• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Signature Battle

Conker315

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
1,138
Location
Houston, TX
Alright, so I got challenged from this guy, so we decided to do a battle.
Here are our entry's, the deadline was yesterday and the Theme was haruhi.


Zero's sig:



Conkers sig:


It's open voting and voting ends on Friday.
Please give a good explanation why you voted for the signature you choose, and dont just say "Oh, I like it because of the colors or because I like that character."
Please give specific details on why you picked that signature.

Ok then go.



P.S. I hate my text =]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


EDIT: Apperantly Zero has given up, and he doesn't want the voting to continue on.
Thanks for your votes people.
BW's made me laugh.
 

The Dinkoman

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
1,277
Location
Back!
Oh GOD! Not one of these again...

I vote for Conkerrrrrrrr.

His sig is elaborate and his background is phenomenal. There's flow. good lighting. "good" i guess you could say text. And in Zero's, there's to bright lighting to much smudging. And the curved lines on the Left side of the sig take away from the focal point.

Conkerrrrrrs: 9/10

Zero's: 6/10

Why can't anyone just use the critique topic about this? Its easy you just put the sig down, ask people to rate it, put the other sig down, ask people to rate it then you PM the person the results. So I find these threads completely useless...
 

Black Waltz

Smash Champion
Joined
Jan 27, 2007
Messages
2,243
LOLOOLOLOL, first guy's sig sucks monkey balls: ****ty render quality, ****ty colors, ****ty text, meh lighting.

conker's: meh colors, bad text, decent effects, oversharpened, lack of depth.

None are great, but conker's definitely beats the **** out of the first one.
 

PrepareYourself

Smash Ace
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Messages
950
LOLOOLOLOL, first guy's sig sucks monkey balls: ****ty render quality, ****ty colors, ****ty text, meh lighting.

conker's: meh colors, bad text, decent effects, oversharpened, lack of depth.

None are great, but conker's definitely beats the **** out of the first one.
Ditto.

Conker wins!
 

Allyssa

Smash Rookie
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
8
Location
Red Bluff, California
.... Conker's is better because, in my opinion, he put more oomph into his sig. Even though these are not very adequate, I still think he has the upper hand here.
 

Diddyknight

Smash Lord
Joined
May 9, 2008
Messages
1,134
Location
Socal -> FL
Conker All the way. His background is more impressive instead of the boring background. Conker also used C4D so that helped while Neok...looks like all he did was brush/Smudge/Flare/Soft light....

Conker has a direct light source. Neo has light all over...

Imo anyway...flame me xDDD
 

doom dragon 105

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 17, 2006
Messages
1,487
Location
Miami
I actually really liked Conker's imo the best he's pulled out

Was this even competition?

Conker's had a nice flow and the effects were nice. The lighting was cool too though the effects on the right were o_O
 

Honir

Smash Rookie
Joined
Mar 6, 2009
Messages
20
Conker gmv.

He has most of the basics of GFX in the image.

The first one has flow, Loose focal and too much lighting.
 
Top Bottom