... which then brings up the concern of accusations that Nintendo is locking exclusive benefits behind a paywall.

Also not keen on working with others when the average skill of players there is far lower than anyone you'd meet around here.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom