Hi, i hope it wasnt discussed before but i had some thoughts about Sheik.
My thought is: Zero Suit Samus isnt a character which actually was in a game.
Sure she IS Samus but she was never playable as Zero Suit Samus (correct me if wrong).
Nonetheless she was added as a Newcomer in Brawl.
Hence i would say there is a concern from developer side to add characters which are actually there but not "filled with life".
Refering to my example: Zero Suit Samus is truly a character in ealier games but not one which was mentioned or descriped more detailed. However she is a newcomer in brawl.
Concerning sheik is this as follows:
Sheik is a character which didnt played a large role in the Zelda series.
She wasnt characterized good through the Zelda games :D
But she was characterized by melee.
And this is my point, she is now a complete Nintendo character through melee.
And because there is much more work involved to develop an character than deleting/skiping it, it would be unlogical to do so with Sheik.
Thus i would guess as Zamus is in, so Sheik will be too.
This thread was a reaction on the frequent estimation Sheik wouldnt be in brawl.
I think there are more reasons which speak for her being in than being not in.
What do you think about Sheik or characters which are mainly characterized through melee?
Arent the same points suggesting G&W will be in too?
My thought is: Zero Suit Samus isnt a character which actually was in a game.
Sure she IS Samus but she was never playable as Zero Suit Samus (correct me if wrong).
Nonetheless she was added as a Newcomer in Brawl.
Hence i would say there is a concern from developer side to add characters which are actually there but not "filled with life".
Refering to my example: Zero Suit Samus is truly a character in ealier games but not one which was mentioned or descriped more detailed. However she is a newcomer in brawl.
Concerning sheik is this as follows:
Sheik is a character which didnt played a large role in the Zelda series.
She wasnt characterized good through the Zelda games :D
But she was characterized by melee.
And this is my point, she is now a complete Nintendo character through melee.
And because there is much more work involved to develop an character than deleting/skiping it, it would be unlogical to do so with Sheik.
Thus i would guess as Zamus is in, so Sheik will be too.
This thread was a reaction on the frequent estimation Sheik wouldnt be in brawl.
I think there are more reasons which speak for her being in than being not in.
What do you think about Sheik or characters which are mainly characterized through melee?
Arent the same points suggesting G&W will be in too?
)